Back to Montana

SB97 • 2025

Revise venue laws for cases challenging constitutionality of recent laws

Revise venue laws for cases challenging constitutionality of recent laws

Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
John Fuller
Last action
2025-05-08
Official status
Chapter Number Assigned
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Revise venue laws for cases challenging constitutionality of recent laws

Revise venue laws for cases challenging constitutionality of recent laws

What This Bill Does

  • Revise venue laws for cases challenging constitutionality of recent laws

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2025-05-08 SENATE

    Chapter Number Assigned

  2. 2025-05-05 SENATE

    (S) Signed by Governor

  3. 2025-04-25 HOUSE

    (H) Signed by Speaker

  4. 2025-04-25 SENATE

    (S) Transmitted to Governor

  5. 2025-04-21 SENATE

    (S) Signed by President

  6. 2025-04-12 SENATE

    (S) Returned from Enrolling

  7. 2025-04-11 HOUSE

    (H) Scheduled for 3rd Reading

  8. 2025-04-11 HOUSE

    (H) 3rd Reading Concurred

  9. 2025-04-11 SENATE

    (S) Sent to Enrolling

  10. 2025-04-10 HOUSE

    (H) Scheduled for 2nd Reading

  11. 2025-04-10 HOUSE

    (H) 2nd Reading Concurred

  12. 2025-04-08 HOUSE

    (H) Committee Executive Action--Bill Concurred

  13. 2025-04-08 HOUSE

    (H) Committee Report--Bill Concurred

  14. 2025-04-03 HOUSE

    (H) Hearing

  15. 2025-02-03 HOUSE

    (H) Referred to Committee

  16. 2025-02-03 HOUSE

    (H) First Reading

  17. 2025-01-31 SENATE

    (S) Scheduled for 3rd Reading

  18. 2025-01-31 SENATE

    (S) 3rd Reading Passed

  19. 2025-01-31 SENATE

    (S) Transmitted to House

  20. 2025-01-30 SENATE

    (S) Scheduled for 2nd Reading

  21. 2025-01-30 SENATE

    (S) 2nd Reading Passed

  22. 2025-01-23 SENATE

    (S) 2nd Reading Pass Consideration

  23. 2025-01-22 SENATE

    (S) Committee Executive Action--Bill Passed

  24. 2025-01-22 SENATE

    (S) Committee Report--Bill Passed

  25. 2025-01-15 SENATE

    (S) Fiscal Note Printed

  26. 2025-01-14 SENATE

    (S) Fiscal Note Received

  27. 2025-01-14 SENATE

    (S) Fiscal Note Signed

  28. 2025-01-13 SENATE

    (S) Referred to Committee

  29. 2025-01-13 SENATE

    (S) Hearing

  30. 2025-01-07 SENATE

    (S) First Reading

  31. 2025-01-06 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft Delivered to Requester

  32. 2025-01-06 SENATE

    (S) Introduced

  33. 2025-01-06 SENATE

    (S) Fiscal Note Requested

  34. 2024-12-09 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Assembly

  35. 2024-12-09 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft Ready for Delivery

  36. 2024-11-21 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Final Drafter Review

  37. 2024-11-13 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Input/Proofing

