Generally revise the Montana environmental policy act

- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 1 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
AN ACT PROVIDING FOR A GREENHOUSE GAS ASSESSMENT UNDER THE MONTANA
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT; REVISING DIRECTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS RELATED TO
GREENHOUSE GAS ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; AMENDING SECTIONS 75-1-201, 75-1-
202, AND 75-1-220, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Montana Supreme Court found that the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA)
"must be construed in harmony with the substantive limitations of an agency's applicable regulatory authority"
(paragraph 30, Bitterrooters for Planning, Inc. v. Montana Department of Environmental Quality, 2017 MT 222,
388 Mont. 453, 401 P.3d 712), but also found that the Legislature granted broad authority to the Department of
Environmental Quality (paragraph 53, Montana Environmental Information Center v. Department of
Environmental Quality, DA 23-0225 (2023)); and
WHEREAS, the Legislature is troubled by the court's overreach and strongly disagrees with the court's
Held decision but recognizes that without providing direction and clear statutory sideboard, there will be
regulatory uncertainty and unnecessary, expensive, and continued litigation; and
WHEREAS, the earth's climate has never been in stasis, and there are different scientific views of the
degree to which human activities are influencing current climatological trends and the degree to which the
curtailment of human activities would affect current trends; and
WHEREAS, the court notes that section 75-1-201(4)(a), MCA, clarifies that an "agency may not
withhold, deny, or impose conditions on any permit or other authority to act based on" MEPA alone. MEPA thus
provides a review process for an agency's permitting consideration; it is not a regulatory enforcement law.
MEPA expresses the Legislature's intent that state agencies fully consider all aspects of a proposal and ensure
that "the public is informed of the anticipated impacts in Montana of potential state actions" (paragraph 57,
Montana Environmental Information Center v. Department of Environmental Quality, DA 23-0225 (2023)); and
WHEREAS, the court stipulates that "we did not hold in Held, and do not hold here, that DEQ is
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 2 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
required to analyze GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions for every potential state action…nor do we hold that DEQ
must regulate GHG emissions in an air quality permit application"; and
WHEREAS, the court further stipulates the department's lack of substantive authority to regulate
greenhouse gases and lack of authority to grant or deny a permit based on greenhouse gas emissions does not
absolve the agency from conducting analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in a MEPA review (paragraph 58,
Montana Environmental Information Center v. Department of Environmental Quality, DA 23-0225 (2023)); and
WHEREAS, with the court's recognitions of the regulatory limitations of MEPA to deny a permit based
on greenhouse gas emissions analysis and the department's recognition of its "obligation to make an adequate
compilation of relevant information, to analyze it reasonably, and to consider all pertinent data," (paragraph 61,
Montana Environmental Information Center v. Department of Environmental Quality, DA 23-0225 (2023)), the
Legislature directs the department to conduct an analysis of greenhouse gas emissions for state actions
involving fossil fuel activities; and
WHEREAS, the Legislature stipulates that the greenhouse gas analysis is intended to satisfy the
informational requirements under MEPA and that greenhouse gases will not be regulated.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
Section 1. Greenhouse gas assessment. (1) Except as provided in 75-1-201(3), a state agency,
when conducting an environmental review in accordance with parts 1 through 3 of this chapter:
(a) may conduct a greenhouse gas assessment in accordance with 75-1-201 for a proposed action
if the agency determines the assessment is necessary to meet the requirements of parts 1 through 3 of this
chapter; or
(b) shall conduct a greenhouse gas assessment in accordance with 75-1-201 for a proposed
action that is defined as a fossil fuel activity as provided in 75-1-220.
(2) A greenhouse gas assessment is not required for a proposed action exempted from review
under parts 1 through 3 of this chapter or for categorical exclusions as provided in agency rules, programmatic
review, or statute.
