Back to Minnesota

SF4598 • 2026

Requirements relating to design standards and variances in certain transportation projects modification

Requirements relating to design standards and variances in certain transportation projects modification

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Dibble, Johnson Stewart
Last action
2026-03-18
Official status
Introduction and first reading
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The plain English breakdown is still being put together. The official documents below are already here.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-18 House

    Introduction and first reading

Official Summary Text

Requirements relating to design standards and variances in certain transportation projects modification

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
A bill for an act

relating to transportation; modifying requirements relating to design standards and

variances in certain transportation projects; requiring a report; amending Minnesota

Statutes 2024, sections 162.02, subdivision 3a, by adding subdivisions; 162.09,

subdivision 3a, by adding subdivisions; 162.155; proposing coding for new law

in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 162.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

Section 1.

Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 162.02, is amended by adding a subdivision

to read:

new text begin

Subd. 1a.

new text end

new text begin

State-aid standards.

new text end

new text begin

Design and engineering standards for all new construction,

reconstruction, rehabilitation, or resurfacing county state-aid projects approved by the

state-aid engineer are determined and set by the most recent edition of the Facility Design

Guide or successor document established by the commissioner.

new text end

new text begin

EFFECTIVE DATE.

new text end

new text begin

This section is effective July 1, 2026, for county state-aid roadway

projects on or after that date.

new text end

Sec. 2.

Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 162.02, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:

Subd. 3a.

Variances from rules and engineering standards.

(a) The commissioner

may grant variances from the rules and from the engineering standards developed pursuant

to section
162.021
or
162.07, subdivision 2
. A political subdivision in which a county

state-aid highway is located or is proposed to be located may submit a written request to

the commissioner for a variance for that highway. The commissioner
deleted text begin
shall
deleted text end
new text begin
must
new text end
comply

with section
174.75, subdivision 5
, in evaluating a variance request related to a complete

streets project.

(b) The commissioner may grant or deny the variance within 30 days of receiving the

variance request. If the variance is denied, the political subdivision may request, within 30

days of receiving notice of denial, and
deleted text begin
shall
deleted text end
new text begin
must
new text end
be granted a contested case hearing.
new text begin
The

commissioner must use the criteria set forth in subdivision 3c to evaluate the variance

request.
new text end

new text begin

(c) If the commissioner denies a variance, the commissioner must notify the chairs and

ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over transportation

and provide justification for denying the variance within 30 days of notifying the political

subdivision of the denial. The justification must include the commissioner's reasoning for

the denial, the recommendation of the advisory committee on variances, and the reasoning

used by the committee to approve or deny the variance.

new text end

deleted text begin

(c)
deleted text end
new text begin
(d)
new text end
For purposes of this subdivision, "political subdivision" includes (1) an agency

of a political subdivision
deleted text begin
which
deleted text end
new text begin
that
new text end
has jurisdiction over parks, and (2) a regional park

authority.

new text begin

(e) The commissioner must give special consideration to proposed modifications for:

new text end

new text begin

(1) narrowing lanes from 11 feet to ten feet for roadways in an urban or suburban context;

new text end

new text begin

(2) designs allowed by current Department of Transportation trunk highway standards

for roadways of similar context;

new text end

new text begin

(3) a proposed design intended to increase the safety of nonmotorized transportation to

and from a school;

new text end

new text begin

(4) a proposed design intended to increase the safety of nonmotorized access to a transit

corridor;

new text end

new text begin

(5) any design element in a project funded by the safe routes to school program, except

where specifically prohibited in the current Department of Transportation Facility Design

Guide; or

new text end

new text begin

(6) a variance request that specifically states the proposed design modification is based

on the following alternative design manuals:

new text end

new text begin

(i) the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO)

A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets or other AASHTO design guides

formally recognized by the Federal Highway Administration;

new text end

new text begin

(ii) the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares:

A Context Sensitive Approach and Implementing Context Sensitive Design Handbook;

new text end

new text begin

(iii) the National Association of City Transportation Officials' (NACTO) Urban Street

Design Guide and other NACTO design guides formally recognized by the Federal Highway

Administration;

new text end

new text begin

(iv) the Global Designing Cities Initiative's (GDCI) Global Street Design Guide and

Designing Streets for Kids supplement; or

new text end

new text begin

(v) any other design guide recognized or approved by the Federal Highway

Administration in United States Code, title 23, section 109(o)(B).

new text end

new text begin

(f) Paragraph (e) does not apply to a natural preservation route established under section

162.021.

new text end

new text begin

EFFECTIVE DATE.

new text end

new text begin

This section is effective July 1, 2026, for county state-aid roadway

projects on or after that date.

new text end

Sec. 3.

Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 162.02, is amended by adding a subdivision to

read:

new text begin

Subd. 3c.

new text end

new text begin

Variance format.

new text end

new text begin

To submit a formal request for a variance from applicable

design standards under subdivision 1a, a political subdivision must submit a written request

to the commissioner. The written request must be in the form of an adopted resolution. The

request must:

new text end

new text begin

(1) identify the project by location and termini;

new text end

new text begin

(2) cite the specific part or standard for which the variance is requested from county

state-aid design rules;

new text end

new text begin

(3) describe the proposed modification and include technical information about the

design, including:

new text end

new text begin

(i) an index map; and

new text end

new text begin

(ii) a typical section with an inplace section and a proposed section;

new text end

new text begin

(4) describe the economic, social, safety, and environmental impacts that may result

from the requested variance;

new text end

new text begin

(5) identify the project's effectiveness in eliminating an existing and projected deficiency

in the transportation system, including identifying and citing whether the existing roadway's

design meets a recognized or approved Federal Highway Administration design guide

standard for a similar road context;

new text end

new text begin

(6) identify effects on adjacent lands;

new text end

new text begin

(7) identify the number of persons affected; and

new text end

new text begin

(8) identify relevant safety considerations as they apply to:

new text end

new text begin

(i) pedestrians;

new text end

new text begin

(ii) bicyclists;

new text end

new text begin

(iii) vulnerable road users;

new text end

new text begin

(iv) the motoring public; and

new text end

new text begin

(v) fire, police, and emergency service providers.

new text end

new text begin

EFFECTIVE DATE.

new text end

new text begin

This section is effective July 1, 2026, for county state-aid roadway

projects on or after that date.

new text end

Sec. 4.

Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 162.09, is amended by adding a subdivision to

read:

new text begin

Subd. 1a.

new text end

new text begin

State-aid standards.

new text end

new text begin

Design and engineering standards for all new construction,

reconstruction, rehabilitation, or resurfacing municipal state-aid projects approved by the

state-aid engineer are determined and set by the most recent edition of the Facility Design

Guide or successor document established by the commissioner.

new text end

new text begin

EFFECTIVE DATE.

new text end

new text begin

This section is effective July 1, 2026, for municipal state-aid

roadway projects on or after that date.

new text end

Sec. 5.

Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 162.09, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:

Subd. 3a.

Variances from rules and engineering standards.

(a) The commissioner

may grant variances from the rules and from the engineering standards developed pursuant

to section
162.13, subdivision 2
. A political subdivision in which a municipal state-aid street

is located or is proposed to be located may submit a written request to the commissioner

for a variance for that street. The commissioner
deleted text begin
shall
deleted text end
new text begin
must
new text end
comply with section
174.75,

subdivision 5
, in evaluating a variance request related to a complete streets project.

(b) The commissioner may grant or deny the variance within 30 days of receiving the

variance request. If the variance is denied, the political subdivision may request, within 30

days of receiving notice of denial, and
deleted text begin
shall
deleted text end
new text begin
must
new text end
be granted a contested case hearing.
new text begin
The

commissioner must use the criteria set forth in subdivision 3b to evaluate the variance

request.
new text end

new text begin

(c) If the commissioner denies a variance, the commissioner must notify the chairs and

ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over transportation

and provide justification for denying the variance within 30 days of notifying the political

subdivision of the denial. The justification must include the commissioner's reasoning for

the denial, the recommendation of the advisory committee on variances, and the reasoning

used by the committee to approve or deny the variance.

