Back to Missouri

HCR50 • 2026

Rejects the Obergefell v. Hodges decision and calls upon the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges

Rejects the Obergefell v. Hodges decision and calls upon the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Whaley, Burt (138)
Last action
2026-05-15
Official status
05/15/2026 - Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
Effective date
2026-08-28

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Rejects the Obergefell v. Hodges decision and calls upon the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges

Rejects the Obergefell v.

What This Bill Does

  • Rejects the Obergefell v.
  • Hodges decision and calls upon the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse Obergefell v.
  • Hodges

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-15 Missouri House of Representatives and Missouri Senate

    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)

  2. 2026-02-23 Missouri House of Representatives and Missouri Senate

    Read Second Time (H)

  3. 2026-02-19 Missouri House of Representatives and Missouri Senate

    Introduced and Read First Time (H)

Official Summary Text

Rejects the Obergefell v. Hodges decision and calls upon the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
SECOND REGULAR SESSION
HOUSE CONCURRENT
RESOLUTION NO. 50
103RD GENERAL ASSEMBL Y
INTRODUCED BY REPRESENT A TIVE WHALEY .
7288H.01I JOSEPH ENGLER, Chief Clerk
WHEREAS, the Ober gefell v . Hodges decision by the Supreme Court of the United
2 States is at odds with the Constitution of the United States, 576 U.S. 644 (2015)(hereafter
3 Ober gefell), and the principles of the United States; and
4
5 WHEREAS, liberty has long been understood as individual freedom from
6 governmental action, not as a right to a particular governmental entitlement; and
7
8 WHEREAS, the Ober gefell decision ignores the Declaration of Independence's
9 proclamation that human dignity is innate and that "all men are created equal" and "endowed
10 by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights"; instead, such decision sees dignity coming
11 from the government; and
12
13 WHEREAS, Ober gefell denies the framers' understanding that liberty flows from our
14 innate dignity , causing collateral damage to other aspects of our constitutional order that
15 protects liberty , including religious liberty; and
16
17 WHEREAS, Ober gefell relies on the dangerous fiction of treating the Due Process
18 Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States as a font of
19 substantive rights, a doctrine that strays from the full meaning of the Constitution of the
20 United States and exalts judges at the expense of the people from whom they derive their
21 authority; and
22
23 WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States recognized in United States v .
24 W indsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013), that the definition of marriage is "an area that has long been
25 regarded as a virtually exclusive province of the States". Therefore, the state of Missouri, not
26 the Supreme Court of the United States, has the right to regulate marriage for its residents;
27 and
28
29 WHEREAS, Ober gefell requires states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples
30 and to recognize same-sex marriages in contravention of the states' constitutions and the
31 expressed will of their voters, thus undermining the civil liberties of those states' residents and
32 voters; and
33
34 WHEREAS, marriage as an institution has been recognized as the union of one man
35 and one woman for more than two thousand years, and within common law , the basis of the
36 United States' Anglo-American legal tradition, for more than eight hundred years; and
37
38 WHEREAS, the Ober gefell decision arbitrarily and unjustly rejects the definition of
39 marriage in favor of a novel, flawed interpretation of key clauses within the Constitution of
40 the United States and our nation's legal and cultural precedents; and
41
42 WHEREAS, the Ober gefell decision was illegitimate because two of the Justices on
43 the Supreme Court of the United States in the majority ruling, specifically Justices Ruth
44 Bader Ginsbur g and Elena Kagan, had previously of ficiated same-sex weddings and thus
45 were not impartial triers of fact. Therefore, those Justices should have recused themselves
46 according to 28 U.S.C. Section 455; and
47
48 WHEREAS, Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis was persecuted for her faith in
49 refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses, and the Supreme Court of the United States
50 declined to uphold and defend her First Amendment rights on account of the Ober gefell
51 decision; and
52
53 WHEREAS, since court rulings are not laws and only legislatures elected by the
54 people may pass laws, Ober gefell is an illegitimate overreach; and
55
56 WHEREAS, the people of the state of Missouri voted to define marriage as between
57 one man and one woman in Amendment 2 in 2004, by a vote of nearly seventy-one percent to
58 twenty-nine percent:
59
60 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOL VED that the members of the House of
61 Representatives of the One Hundred Third General Assembly , Second Regular Session, the
62 Senate concurring therein, hereby reject the Ober gefell decision and call upon the Supreme
63 Court of the United States to reverse Ober gefell and restore the natural law definition of
64 marriage, a union of one man and one woman, as was recognized at the founding; and
HCR 50 2
65
66 BE IT FUR THER RESOL VED that the Missouri General Assembly insists on
67 restoring the issue of marriage and enforcement of all laws pertaining to marriage back to the
68 several states and the people; and
69
70 BE IT FUR THER RESOL VED that the Chief Clerk of the Missouri House of
71 Representatives be instructed to prepare a properly inscribed copy of this resolution for the
72 Supreme Court of the United States.
✔
HCR 50 3