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 3 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
Section 2. Section 75-1-201, MCA, is amended to read:
"75-1-201. General directions -- environmental impact statements. (1) The legislature authorizes
and directs that, to the fullest extent possible:
(a) the policies, regulations, and laws of the state must be interpreted and administered in
accordance with the policies set forth in parts 1 through 3;
(b) under this part, all agencies of the state, except the legislature and except as provided in
subsections (2) and (3) subsection (3), shall:
(i) use a systematic, interdisciplinary approach that will ensure:
(A) the integrated use of the natural and social sciences and the environmental design arts in
planning and in decisionmaking for a state-sponsored project that may have an impact on the Montana human
Montana's environment by projects in Montana; and
(B) that in any environmental review that is not subject to subsection (1)(b)(iv), when an agency
considers alternatives, the alternative analysis will be in compliance with the provisions of subsections
(1)(b)(iv)(C)(I) and (1)(b)(iv)(C)(II) and, if requested by the project sponsor or if determined by the agency to be
necessary, subsection (1)(b)(iv)(C)(III);
(ii) identify and develop methods and procedures that will ensure that presently unquantified
environmental amenities and values may be given appropriate consideration in decisionmaking for state-
sponsored projects, along with economic and technical considerations;
(iii) identify and develop methods and procedures that will ensure that state government actions
that may impact the human environment in Montana Montana's environment are evaluated for regulatory
restrictions on private property, as provided in subsection (1)(b)(iv)(D);
(iv) include in each recommendation or report on proposals for projects, programs, and other major
actions of state government significantly affecting the quality of the human environment in Montana Montana's
environment a detailed statement on:
(A) the proximate environmental impact impacts of the proposed action;
(B) any proximate adverse effects on Montana's environment that cannot be avoided if the
proposal proposed action is implemented;
(C) alternatives to the proposed action. An analysis of any alternative included in the environmental
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 4 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
review must comply with the following criteria:
(I) any alternative proposed must be reasonable, in that the alternative must be achievable under
current technology and the alternative must be economically feasible as determined solely by the economic
viability for similar projects having similar conditions and physical locations and determined without regard to
the economic strength of the specific project sponsor;
(II) the agency proposing the alternative shall consult with the project sponsor regarding any
proposed alternative, and the agency shall give due weight and consideration to the project sponsor's
comments regarding the proposed alternative;
(III) the agency shall complete a meaningful no-action alternative analysis. The no-action
alternative analysis must include the projected beneficial and adverse environmental, social, and economic
impact of the project's noncompletion.
(D) any regulatory impacts on private property rights, including whether alternatives that reduce,
minimize, or eliminate the regulation of private property rights have been analyzed. The analysis in this
subsection (1)(b)(iv)(D) need not be prepared if the proposed action does not involve the regulation of private
property.
(E) the relationship between local short-term uses of the Montana human Montana's environment
and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity;
(F) any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources that would be involved in the
proposed action if it is implemented;
(G) the customer fiscal impact analysis, if required by 69-2-216; and
(H) the details of the beneficial aspects of the proposed project, both short-term and long-term, and
the economic advantages and disadvantages of the proposal;
(v) in accordance with the criteria set forth in subsection (1)(b)(iv)(C), study, develop, and describe
appropriate alternatives to recommend courses of action in any proposal that involves unresolved conflicts
concerning alternative uses of available resources. If the alternatives analysis is conducted for a project that is
not a state-sponsored project and alternatives are recommended, the project sponsor may volunteer to
implement the alternative. Neither the alternatives analysis nor the resulting recommendations bind the project
sponsor to take a recommended course of action, but the project sponsor may agree pursuant to subsection
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 5 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
(4)(b) to a specific course of action.
(vi) recognize the potential long-range character of environmental impacts in Montana and, when
consistent with the policies of the state, lend appropriate support to initiatives, resolutions, and programs
designed to maximize cooperation in anticipating and preventing a decline in the quality of Montana's
environment;
(vii) make available to counties, municipalities, institutions, and individuals advice and information
useful in restoring, maintaining, and enhancing the quality of Montana's environment;
(viii) initiate and use ecological information in the planning and development of resource-oriented
projects; and
(ix) assist the legislature and the environmental quality council established by 5-16-101;
(c) prior to making any detailed statement as provided in subsection (1)(b)(iv), the responsible
state official shall consult with and obtain the comments of any state agency that has jurisdiction by law or
special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved in Montana and with any Montana local
government, as defined in 7-12-1103, that may be directly impacted by the project. The responsible state
official shall also consult with and obtain comments from any state agency in Montana with respect to any
regulation of private property involved. Copies of the statement and the comments and views of the appropriate
state, federal, and local agencies that are authorized to develop and enforce environmental standards must be
made available to the governor, the environmental quality council, and the public and must accompany the
proposal through the existing agency review processes.
