Back to Maryland

SB0678 • 2026

Criminal Procedure - Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Search - Affidavit for Judicial Authorization

Criminal Procedure - Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Search - Affidavit for Judicial Authorization

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Senator Folden
Last action
2026-03-09
Official status
In the Senate - Hearing 3/10 at 1:15 p.m.
Effective date
2026-10-01

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Criminal Procedure - Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Search - Affidavit for Judicial Authorization

Altering the requirements for a sworn affidavit submitted for judicial authorization to initiate a forensic genetic genealogical DNA analysis and search (FGGS).

What This Bill Does

  • Altering the requirements for a sworn affidavit submitted for judicial authorization to initiate a forensic genetic genealogical DNA analysis and search (FGGS).

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Hearing canceled

  2. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Hearing 3/10 at 1:15 p.m.

  3. 2026-02-12 Senate

    Hearing 3/10 at 1:00 p.m.

  4. 2026-02-06 Senate

    First Reading Judicial Proceedings

  5. Maryland General Assembly

    Text - First - Criminal Procedure - Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Search - Affidavit for Judicial Authorization

Official Summary Text

Altering the requirements for a sworn affidavit submitted for judicial authorization to initiate a forensic genetic genealogical DNA analysis and search (FGGS).

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MATTER ADDED TO EXISTING LAW.
[Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law.
*sb0678*

SENATE BILL 678
E2 6lr3003

By: Senator Folden
Introduced and read first time: February 6, 2026
Assigned to: Judicial Proceedings

A BILL ENTITLED

AN ACT concerning 1

Criminal Procedure – Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Search – 2
Affidavit for Judicial Authorization 3

FOR the purpose of altering the requirements for a sworn affidavit submitted for judicial 4
authorization to initiate a fore nsic genetic genealogical DNA analysis and search 5
(FGGS); and generally relating to FGGS. 6

BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 7
Article – Criminal Procedure 8
Section 17–101(a), (b), (e), (f), (h), (i), and (l) and 17–102(a) 9
Annotated Code of Maryland 10
(2025 Replacement Volume) 11

BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 12
Article – Criminal Procedure 13
Section 17–102(b) 14
Annotated Code of Maryland 15
(2025 Replacement Volume) 16

SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 17
That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 18

Article – Criminal Procedure 19

17–101. 20

(a) In this title the following words have the meanings indicated. 21

(b) “CODIS” has the meaning stated in § 2–501 of the Public Safety Article. 22

(e) “Forensic genetic genealogical DNA analysis and search” or “FGGS” means: 23
2 SENATE BILL 678

(1) the forensic genetic genealogical DNA analysis of biological material 1
using SNP or other sequencing techniques to develop an FGG profile; 2

(2) a subsequent search using the FGG profile in a publicly available open–3
data personal genomics database or a direct–to–consumer genetic genealogy service to find 4
individuals related to the source of the FGG profile; and 5

(3) a genealogical search using public records and other lawful means to 6
obtain information in accordance with this title. 7

(f) (1) “Forensic sample” means biological material reasonably believed by 8
investigators to have been deposited by a putative perpetrator and that was collected from 9
a crime scene or a person, an item, or a location connected to the criminal event. 10

(2) “Forensic sample” includes biological material from unidentified 11
human remains. 12

(h) “Putative perpetrator” means one or more criminal actors reasonably believed 13
by investigators to have committed the crime under in vestigation and to be the source of, 14
or a contributor to, a forensic sample deposited during or incident to the commission of a 15
crime. 16

(i) “Reasonable investigative leads” means credible, case –specific facts, 17
information, or circumstances that would lead a reasonably cautious investigator to believe 18
that the pursuit would have a fair probability of identifying a putative perpetrator. 19

(l) “STR DNA profile” means a genetic profile that examines genetic locations on 20
the non–sex chromosomes that are used fo r the statewide DNA database system or the 21
national DNA database system. 22

17–102. 23

(a) (1) FGGS may not be initiated without judicial authorization and without 24
certifying before the court that the forensic sample and the criminal case satisfy the criteria 25
set forth in this section. 26

(2) If an FGGS is certified before a court in accordance with this section, 27
the court shall authorize the initiation of the FGGS. 28

(b) (1) A sworn affidavit shall be submitted by a law enforcement agent with 29
approval of a prosecutor from the relevant jurisdiction asserting that: 30

(i) the identity of the perpetrator is unknown; 31

SENATE BILL 678 3

(ii) the crime is the commission of, or the attempt to commit, murder, 1
rape, a felony sexual offense, or a criminal act involving circumstances presenting a 2
substantial and ongoing threat to public safety or national security; 3

(iii) the forensic sample to be subjected to the FGGS is biological 4
material reasonably believed by investigators to have been deposited by a putative 5
perpetrator and that the forensic sample was collected from: 6

1. a crime scene; 7

2. a person, an item, or a location connected to the criminal 8
event; or 9

3. the unidentified human remains of a suspected homicide 10
victim; 11

(iv) 1. an STR DNA profile has already been developed from the 12
forensic sample, was entered into the statewide DNA database system and the national 13
DNA database system, and failed to identify a known individual; OR 14

2. A. AN EVIDENTIARY DNA PROFILE SUITABLE FOR 15
DIRECT COMPARISON HA S ALREADY BEEN DEVELOPED FRO M THE FORENSIC 16
SAMPLE, FAILED TO IDENTIFY A KNOWN IND IVIDUAL, AND WAS NOT ABLE TO BE 17
ENTERED INTO THE STA TEWIDE DNA DATABASE SYSTEM OR N ATIONAL DNA 18
DATABASE SYSTEM BECAUSE THE DNA PROFILE FAILED TO ME ET TIER 19
REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS CORE LOCUS CRITERIA, FOR ENTRY INTO CODIS; AND 20

B. AT LEAST 15 YEARS HAVE ELAPSED SINCE THE CRIME 21
BEING INVESTIGATED WAS COMMITTED; and 22

(v) unless the crime being investigated presents an ongoing threat 23
to public safety or national security concerns, re asonable investigative leads have been 24
pursued and failed to identify the perpetrator. 25

(2) Nothing in this subsection may be construed to require that all 26
investigative leads have been exhausted. 27

SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect 28
October 1, 2026. 29