new text end

deleted text begin

(c)
deleted text end
new text begin
(d)
new text end
For purposes of this subdivision, "political subdivision" includes (1) an agency

of a political subdivision
deleted text begin
which
deleted text end
new text begin
that
new text end
has jurisdiction over parks, and (2) a regional park

authority.

new text begin

(e) The commissioner must give special consideration to proposed modifications for:

new text end

new text begin

(1) narrowing lanes from 11 feet to ten feet for roadways in an urban or suburban context;

new text end

new text begin

(2) designs allowed by current Department of Transportation trunk highway standards

for roadways of similar context;

new text end

new text begin

(3) a proposed design intended to increase the safety of nonmotorized transportation to

and from a school;

new text end

new text begin

(4) any design element in a project funded by the safe routes to school program, except

where specifically prohibited in the current Department of Transportation Facility Design

Guide; or

new text end

new text begin

(5) a variance request that specifically states the proposed design modification is based

on the following alternative design manuals:

new text end

new text begin

(i) the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO)

A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets or other AASHTO design guides

formally recognized by the Federal Highway Administration;

new text end

new text begin

(ii) the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares:

A Context Sensitive Approach and Implementing Context Sensitive Design Handbook;

new text end

new text begin

(iii) the National Association of City Transportation Officials' (NACTO) Urban Street

Design Guide and other NACTO design guides formally recognized by the Federal Highway

Administration;

new text end

new text begin

(iv) the Global Designing Cities Initiative's (GDCI) Global Street Design Guide and

Designing Streets for Kids supplement; or

new text end

new text begin

(v) any other design guide recognized or approved by the Federal Highway

Administration in United States Code, title 23, section 109(o)(B).

new text end

new text begin

EFFECTIVE DATE.

new text end

new text begin

This section is effective July 1, 2026, for municipal state-aid

roadway projects on or after that date.

new text end

Sec. 6.

Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 162.09, is amended by adding a subdivision to

read:

new text begin

Subd. 3b.

new text end

new text begin

Variance format.

new text end

new text begin

To submit a formal request for a variance from municipal

state-aid design rules, a political subdivision must submit a written request to the

commissioner. The written request must be in the form of an adopted resolution. The request

must:

new text end

new text begin

(1) identify the project by location and termini;

new text end

new text begin

(2) cite the specific part or standard for which the variance is requested from municipal

state-aid design rules;

new text end

new text begin

(3) describe the proposed modification and include technical information about the

design, including:

new text end

new text begin

(i) an index map; and

new text end

new text begin

(ii) a typical section with an inplace section and a proposed section;

new text end

new text begin

(4) describe the economic, social, safety, and environmental impacts that may result

from the requested variance;

new text end

new text begin

(5) identify the effectiveness of the project in eliminating an existing and projected

deficiency in the transportation system, including identifying and citing whether the existing

roadway's design meets a recognized or approved Federal Highway Administration design

guide standard for a similar road context;

new text end

new text begin

(6) identify effects on adjacent lands;

new text end

new text begin

(7) identify the number of persons affected; and

new text end

new text begin

(8) identify relevant safety considerations as they apply to:

new text end

new text begin

(i) pedestrians;

new text end

new text begin

(ii) bicyclists;

new text end

new text begin

(iii) vulnerable road users;

new text end

new text begin

(iv) the motoring public; and

new text end

new text begin

(v) fire, police, and emergency service providers.

new text end

new text begin

EFFECTIVE DATE.

new text end

new text begin

This section is effective July 1, 2026, for municipal state-aid

roadway projects on or after that date.

new text end

Sec. 7.

new text begin

[162.095] ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON DESIGN VARIANCES.

new text end

new text begin

Subdivision 1.

new text end

new text begin

Establishment.

new text end

new text begin

An advisory committee on design variances is established

to investigate and determine a recommendation for each variance submitted under sections

162.02, subdivision 3a, and 162.09, subdivision 3a.

new text end

new text begin

Subd. 2.

new text end

new text begin

Membership.