(d) a transfer of an ownership interest in a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for
use or permission to act by an agency, either singly or in combination with other state agencies, does not
trigger review under subsection (1)(b)(iv) if there is not a material change in terms or conditions of the
entitlement or unless otherwise provided by law.
(2) (a) Except as provided in subsection (2)(b), an An environmental review conducted pursuant to
subsection (1) may not include an evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions and corresponding impacts to the
climate in the state or beyond the state's borders a greenhouse gas assessment subject to [section 1]. The
department of environmental quality shall develop a guidance document for use by state agencies to determine
when a greenhouse gas assessment may be necessary. The guidance must include direction on
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 6 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
methodologies for completing a greenhouse gas assessment. Prior to finalizing this guidance, the department
shall provide public notice of the draft guidance and allow for public comment.
(b) An environmental review conducted pursuant to subsection (1) may include an evaluation an
evaluation of the reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts of a proposed action if:
(i) conducted jointly by a state agency and a federal agency to the extent the review of the
expanded assessment is required by the federal agency; or
(ii) the United States congress amends the federal Clean Air Act to include carbon dioxide
emissions as a regulated pollutant.
(3) The department of public service regulation, in the exercise of its regulatory authority over rates
and charges of railroads, motor carriers, and public utilities, is exempt from the provisions of parts 1 through 3.
(4) (a) The agency may not withhold, deny, or impose conditions on any permit or other authority
to act based on parts 1 through 3 of this chapter.
(b) Nothing in this subsection (4) prevents a project sponsor and an agency from mutually
developing measures that may, at the request of a project sponsor, be incorporated into a permit or other
authority to act.
(c) Parts 1 through 3 of this chapter do not confer authority to an agency that is a project sponsor
to modify a proposed project or action.
(5) (a) (i) A challenge to an agency's environmental review under this part may only be brought
against a final agency action decision and may only be brought in district court or in federal court, whichever is
appropriate. A challenge may only be brought by a person who submits formal comments on the agency's
environmental review prior to the agency's final decision, and the challenge must be limited to those issues
addressed in those comments.
(ii) Any action or proceeding challenging a final agency action alleging failure to comply with or
inadequate compliance with a requirement under this part must be brought within 60 days of the action that is
the subject of the challenge.
(iii) For an action taken by the board of land commissioners or the department of natural resources
and conservation under Title 77, "final agency action" means the date that the board of land commissioners or
the department of natural resources and conservation issues a final environmental review document under this
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 7 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
part or the date that the board approves the action that is subject to this part, whichever is later.
(b) Any action or proceeding under subsection (5)(a)(ii) must take precedence over other cases or
matters in the district court unless otherwise provided by law.
(c) Any judicial action or proceeding brought in district court under subsection (5)(a) involving an
equine slaughter or processing facility must comply with 81-9-240 and 81-9-241.
(6) (a) (i) In an action alleging noncompliance or inadequate compliance with a requirement of
parts 1 through 3, including a challenge to an agency's decision that an environmental review is not required or
a claim that the environmental review is inadequate, the agency shall compile and submit to the court the
certified record of its decision at issue. The agency, prior to submitting the certified record to the court, shall
assess and collect from the person challenging the decision a fee to pay for actual costs to compile and submit
the certified record. Except as provided in subsection (6)(b), the person challenging the decision has the burden
of proving the claim by clear and convincing evidence contained in the record.
(ii) An action alleging noncompliance or inadequate compliance with a requirement of parts 1
through 3, including a challenge to an agency's decision that an environmental review is not required or a claim
that the environmental review is inadequate based in whole or in part upon greenhouse gas emissions and
impacts to the climate in Montana or beyond Montana's borders, cannot vacate, void, or delay a lease, permit,
license, certificate, authorization, or other entitlement or authority unless the review is required by a federal
agency or the United States congress amends the federal Clean Air Act to include carbon dioxide as a
regulated pollutant.
(iii)(ii) Except as provided in subsection (6)(b), in a challenge to the agency's decision or the
adequacy of an environmental review, a court may not consider any information, including but not limited to an
issue, comment, argument, proposed alternative, analysis, or evidence, that was not first presented to the
agency for the agency's consideration prior to the agency's decision or within the time allowed for comments to
be submitted.
