Back to Montana

SB48 • 2025

Generally revise laws relating to Judicial Standards Commission complaints

Generally revise laws relating to Judicial Standards Commission complaints

Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Carl Glimm
Last action
2025-05-13
Official status
Chapter Number Assigned
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Generally revise laws relating to Judicial Standards Commission complaints

Generally revise laws relating to Judicial Standards Commission complaints

What This Bill Does

  • Generally revise laws relating to Judicial Standards Commission complaints

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

COMMITTEE

Plain English: Amendment - 2nd Reading-yellow - Requested by: Laura Smith - (S) Committee of the Whole - 2025 69th Legislature 2025 Drafter: Julianne Burkhardt, SB0048.001.002 - 1 - Authorized Print Version – SB 48 1 SENATE BILL NO.

  • Amendment - 2nd Reading-yellow - Requested by: Laura Smith - (S) Committee of the Whole - 2025 69th Legislature 2025 Drafter: Julianne Burkhardt, SB0048.001.002 - 1 - Authorized Print Version – SB 48 1 SENATE BILL NO.
  • 48 2 INTRODUCED BY C.
  • GLIMM 3 BY REQUEST OF THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT AND REFORM 4 5 A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: “AN ACT REVISING COMPLAINT PROCESSES WITH THE JUDICIAL 6 STANDARDS COMMISSION TO ALLOW A CITIZEN TO MAKE PUBLIC THE CITIZEN'S COMPLAINTS 7 CONCERNING A JUDGE AT ANY TIME FOLLOWING THE COMMISSION’S FINDING OF GOOD CAUSE TO 8 ORDER A HEARING; AND AMENDING SECTIONS 3-1-1106 AND 3-1-1123, MCA.” 9 10 WHEREAS, the Judicial Standards Commission generally requires the complaint process against 11 judicial officers to be confidential, including requiring confidentiality from the citizen making the complaint; and 12 WHEREAS, the Legislature maintains that a citizen should not be forced to choose between filing a 13 complaint against a judicial officer and the citizen's right of free speech concerning the alleged misconduct of 14 the judicial officer.
  • 15 16 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA: 17 18Section 1.
FLOOR

Plain English: FLOOR 2

  • The official amendment file could not be read automatically during the last sync, so only the official amendment metadata is shown right now.

Bill History

  1. 2025-05-13 SENATE

    Chapter Number Assigned

  2. 2025-05-08 SENATE

    (S) Signed by Governor

  3. 2025-04-30 SENATE

    (S) Transmitted to Governor

  4. 2025-04-29 HOUSE

    (H) Signed by Speaker

  5. 2025-04-21 SENATE

    (S) Signed by President

  6. 2025-04-14 SENATE

    (S) Returned from Enrolling

  7. 2025-04-11 HOUSE

    (H) Scheduled for 3rd Reading

  8. 2025-04-11 HOUSE

    (H) 3rd Reading Concurred

  9. 2025-04-11 SENATE

    (S) Sent to Enrolling

  10. 2025-04-10 HOUSE

    (H) Scheduled for 2nd Reading

  11. 2025-04-10 HOUSE

    (H) 2nd Reading Concurred

  12. 2025-04-08 HOUSE

    (H) Committee Executive Action--Bill Concurred

  13. 2025-04-08 HOUSE

    (H) Committee Report--Bill Concurred

  14. 2025-04-03 HOUSE

    (H) Hearing

  15. 2025-01-31 HOUSE

    (H) Referred to Committee

  16. 2025-01-31 HOUSE

    (H) First Reading

  17. 2025-01-30 SENATE

    (S) Scheduled for 3rd Reading

  18. 2025-01-30 SENATE

    (S) 3rd Reading Passed

  19. 2025-01-30 SENATE

    (S) Transmitted to House

  20. 2025-01-29 SENATE

    (S) Scheduled for 2nd Reading

  21. 2025-01-29 SENATE

    (S) 2nd Reading Motion to Amend Failed

  22. 2025-01-29 SENATE

    (S) 2nd Reading Passed

  23. 2025-01-28 SENATE

    (S) 2nd Reading Pass Consideration

  24. 2025-01-24 SENATE

    (S) Committee Executive Action--Bill Passed

  25. 2025-01-24 SENATE

    (S) Committee Report--Bill Passed

  26. 2025-01-11 SENATE

    (S) Hearing

  27. 2025-01-07 SENATE

    (S) Referred to Committee

  28. 2025-01-06 SENATE

    (S) First Reading

  29. 2024-12-12 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft Delivered to Requester

