Back to Massachusetts

H1878 • 2025

An Act relative to streamline the judicial review of local land use decisions

An Act relative to streamline the judicial review of local land use decisions

Active

The official status still shows this bill as active or still awaiting another formal step.

Sponsor
Joseph W. McGonagle, Jr.
Last action
2026-03-26
Official status
Accompanied a study order, see H5281 (under House Rule 27)
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

An Act relative to streamline the judicial review of local land use decisions

An Act relative to streamline the judicial review of local land use decisions By Representative McGonagle of Everett, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No.

What This Bill Does

  • An Act relative to streamline the judicial review of local land use decisions By Representative McGonagle of Everett, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No.
  • 1878) of Joseph W.
  • McGonagle, Jr., relative to judicial review of local land use decisions.
  • The Judiciary.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-26 House

    Accompanied a study order, see H5281 (under House Rule 27)

  2. 2025-10-10 Joint

    Hearing scheduled for 10/21/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-2

  3. 2025-02-27 House

    Referred to the committee on The Judiciary

  4. 2025-02-27 Senate

    Senate concurred

  5. House

    Reported by committee to Clerk’s Office for processing, will accompany a study order

Official Summary Text

An Act relative to streamline the judicial review of local land use decisions
By Representative McGonagle of Everett, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1878) of Joseph W. McGonagle, Jr., relative to judicial review of local land use decisions. The Judiciary.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
×

Bill H.1878

SECTION 1.

The second paragraph of Section 17 of chapter 40A, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out the first sentence and inserting in place thereof the following paragraphs:-

If the complaint is filed by someone other than the original applicant, appellant or petitioner, such original applicant, appellant, or petitioner and all members of the board of appeals or special permit granting authority shall be named as parties defendant with their addresses. To avoid delay in the proceedings, instead of the usual service of process, the plaintiff shall within fourteen days after the filing of the complaint, send written notice thereof, with a copy of the complaint, by delivery or certified mail to all defendants, including the members of the board of appeals or special permit granting authority and shall within twenty-one days after the entry of the complaint file with the clerk of the court an affidavit that such notice has been given. If no such affidavit is filed within such time the complaint shall be dismissed. No answer shall be required but an answer may be filed and notice of such filing with a copy of the answer and an affidavit of such notice given to all parties as provided above within seven days after the filing of the answer. Other persons may be permitted to intervene, upon motion. The clerk of the court shall give notice of the hearing as in other cases without jury, to all parties whether or not they have appeared.

The board of appeals or special permit granting authority shall transmit to the reviewing court the record of its proceedings, including its minutes, findings, decisions, and, if available, a true and correct transcript of its proceedings.

If the proceeding was tape recorded, a transcript of that tape recording is a true and correct transcript for purposes of establishing the record.

The court may not accept or consider any evidence outside the record of the board of appeals or special permit granting authority unless that evidence was offered to the board of appeals or special permit granting authority, respectively, and the court determines that it was improperly excluded from the record.

The court shall examine the record upon which the decision of the board of appeals or special permit granting authority is based, and upon such record determine only whether or not the decision is arbitrary, capricious, or illegal.

A decision of a board of appeals or special permit granting authority is valid if the decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record and is not arbitrary, capricious, or illegal.

The foregoing remedy shall be exclusive, notwithstanding any defect of procedure or of notice other than notice by publication, mailing or posting as required by this chapter, and the validity of any action shall not be questioned for matters relating to defects in procedure or of notice in any other proceedings except with respect to such publication, mailing or posting and then only by a proceeding commenced within ninety days after the decision has been filed in the office of the city or town clerk, but the parties shall have all rights of appeal and exception as in other equity cases.

SECTION 2.

Section 17 of chapter 40A, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out the sixth paragraph and inserting in place thereof the following paragraph:-

A non-municipal plaintiff seeking to reverse approval of a project under this section shall post a bond in an amount to be set by the court that is sufficient to cover twice the estimated: (1) annual carrying costs of the property owner, or a person or entity carrying such costs on behalf of the owner for the property, as may be established by affidavit; plus (2) an amount sufficient to cover the defendants attorney’s fees, all of which shall be computed over the estimated period of time during which the appeal is expected to delay the start of construction.

The bond shall be forfeited to the property owner in an amount sufficient to cover the property owner’s carrying costs and legal fees less any net income received by the plaintiff from the property during the pendency of the court case in the event a plaintiff does not substantially prevail on its appeal.

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The General Court provides this information as a public service and while we endeavor to keep the data accurate and current to the best of our ability, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Close