Back to Montana

SB13 • 2025

Remove Supreme Court original jurisdiction for ballot review

Remove Supreme Court original jurisdiction for ballot review

Elections
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Daniel Emrich
Last action
2025-05-23
Official status
(S) Died in Process
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Remove Supreme Court original jurisdiction for ballot review

Remove Supreme Court original jurisdiction for ballot review

What This Bill Does

  • Remove Supreme Court original jurisdiction for ballot review

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

COMMITTEE

Plain English: COMMITTEE 2

  • The official amendment file could not be read automatically during the last sync, so only the official amendment metadata is shown right now.
FLOOR

Plain English: FLOOR 5

  • The official amendment file could not be read automatically during the last sync, so only the official amendment metadata is shown right now.

Bill History

  1. 2025-05-23 SENATE

    (S) Died in Process

  2. 2025-04-10 HOUSE

    (H) Scheduled for 2nd Reading

  3. 2025-04-10 HOUSE

    (H) 2nd Reading Not Concurred

  4. 2025-04-09 HOUSE

    (H) 2nd Reading Pass Consideration

  5. 2025-04-03 HOUSE

    (H) Committee Executive Action--Bill Concurred

  6. 2025-04-03 HOUSE

    (H) Committee Report--Bill Concurred

  7. 2025-01-27 SENATE

    (S) Transmitted to House

  8. 2025-01-27 HOUSE

    (H) Referred to Committee

  9. 2025-01-27 HOUSE

    (H) First Reading

  10. 2025-01-24 SENATE

    (S) Scheduled for 3rd Reading

  11. 2025-01-24 SENATE

    (S) 3rd Reading Passed

  12. 2025-01-23 SENATE

    (S) Scheduled for 2nd Reading

  13. 2025-01-23 SENATE

    (S) 2nd Reading Passed

  14. 2025-01-22 SENATE

    (S) Committee Executive Action--Bill Passed

  15. 2025-01-22 SENATE

    (S) Committee Report--Bill Passed

  16. 2025-01-10 SENATE

    (S) Hearing

  17. 2025-01-07 SENATE

    (S) Referred to Committee

  18. 2025-01-06 SENATE

    (S) First Reading

  19. 2024-12-06 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft Delivered to Requester

  20. 2024-12-06 SENATE

    (S) Introduced

  21. 2024-12-04 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Assembly

  22. 2024-12-04 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft Ready for Delivery

  23. 2024-12-03 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Input/Proofing

  24. 2024-12-03 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Final Drafter Review

