Back to Massachusetts

H3479 • 2025

An Act relative to the onshore siting of infrastructure associated with offshore wind projects

An Act relative to the onshore siting of infrastructure associated with offshore wind projects

Energy
Active

The official status still shows this bill as active or still awaiting another formal step.

Sponsor
Kip A. Diggs
Last action
2026-04-06
Official status
Accompanied a study order, see H5323
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

An Act relative to the onshore siting of infrastructure associated with offshore wind projects

An Act relative to the onshore siting of infrastructure associated with offshore wind projects By Representative Diggs of Barnstable, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No.

What This Bill Does

  • An Act relative to the onshore siting of infrastructure associated with offshore wind projects By Representative Diggs of Barnstable, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No.
  • 3479) of Kip A.
  • Diggs relative to the onshore siting of infrastructure associated with offshore wind projects.
  • Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-06 House

    Accompanied a study order, see H5323

  2. 2025-12-04 House

    Reporting date extended to Wednesday, March 18, 2026

  3. 2025-10-27 House

    Reporting date extended to Wednesday, December 3, 2025

  4. 2025-07-18 Joint

    Hearing scheduled for 07/29/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-1

  5. 2025-02-27 House

    Referred to the committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy

  6. 2025-02-27 Senate

    Senate concurred

Official Summary Text

An Act relative to the onshore siting of infrastructure associated with offshore wind projects
By Representative Diggs of Barnstable, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3479) of Kip A. Diggs relative to the onshore siting of infrastructure associated with offshore wind projects. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
×

Bill H.3479

SECTION 1.

1. Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, and standing firmly in support of the goal to increase the generation of electrical power from renewable sources, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts directs the developers of offshore wind power projects to site the related onshore infrastructure on coastal locations that are industrial in nature and/or that contain existing power plants, whether they be active or decommissioned.

2. It is the direction of the Commonwealth that no such offshore wind projects should come ashore on or underneath public beaches, parks, recreation areas or conservation lands, or in small residential communities whose economies are based on tourism.

3. Such infrastructure shall include but not be limited to high voltage power cables, splicing vaults installed beneath public parking lots and public and private roadways, concrete duct banks conveying high voltage power cables beneath public and private roadways, and electric substations newly constructed or rebuilt to take the electricity generated by offshore wind turbines.

4. Such infrastructure, especially including but not limited to electric substations, should never be situated on top of a sole source aquifer and on or adjacent to wellhead protection zones, where any explosion or leak of toxic dielectric cooling fluids could prove catastrophic and a long-lasting threat to public health and safety.

5. Prior to accepting any new bids for offshore wind development, including the ongoing Section 83C Round 4 Offshore Wind Procurement, the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) is directed to:

a. Review and evaluate independent studies of coordinated offshore transmission solutions, analyses and any such other studies and other recognized experts that are deemed credible and relevant; and

b. Report the results of such EEA review and evaluation, including EEA’s assessment of the potential cost savings to electric utility ratepayers of coordinated offshore transmission solutions in public session to the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court and to the Massachusetts voters at large.

6. Furthermore, each of the Energy Facilities Siting Board (EFSB) and any related commission or permitting agency of the Commonwealth is directed not to consider, hold hearings on, approve or issue any permits for such projects that contravene the intentions stated herein.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon its passage.

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The General Court provides this information as a public service and while we endeavor to keep the data accurate and current to the best of our ability, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Close