new text end

new text begin

(a) The advisory committee on design variances called by the

commissioner under subdivision 3 must consist of the following members:

new text end

new text begin

(1) not more than two county highway engineers, only one of whom may be from a

county containing a city of the first class;

new text end

new text begin

(2) not more than two city engineers, only one of whom may be from a city of the first

class;

new text end

new text begin

(3) not more than two county officials, only one of whom may be from a county

containing a city of the first class;

new text end

new text begin

(4) not more than two officials of an urban municipality, only one of whom may be from

a city of the first class;

new text end

new text begin

(5) not more than two representatives of the Office of Transit and Active Transportation

in the Department of Transportation, one of whom must be an engineer; and

new text end

new text begin

(6) one representative from the State Aid for Local Transportation Office in the

Department of Transportation with experience in project design and the safety factors

specified in sections 162.02, subdivision 3c, and 162.09, subdivision 3b.

new text end

new text begin

(b) No elected or appointed official that represents a political subdivision may serve on

the committee.

new text end

new text begin

(c) The committee must have at least one member but not more than 12 members from

a metropolitan area as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 2, as well as cities with a

population over 50,000 according to the most recent federal census.

new text end

new text begin

Subd. 3.

new text end

new text begin

Operating procedure; open meeting law.

new text end

new text begin

(a) The advisory committee must

meet at the call of the commissioner, at which time the committee must be instructed as to

the committee's responsibilities by a designee of the commissioner. The members of the

advisory committee must elect a chair from the members of the group at the initial meeting

and may set bylaws and procedures to investigate the requested variance.

new text end

new text begin

(b) An advisory committee organized under this section is subject to the Minnesota Open

Meeting Law under chapter 13D.

new text end

new text begin

Subd. 4.

new text end

new text begin

Factors considered.

new text end

new text begin

The advisory committee must make a recommendation

for a variance based on criteria set forth in sections 162.02, subdivision 3c, and 162.09,

subdivision 3b. The advisory committee must give special consideration to safety if the

proposed project design is intended to increase the safety of nonmotorized transportation

to and from a school.

new text end

new text begin

Subd. 5.

new text end

new text begin

Recommendation.

new text end

new text begin

After considering all data pertinent to the requested variance,

the advisory committee must recommend to the commissioner approval or denial of the

request. If the committee denies the variance, the committee must provide specific reasoning

for the denial and identify the design standard used to evaluate the denial.

new text end

new text begin

Subd. 6.

new text end

new text begin

Administration.

new text end

new text begin

Upon request of the advisory committee, the commissioner

must provide meeting space, technical support, and administrative services for the group.

new text end

new text begin

Subd. 7.

new text end

new text begin

Legislative report.

new text end

new text begin

By January 15 of each even-numbered year, the

commissioner of transportation must submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority

members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over transportation policy and

finance. The report must summarize the activities of any advisory committee on variances

from the prior two years, identify each committee's analysis and findings for each variance

approved or denied, identify whether the commissioner and an advisory committee came

to a different decision on a requested variance and identify the reasons for the difference,

and provide recommendations on improvements to the advisory committee process.

new text end

new text begin

EFFECTIVE DATE.

new text end

new text begin

This section is effective July 1, 2026, for state-aid design variances

sought on or after that date.

new text end

Sec. 8.

Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 162.155, is amended to read:

162.155 RULEMAKING.

deleted text begin

(a) The commissioner shall adopt rules setting forth the criteria to be considered by the

commissioner in evaluating requests for variances under sections
162.02, subdivision 3a

and
162.09, subdivision 3a
. The rules must include, but are not limited to, economic,

engineering and safety guidelines.

deleted text end

deleted text begin

(b)
deleted text end
new text begin
(a)
new text end
The commissioner shall adopt rules establishing the engineering standards for

cost estimation under sections
162.07, subdivision 2
, and
162.13, subdivision 2
.

deleted text begin

(c)
deleted text end
new text begin
(b)
new text end
The rules adopted by the commissioner under this section, and sections
162.02
;

162.07, subdivision 2
;
162.09
; and
162.13, subdivision 2
, are exempt from the rulemaking

provisions of chapter 14. The rules are subject to section
14.386
, except that, notwithstanding

paragraph (b) of that section, the rules continue in effect until repealed or superseded by

other law or rule.