Back to Minnesota

SF4900 • 2026

Nuclear-powered electric generating facilities in Minnesota potential evaluation study appropriation

Nuclear-powered electric generating facilities in Minnesota potential evaluation study appropriation

Budget Energy
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Mathews
Last action
2026-03-26
Official status
Introduction and first reading
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The plain English breakdown is still being put together. The official documents below are already here.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-26 House

    Introduction and first reading

Official Summary Text

Nuclear-powered electric generating facilities in Minnesota potential evaluation study appropriation

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
A bill for an act

relating to energy; appropriating money for a study evaluating the potential to

construct nuclear-powered electric generating facilities in Minnesota.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

Section 1.
new text begin
NUCLEAR ENERGY STUDY; APPROPRIATION.
new text end

new text begin

(a) Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 116C.779, subdivision 1, paragraph (j),

$....... in fiscal year 2027 is appropriated from the renewable development account under

Minnesota Statutes, section 116C.779, subdivision 1, to the Public Utilities Commission to

contract with the Great Plains Institute to conduct a study evaluating the factors affecting

the future construction of nuclear-powered electric generating facilities in Minnesota. The

study must be completed no later than June 30, 2027, and must, at a minimum, analyze:

new text end

new text begin

(1) changes in federal regulations governing the licensing of nuclear-powered facilities

that may expedite the review and approval process;

new text end

new text begin

(2) technological advances made with respect to conventional nuclear-powered facilities

that affect safety and cost;

new text end

new text begin

(3) the prospects for factory-built, portable small modular reactors with a capacity of

up to 300 megawatts, including:

new text end

new text begin

(i) the type of technology available;

new text end

new text begin

(ii) current licensing status; and

new text end

new text begin

(iii) estimated costs;

new text end

new text begin

(4) siting issues, including:

new text end

new text begin

(i) the degree to which the requirement for proximity to water resources sufficient to

meet cooling needs restricts possible locations of nuclear facilities, including a list of

locations in Minnesota that currently meet cooling needs;

new text end

new text begin

(ii) the potential for colocating nuclear facilities with businesses that demand very large

amounts of electricity;

new text end

new text begin

(iii) the environmental impacts of nuclear facilities, including impacts on the health of

nearby residents;

new text end

new text begin

(iv) the prospects for host communities to accept nuclear facilities and best practices to

engage communities regarding siting for nuclear facilities; and

new text end

new text begin

(v) how interconnection and transmission issues affect potential plant locations.

new text end

new text begin

(5) nuclear waste issues, including:

new text end

new text begin

(i) the amount and toxicity of radioactive waste produced by both conventional nuclear

technologies and small modular reactors;

new text end

new text begin

(ii) the costs of on-site storage;

new text end

new text begin

(iii) the prospects for developing permanent radioactive waste storage at either a federally

owned or privately owned repository to which Minnesota's waste could be transported; and

new text end

new text begin

(iv) the feasibility and cost of reprocessing nuclear waste;

new text end

new text begin

(6) the economic impacts of various nuclear technologies on a host community, including:

new text end

new text begin

(i) increased employment levels during construction and operations;

new text end

new text begin

(ii) increased local economic activity resulting from purchases made by the

nuclear-powered facility and the facility's employees; and

new text end

new text begin

(iii) potential tax revenue to local communities, schools, and the state; and

new text end

new text begin

(7) impacts of new nuclear-powered electric generating plants on public safety officials

and emergency responders in host communities and adjacent areas with respect to emergency

planning efforts.

new text end

new text begin

(b) No later than February 1, 2027, the commission must submit the study to the chairs

and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over energy

finance and policy.

new text end

new text begin

EFFECTIVE DATE.

new text end

new text begin

This section is effective the day following final enactment.

new text end