Back to Michigan

HB5816 • 2026

Administrative procedure: guidelines; de novo review during administrative law hearings; allow. Amends secs. 79 & 106 of 1969 PA 306 (MCL 24.279 & 24.306).

Administrative procedure: guidelines; de novo review during administrative law hearings; allow. Amends secs. 79 & 106 of 1969 PA 306 (MCL 24.279 & 24.306).

Active

The official status still shows this bill as active or still awaiting another formal step.

Sponsor
Luke Meerman (District 89), Joseph Aragona (District 60), Rachelle Smit (District 43), Tim Kelly (District 93), Matt Bierlein (District 97), Mike Harris (District 52)
Last action
2026-06-11
Official status
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Administrative procedure: guidelines; de novo review during administrative law hearings; allow. Amends secs. 79 & 106 of 1969 PA 306 (MCL 24.279 & 24.306).

Administrative procedure: guidelines; de novo review during administrative law hearings; allow.

What This Bill Does

  • Administrative procedure: guidelines; de novo review during administrative law hearings; allow.
  • Amends secs.
  • 79 & 106 of 1969 PA 306 (MCL 24.279 & 24.306).

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-06-11 SJ 52 Pg. 627

    PASSED BY HOUSE WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT

  2. 2026-06-11 SJ 52 Pg. 627

    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS

  3. 2026-06-09 HJ 44 Pg. 739

    read a second time

  4. 2026-06-09 HJ 44 Pg. 739

    placed on third reading

  5. 2026-06-09 HJ 44 Pg. 750

    placed on immediate passage

  6. 2026-06-09 HJ 44 Pg. 750

    read a third time

  7. 2026-06-09 HJ 44 Pg. 750

    passed; given immediate effect Roll Call #191 Yeas 58 Nays 46 Excused 0 Not Voting 6

  8. 2026-06-09 HJ 44 Pg. 750

    transmitted

  9. 2026-06-04 HJ 43 Pg. 724

    reported with recommendation without amendment

  10. 2026-06-04 HJ 43 Pg. 724

    referred to second reading

  11. 2026-04-21 HJ 29 Pg. 420

    bill electronically reproduced 04/16/2026

  12. 2026-04-16 HJ 28 Pg. 413

    introduced by Representative Rep. Luke Meerman

  13. 2026-04-16 HJ 28 Pg. 413

    read a first time

  14. 2026-04-16 HJ 28 Pg. 413

    referred to Committee on Rules

Official Summary Text

Administrative procedure: guidelines; de novo review during administrative law hearings; allow. Amends secs. 79 & 106 of 1969 PA 306 (MCL 24.279 & 24.306).

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HB-5816, As Passed House, June 9, 2026

RMH H05228'25 *_HB5816_APH_1 62rmfu

HOUSE BILL NO. 5816

A bill to amend 1969 PA 306, entitled
"Administrative procedures act of 1969,"
by amending sections 79 and 106 (MCL 24.279 and 24.306).
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:
Sec. 79. An agency, 1 or more members of the agency, a person 1
designated by statute, or 1 or more hearing officers designated and 2
authorized by the agency to handle contested cases , shall be are 3
the presiding officers in a contested cases. Hearings shall case. A 4
contested case hearing must be conducted in an impartial manner and 5
April 16, 2026, Introduced by Reps. Meerman, Aragona, Smit, Kelly, Bierlein and Harris and
referred to Committee on Rules.
2
Final Page
RMH H05228'25 *_HB5816_APH_1 62rmfu
the presiding officers shall conduct the review de novo. On the 1
filing in good faith by a party of a timely and sufficient 2
affidavit of personal bias or disqualification of a presiding 3
officer, the agency shall determine the matter as a part of the 4
record in the case, and its the agency's determination shall be is 5
subject to judicial review at the conclusion of the proceeding. 6
When a presiding officer is disqualified or it is impracticable for 7
him the presiding officer to continue the contested case hearing, 8
another presiding officer may be assigned to continue with the 9
contested case hearing unless it is shown that substantial 10
prejudice to the party will result. therefrom. 11
Sec. 106. (1) Except when a statute or the constitution 12
provides for a different scope of review, the court shall conduct 13
the review de novo and not defer to the agency's decision or order. 14
The court shall hold unlawful and set aside a decision or order of 15
an agency if the substantial rights of the petitioner have been 16
prejudiced because the decision or order is any of the following: 17
(a) In violation of the constitution or a statute. 18
(b) In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of 19
the agency. 20
(c) Made upon on unlawful procedure resulting in material 21
prejudice to a party. 22
(d) Not supported by competent, material, and substantial 23
evidence on the whole record. 24
(e) Arbitrary, capricious, or clearly an abuse or unwarranted 25
exercise of discretion. 26
(f) Affected by other substantial and material error of law. 27
(2) The court, as appropriate, may affirm, reverse, or modify 28
the decision or order or remand the case for further proceedings. 29