(iv)(iii) Except as provided in subsection (6)(b), the court shall confine its review to the record certified
by the agency. The court shall affirm the agency's decision or the environmental review unless the court
specifically finds that the agency's decision was arbitrary and capricious.
(v)(iv) A customer fiscal impact analysis pursuant to 69-2-216 or an allegation that the customer fiscal
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 8 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
impact analysis is inadequate may not be used as the basis of an action challenging or seeking review of the
agency's decision.
(b) (i) When a party challenging the decision or the adequacy of the environmental review or
decision presents information not in the record certified by the agency, the challenging party shall certify under
oath in an affidavit that the information is new, material, and significant evidence that was not publicly available
before the agency's decision and that is relevant to the decision or the adequacy of the agency's environmental
review.
(ii) If upon reviewing the affidavit the court finds that the proffered information is new, material, and
significant evidence that was not publicly available before the agency's decision and that is relevant to the
decision or to the adequacy of the agency's environmental review, the court shall remand the new evidence to
the agency for the agency's consideration and an opportunity to modify its decision or environmental review
before the court considers the evidence as a part of the administrative record under review.
(iii) If the court finds that the information in the affidavit does not meet the requirements of
subsection (6)(b)(i), the court may not remand the matter to the agency or consider the proffered information in
making its decision.
(c) (i) The remedies provided in this section for successful challenges to a decision of the agency
or the adequacy of the statement are exclusive.
(ii) Notwithstanding the provisions of 27-19-201 and 27-19-314, a court having considered the
pleadings of parties and intervenors opposing a request for a temporary restraining order, preliminary
injunction, permanent injunction, or other equitable relief may not enjoin the issuance or effectiveness of a
license or permit or a part of a license or permit issued pursuant to Title 75 or Title 82 unless the court
specifically finds that the party requesting the relief is more likely than not to prevail on the merits of its
complaint given the uncontroverted facts in the record and applicable law and, in the absence of a temporary
restraining order, a preliminary injunction, a permanent injunction, or other equitable relief, that the:
(A) party requesting the relief will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of the relief;
(B) issuance of the relief is in the public interest. In determining whether the grant of the relief is in
the public interest, a court:
(I) may not consider the legal nature or character of any party; and
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 9 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
(II) shall consider the implications of the relief on the local and state economy and make written
findings with respect to both.
(C) relief is as narrowly tailored as the facts allow to address both the alleged noncompliance and
the irreparable harm the party asking for the relief will suffer. In tailoring the relief, the court shall ensure, to the
extent possible, that the project or as much of the project as possible can go forward while also providing the
relief to which the applicant has been determined to be entitled.
(d) The court may issue a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, permanent
injunction, or other injunctive relief only if the party seeking the relief provides a written undertaking to the court
in an amount reasonably calculated by the court as adequate to pay the costs and damages sustained by any
party that may be found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained by a court through a subsequent judicial
decision in the case, including but not limited to lost wages of employees and lost project revenues for 1 year. If
the party seeking an injunction or a temporary restraining order objects to the amount of the written undertaking
for any reason, including but not limited to its asserted inability to pay, that party shall file an affidavit with the
court that states the party's income, assets, and liabilities in order to facilitate the court's consideration of the
amount of the written undertaking that is required. The affidavit must be served on the party enjoined. If a
challenge for noncompliance or inadequate compliance with a requirement of parts 1 through 3 seeks to
vacate, void, or delay a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement or authority, the party shall, as an
initial matter, seek an injunction related to a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement or authority,
and an injunction may only be issued if the challenger:
(i) proves there is a likelihood of succeeding on the merits;
(ii) proves there is a violation of an established law or regulation on which the lease, permit,
license, certificate, or other entitlement or authority is based; and
(iii) subject to the demonstration of the inability to pay, posts the appropriate written undertaking.
(e) An individual or entity seeking a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement or
authority to act may intervene in a lawsuit in court challenging a decision or statement by a department or
agency of the state as a matter of right if the individual or entity has not been named as a defendant.
(f) Attorney fees or costs may not be awarded to the prevailing party in an action alleging
noncompliance or inadequate compliance with a requirement of parts 1 through 3.
