KLS Keeping Law Simple Legislation in plain English

Straight-ahead summaries built from the official bill text. We keep the source links front and center and leave the decision up to you.

Back to Missouri

SB1566 • 2026

Modifies provisions relating to criminal informants

Modifies provisions relating to criminal informants

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Burger, Jamie; House handler: N/A
Last action
2026-02-05
Official status
Second Read and Referred S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee
Effective date
2026-08-28

Plain English Breakdown

The plain English breakdown is still being put together. The official documents below are already here.

Bill History

  1. 2026-02-05 S309

    Second Read and Referred S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee

  2. 2026-01-15 S183

    S First Read

Official Summary Text

The following summaries of this bill are available:

Print All Summaries

Introduced

Print

SB 1566 - This act requires prosecuting attorneys to make certain disclosures about the use of informants in a criminal case. Under the provisions of this act, a prosecuting attorney must disclose the identity of the informant and the substance of the testimony.

This act requires that all phone and in person communication by law enforcement or prosecution personnel with informants be audio or video recorded and shared with the defense. In addition, all written communication with the informant must be shared.

Under this act, the court shall conduct a pretrial hearing to determine the reliability and admissibility of the informant's testimony upon the motion of the defendant. This act provides certain factors for the court to use when making its determination, including: the extent to which the statement is confirmed; the specificity of the alleged statement; the informant's general character and criminal record; whether the informant has given reliable information to authorities in the past; and the presence or absence of any relationship between the accused and the informant.

This act provides that the court shall exclude the informant's testimony if the prosecuting attorney fails to prove the reliability of such testimony by a preponderance of the evidence.
This act requires that the court provide jury instructions to assess the informant's testimony with greater scrutiny and relay details of any facts the jury should consider such as criminal history and any benefits offered or expected in exchange for the testimony.

Under the provisions of this act, a prosecuting attorney's failure to provide the required disclosures regarding the use of an informant shall be considered a due process violation. In a case where the prosecuting attorney has made such violation, the defendant is entitled to a new trial or vacation of the conviction, as well as the right to seek compensation in a civil action from non-immune persons relating to the wrongful conviction.

This act provides that if it is determined that an informant made false testimony at a trial, the prosecuting attorney where the trial occurred can charge and prosecute the informant with perjury.
TRISTAN BENSON, JR.