  30. 2024-12-12 SENATE

    (S) Introduced

  31. 2024-12-10 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft Ready for Delivery

  32. 2024-12-09 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Final Drafter Review

  33. 2024-12-09 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Assembly

  34. 2024-12-05 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Input/Proofing

  35. 2024-11-26 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Legal Review

  36. 2024-11-26 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Edit

  37. 2024-10-24 HOUSE

    (LC) Drafter Assigned

Official Summary Text

Generally revise laws relating to Judicial Standards Commission complaints

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
****
69th Legislature 2025 SB 48
- 1 - Authorized Print Version – SB 48
ENROLLED BILL
AN ACT REVISING COMPLAINT PROCESSES WITH THE JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION TO
ALLOW A CITIZEN TO MAKE PUBLIC THE CITIZEN'S COMPLAINTS CONCERNING A JUDGE AT ANY
TIME; AND AMENDING SECTIONS 3-1-1106 AND 3-1-1123, MCA.
WHEREAS, the Judicial Standards Commission generally requires the complaint process against
judicial officers to be confidential, including requiring confidentiality from the citizen making the complaint; and
WHEREAS, the Legislature maintains that a citizen should not be forced to choose between filing a
complaint against a judicial officer and the citizen's right of free speech concerning the alleged misconduct of
the judicial officer.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
Section 1. Section 3-1-1106, MCA, is amended to read:
"3-1-1106. Investigation of judicial officers -- complaint -- hearing -- recommendations. (1) (a)
The commission, upon the filing of a written complaint by any citizen of the state, shall initiate an investigation
of any judicial officer in the state to determine if there are grounds for conducting additional proceedings before
the commission. If the commission's investigation indicates that additional proceedings before the commission
may be justified, the commission shall require the citizen who filed the original written complaint to sign a
verified written complaint by affidavit before conducting additional proceedings. A citizen has the right to make
public the citizen's complaints concerning a judicial officer at any time.
(b) The commission shall give the judicial officer written notice of the citizen's complaint and of the
initiation of an investigation. Notice must also be given if a verified written complaint by affidavit is filed and
must include the charges made, the grounds for the charges, and a statement that the judicial officer may file
an answer. The notice must be signed by the commission.
****
69th Legislature 2025 SB 48
- 2 - Authorized Print Version – SB 48
ENROLLED BILL
(2) The commission, after an investigation that it considers necessary and on a finding of good
cause, shall:
(a) order a hearing to be held before it concerning the censure, suspension, removal, or retirement
of a judicial officer;
(b) publicly advise the judicial officer and the supreme court, in writing, that the complaint will be
dismissed if the judicial officer files with the commission a letter stating that the officer will take corrective action
satisfactory to the commission; or
(c) request that the supreme court appoint one or more special masters who are judges of courts
of record to hear and take evidence and to report to the commission.
(3) If after a hearing or after considering the record and the report of the masters the commission
finds the charges true, it shall publicly recommend to the supreme court the censure, suspension, removal, or
disability retirement of the judicial officer."
Section 2. Section 3-1-1123, MCA, is amended to read:
"3-1-1123. Public statements by commission. In any case in which the subject matter becomes
public, through the citizen complainant, through independent sources, through a waiver of confidentiality by the
judge against whom the complaint has been filed, or under other circumstances as the commission considers
appropriate, the commission may issue statements as it considers appropriate in order to:
(1) confirm the pendency of the investigation;
(2) clarify the procedural aspects of the disciplinary proceedings;
(3) explain the right of the judge to a fair hearing without prejudgment;
(4) state that the judge denies the allegations; or
(5) declare that there is insufficient evidence for a finding of good cause."
- END -
I hereby certify that the within bill,
SB 48, originated in the Senate.
___________________________________________
Secretary of the Senate
___________________________________________
President of the Senate
Signed this _______________________________day
of____________________________________, 2025.
___________________________________________
Speaker of the House
Signed this _______________________________day
of____________________________________, 2025.
SENATE BILL NO. 48
INTRODUCED BY C. GLIMM
BY REQUEST OF THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT AND REFORM
AN ACT REVISING COMPLAINT PROCESSES WITH THE JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION TO ALLOW
A CITIZEN TO MAKE PUBLIC THE CITIZEN'S COMPLAINTS CONCERNING A JUDGE AT ANY TIME; AND
AMENDING SECTIONS 3-1-1106 AND 3-1-1123, MCA.