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 10 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
(7) For purposes of judicial review, to the extent that the requirements of this section are
inconsistent with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, the requirements of this section apply
to an environmental review or any severable portion of an environmental review within the state's jurisdiction
that is being prepared by a state agency pursuant to this part in conjunction with a federal agency proceeding
pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act.
(8) The director of the agency responsible for the determination or recommendation shall endorse
in writing any determination of significance made under subsection (1)(b)(iv) or any recommendation that a
determination of significance be made.
(9) A project sponsor may request a review of the significance determination or recommendation
made under subsection (8) by the appropriate board, if any. The appropriate board may, at its discretion, submit
an advisory recommendation to the agency regarding the issue. The period of time between the request for a
review and completion of a review under this subsection may not be included for the purposes of determining
compliance with the time limits established for environmental review in 75-1-208."
Section 3. Section 75-1-202, MCA, is amended to read:
"75-1-202. Agency rules to prescribe fees. Each agency of state government charged with the
responsibility of issuing a lease, permit, contract, license, or certificate under any provision of state law may
adopt rules prescribing fees that must be paid by a person, corporation, partnership, firm, association, or other
private entity when an application for a lease, permit, contract, license, or certificate will require an agency to
compile an environmental impact statement as prescribed by 75-1-201 and the agency has not made the
finding under 75-1-205(1)(a). An agency shall determine whether it will be necessary to compile an
environmental impact statement and assess a fee as prescribed by this section within any statutory timeframe
for issuance of the lease, permit, contract, license, or certificate or, if no statutory timeframe is provided, within
90 days. Except as provided in 85-2-124, the fee assessed under this section may be used only to gather data
and information necessary to compile an environmental impact statement as defined in parts 1 through 3. A fee
may not be assessed if an agency intends only to file a negative declaration stating that the proposed project
will not have a significant impact on the human Montana's environment."
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 11 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
Section 4. Section 75-1-220, MCA, is amended to read:
"75-1-220. Definitions. For the purposes of this part, the following definitions apply:
(1) "Alternatives analysis" means an evaluation of different parameters, mitigation measures, or
control measures that would accomplish the same objectives as those included in the proposed action by the
applicant. For a project that is not a state-sponsored project, it does not include an alternative facility or an
alternative to the proposed project itself. The term includes alternatives required pursuant to Title 75, chapter
20.
(2) "Appropriate board" means, for administrative actions taken under this part by the:
(a) department of environmental quality, the board of environmental review, as provided for in 2-
15-3502;
(b) department of fish, wildlife, and parks, the fish and wildlife commission, as provided for in 2-15-
3402, and the state parks and recreation board, as provided for in 2-15-3406;
(c) department of transportation, the transportation commission, as provided for in 2-15-2502;
(d) department of natural resources and conservation for state trust land issues, the board of land
commissioners, as provided for in Article X, section 4, of the Montana constitution;
(e) department of natural resources and conservation for oil and gas issues, the board of oil and
gas conservation, as provided for in 2-15-3303; and
(f) department of livestock, the board of livestock, as provided for in 2-15-3102.
(3) "Complete application" means, for the purpose of complying with this part, an application for a
permit, license, or other authorization that contains all data, studies, plans, information, forms, fees, and
signatures required to be included with the application sufficient for the agency to approve the application under
the applicable statutes and rules.
(4) "Cumulative impacts" means the collective impacts on the human environment within the
borders of Montana Montana's environment of the proposed action when considered in conjunction with other
past, present, and future actions related to the proposed action by location or generic type.
(5) "Economic impacts" or "socioeconomic impacts" means the financial impacts that may occur to
Montana's local economy if the proposed action occurs.
(5)(6) "Environmental review" means any environmental assessment, environmental impact
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 12 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
statement, or other written analysis required under this part by a state agency of a proposed action to
determine, examine, or document the effects and impacts of the proposed action on the quality of the human
and physical environment within the borders of Montana Montana's environment as required under this part.
(7) (a) "Fossil fuel activity" means a proposed action that authorizes the mining of coal, drilling for
oil or natural gas, production of oil or natural gas, compression of oil or natural gas, or burning of coal, oil, or
natural gas to generate energy for electricity.