  25. 2024-11-22 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Edit

  26. 2024-11-19 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Legal Review

  27. 2024-11-15 HOUSE

    (LC) Drafter Assigned

Official Summary Text

Remove Supreme Court original jurisdiction for ballot review

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
****
69th Legislature 2025 SB 13.1
- 1 - Authorized Print Version – SB 13
1 SENATE BILL NO. 13
2 INTRODUCED BY D. EMRICH
3 BY REQUEST OF THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT AND REFORM
4
5 A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: “AN ACT ELIMINATING ALL SUPREME COURT ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
6 OTHER THAN OF WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS AND PROVIDING FOR DISTRICT COURT REVIEW OF
7 BALLOT MEASURES; AMENDING SECTION 13-27-605, MCA; REPEALING SECTION 3-2-202, MCA; AND
8 PROVIDING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE.”
9
10 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
11
12Section 1. Section 13-27-605, MCA, is amended to read:
13 "13-27-605. Court review of attorney general opinion or approved petitioner statements. (1) If
14 the proponents of a statewide ballot issue believe that the ballot statements approved by the attorney general
15 do not satisfy the requirements of 13-27-212 or 13-27-213 or believe that the attorney general was incorrect in
16 determining that the petition was legally deficient, they may, within 10 days of the attorney general's
17 determination regarding legal sufficiency provided for in 13-27-226, file an original proceeding in the supreme
18 court district court challenging the adequacy of the statement or the attorney general's determination and
19 requesting the court to alter the statement or modify the attorney general's determination.
20 (2) If the opponents of a statewide ballot issue believe that the petitioner ballot statements
21 approved by the attorney general do not satisfy the requirements of 13-27-212 or 13-27-213 or believe that the
22 attorney general was incorrect in determining that the petition was legally sufficient, they may, within 10 days of
23 the date of certification to the governor that the completed petition has been officially filed, file an original
24 proceeding in the supreme district court challenging the adequacy of the statement or the attorney general's
25 determination and requesting the court to alter the statement or overrule the attorney general's determination
26 concerning the legal sufficiency of the petition. The attorney general shall respond to a complaint within 5 days.
27 (3) (a) Notice must be served upon the secretary of state and upon the attorney general.
28 (b) If the proceeding requests modification of ballot statements, an action brought under this
****
69th Legislature 2025 SB 13.1
- 2 - Authorized Print Version – SB 13
1 section must state how the petitioner's ballot statements approved by the attorney general do not satisfy the
2 requirements of 13-27-212 or 13-27-213 and must propose alternate ballot statements that satisfy the
3 requirements of 13-27-212 and 13-27-213.
4 (c) (i) Pursuant to Article IV, section 7(2), of the Montana constitution, an action brought pursuant
5 to this section takes precedence over other cases and matters in the supreme district court. The court shall
6 examine the proposed issue and the challenged statement or determination of the attorney general and shall as
7 soon as possible render a decision as to the adequacy of the ballot statements or the correctness of the
8 attorney general's determination.
9 (ii) If the district court decides that the ballot statements do not meet the requirements of 13-27-
10 212 or 13-27-213, it may order the attorney general to revise the ballot statements within 5 days or certify to the
11 secretary of state ballot statements that the court determines will meet the requirements of 13-27-212 and 13-
12 27-213. A ballot statement revised by the attorney general pursuant to the court's order or certified by the court
13 must be placed on the petition for circulation and on the official ballot is appealable to the supreme court.
14 (iii) If the district court decides that the attorney general's legal sufficiency determination is
15 incorrect and that a proposed issue does not comply with statutory and constitutional requirements governing
16 submission of the issue to the electors, any petitions supporting the issue are void and the issue may not
17 appear on the ballot unless otherwise ordered by the supreme court. A proponent of the statewide ballot issue
18 may resubmit a revised issue, pursuant to 13-27-214, subject to the deadlines provided in this chapter.
19 (iv) If the district court decides that the attorney general's legal deficiency determination is incorrect
20 and that a proposed statewide ballot issue complies with statutory and constitutional requirements governing
21 submission of the issue to the electors, the attorney general shall prepare ballot statements that comply with
22 13-27-212 and 13-27-213 and forward the statements to the secretary of state within 5 days of the court's
23 decision. This decision is appealable to the supreme court.
24 (4) A petition may be circulated by a signature gatherer upon transmission of the sample petition
25 form by the secretary of state pending review under this section. If, upon review, the attorney general, or the
26 supreme district court, or supreme court revises the petition form or ballot statements, any petitions signed prior
27 to the revision are void.
28 (5) An original proceeding in the supreme district court under this section is the exclusive remedy
****
69th Legislature 2025 SB 13.1
- 3 - Authorized Print Version – SB 13
1 may be appealed to the supreme court for a challenge to the petitioner's ballot statements, as approved by the
2 attorney general, or the attorney general's legal sufficiency determination. A statewide ballot issue may not be
3 invalidated under this section after the secretary of state has certified the ballot under 13-12-201.
4 (6) This section does not limit the right to challenge a constitutional defect in the substance of an
5 issue approved by a vote of the people."
6
7 NEW SECTION. Section 2. Repealer. The following section of the Montana Code Annotated is
8 repealed:
9 3-2-202. Original jurisdiction -- review of ballot statements.
10
11 NEW SECTION. Section 3. Effective date. [This act] is effective on passage and approval.
12 - END -