(b) The term does not include:
(i) burning biomass for electricity or industrial purposes;
(ii) transportation or transportation-related activities, including rail activities; or
(iii) a water quality-related or a water quantity-related lease, permit, license, certificate, or other
entitlement for use or permission to act by a state agency for fossil fuel activities.
(8) "Greenhouse gas emissions" means carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide,
hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride.
(6)(9) "Project sponsor" means any applicant, owner, operator, agency, or other entity that is
proposing an action that requires an environmental review. If the action involves state agency-initiated actions
on state trust lands, the term also includes each institutional beneficiary of any trust as described in The
Enabling Act of Congress, approved February 22, 1899, 25 Stat. 676, as amended, the Morrill Act of 1862, 7
U.S.C. 301 through 308, and the Morrill Act of 1890, 7 U.S.C. 321 through 329.
(10) (a) "Proposed action" means a project, program, or activity:
(i) to be directly implemented by an agency;
(ii) to be supported through a contract, grant, subsidy, loan, or other form of financial assistance
from an agency either singly or in combination with other state agencies; or
(iii) requiring the issuance of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use or
permission to act by the agency either singly or in combination with other state agencies, except as provided in
77-1-121.
(b) The term does not mean:
(i) an upstream, downstream, or other indirect action that occurs independently or is caused in
part or exclusively by the proposed action; or
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 13 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
(ii) an action that occurs regardless of the proposed action.
(7)(11) "Public scoping process" means any process to determine the scope of an environmental
review.
(8)(12) (a) "State-sponsored project" means:
(i) a project, program, or activity initiated and directly undertaken by a state agency;
(ii) except as provided in subsection (8)(b)(i) (12)(b)(i), a project or activity supported through a
contract, grant, subsidy, loan, or other form of funding assistance from a state agency, either singly or in
combination with one or more other state agencies; or
(iii) except as provided in subsection (8)(b)(i) (12)(b)(i), a project or activity authorized by a state
agency acting in a land management capacity for a lease, easement, license, or other authorization to act.
(b) The term does not include:
(i) a project or activity undertaken by a private entity that is made possible by the issuance of
permits, licenses, leases, easements, grants, loans, or other authorizations to act by the:
(A) department of environmental quality pursuant to Titles 75, 76, or 82;
(B) department of fish, wildlife, and parks pursuant to Title 87, chapter 4, part 4;
(C) board of oil and gas conservation pursuant to Title 82, chapter 11; or
(D) department of natural resources and conservation or the board of land commissioners pursuant
to Titles 76, 77, 82, and 85; or
(ii) a project or activity involving the issuance of a permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement
for permission to act by another agency acting in a regulatory capacity, either singly or in combination with
other state agencies."
Section 5. Codification instruction. [Section 1] is intended to be codified as an integral part of Title
75, chapter 1, part 2, and the provisions of Title 75, chapter 1, part 2, apply to [section 1].
Section 6. Severability. If a part of [this act] is invalid, all valid parts that are severable from the
invalid part remain in effect. If a part of [this act] is invalid in one or more of its applications, the part remains in
effect in all valid applications that are severable from the invalid applications.
- 2025
69th Legislature 2025 SB 221
- 14 - Authorized Print Version – SB 221
ENROLLED BILL
Section 7. Effective date. [This act] is effective on passage and approval.
- END -
I hereby certify that the within bill,
SB 221, originated in the Senate.
___________________________________________
Secretary of the Senate
___________________________________________
President of the Senate
Signed this _______________________________day
of____________________________________, 2025.
___________________________________________
Speaker of the House
Signed this _______________________________day
of____________________________________, 2025.
SENATE BILL NO. 221
INTRODUCED BY W. GALT, M. VINTON, E. ALBUS, C. COCHRAN, S. GIST, C. SPRUNGER, D. LOGE, M.
REGIER, S. VINTON, M. YAKAWICH, S. FITZPATRICK, B. LER, J. SCHILLINGER, G. OBLANDER, K.
ZOLNIKOV, B. USHER, T. MCGILLVRAY, S. MANESS, K. BOGNER, B. BEARD
AN ACT PROVIDING FOR A GREENHOUSE GAS ASSESSMENT UNDER THE MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL
POLICY ACT; REVISING DIRECTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS RELATED TO GREENHOUSE
GAS ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; AMENDING SECTIONS 75-1-201, 75-1-202, AND 75-1-
220, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.