  38. 2024-10-29 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Edit

  39. 2024-09-27 HOUSE

    (LC) Draft in Legal Review

  40. 2024-08-28 HOUSE

    (LC) Drafter Assigned

Official Summary Text

Revise venue laws for cases challenging constitutionality of recent laws

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
****
69th Legislature 2025 SB 97
- 1 - Authorized Print Version – SB 97
ENROLLED BILL
AN ACT REVISING VENUE LAWS FOR CASES IN WHICH PARTIES CHALLENGE RECENTLY ENACTED
LAW; PROVIDING THAT VENUE IS PROPER IN A COUNTY WHOLLY OR PARTIALLY WITHIN THE
LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT OF THE PRIMARY SPONSOR OF THE CHALLENGED LAW; REQUIRING
CHANGE OF VENUE TO A COUNTY WHOLLY OR PARTIALLY WITHIN THE LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT OF
THE PRIMARY SPONSOR OF THE CHALLENGED LAW WHEN A PARTY PLEADS THAT A RECENTLY
ENACTED LAW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; AND AMENDING SECTIONS 25-2-
118, 25-2-125, 25-2-126, AND 25-2-201, MCA.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
Section 1. Challenge to recently enacted law. (1) The proper place of trial for an action that
challenges a statute or session law enacted or amended within the legislative biennium is in a county that is
wholly or partially within the legislative district of the primary sponsor of the bill that enacted or amended the
statute or session law.
(2) As used in this section, the following definitions apply:
(a) "Challenge" means:
(i) to plead that a statute or session law is unconstitutional under a provision of the state or federal
constitution; or
(ii) to seek an injunction against the execution of a statute.
(b) "Legislative biennium" means a 2-year period beginning on the first Monday of January of an
odd-numbered year and ending the day before the first Monday of January of the next odd-numbered year.
Section 2. Section 25-2-118, MCA, is amended to read:
"25-2-118. Residence of defendant. (1) Except as provided in [section 1] and subsection (3) of this
****
69th Legislature 2025 SB 97
- 2 - Authorized Print Version – SB 97
ENROLLED BILL
section, the proper place of trial for all civil actions is the county in which the defendants or any of them reside
at the commencement of the action.
(2) If none of the defendants reside in the state, the proper place of trial for a contract action is as
provided in 25-2-121(1)(b) or (2) and the proper place of trial for a tort action is as provided in 25-2-122(2) or
(3).
(3) The proper place of trial for an action brought pursuant to Title 40, chapter 4, is the county in
which the petitioner or the respondent has resided during the 90 days preceding the filing of the action."
Section 3. Section 25-2-125, MCA, is amended to read:
"25-2-125. Against public officers or their agents. The Except as provided in [section 1], the proper
place of trial for an action against a public officer or person specially appointed to execute the officer's duties for
an act done by the officer or person in virtue of the office or against a person who, by the officer's or person's
command or in the officer's or person's aid, does anything relating to the duties of the officer is the county
where the cause or some part of the cause of action arose."
Section 4. Section 25-2-126, MCA, is amended to read:
"25-2-126. Against state and political subdivisions. (1) Except as provided in [section 1] and
subsection (2) of this section, the proper place of trial for an action against the state is in the county in which the
claim arose or in Lewis and Clark County. In an action against the state brought by a resident of the state, the
county of the plaintiff's residence is also a proper place of trial.
(2) For an action that challenges the issuance, approval, renewal, or denial of a permit, license,
authorization, or certificate by a state agency, the action must be brought in the county in which the permitted,
licensed, authorized, or certificated activity would occur. If an activity would occur in more than one county, any
county in which the activity would occur is a proper place for an action.
(3) The proper place of trial for an action against a political subdivision is in the county in which the
claim arose or in any county where the political subdivision is located."
Section 5. Section 25-2-201, MCA, is amended to read:
****
69th Legislature 2025 SB 97
- 3 - Authorized Print Version – SB 97
ENROLLED BILL
"25-2-201. When change of venue required. The court or judge must shall, on motion, change the
place of trial in the following cases:
(1) when the county designated in the complaint is not the proper county;
(2) when there is reason to believe that an impartial trial cannot be had therein in the current place
of trial;
(3) when the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change;
(4) when a party enters a pleading that challenges, as defined in [section 1], a statute or session
law if the statute or session law was enacted or amended within the legislative biennium, as defined in [section
1]; and
(5) when a primary bill sponsor intervenes pursuant to 5-2-107 in a declaratory judgment action."
Section 6. Codification instruction. [Section 1] is intended to be codified as an integral part of Title
25, chapter 2, part 1, and the provisions of Title 25, chapter 2, part 1, apply to [section 1].
Section 7. Saving clause. [This act] does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that
were incurred, or proceedings that were begun before [the effective date of this act].
- END -
I hereby certify that the within bill,
SB 97, originated in the Senate.
___________________________________________
Secretary of the Senate
___________________________________________
President of the Senate
Signed this _______________________________day
of____________________________________, 2025.
___________________________________________
Speaker of the House
Signed this _______________________________day
of____________________________________, 2025.
SENATE BILL NO. 97
INTRODUCED BY J. FULLER
AN ACT REVISING VENUE LAWS FOR CASES IN WHICH PARTIES CHALLENGE RECENTLY ENACTED
LAW; PROVIDING THAT VENUE IS PROPER IN A COUNTY WHOLLY OR PARTIALLY WITHIN THE
LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT OF THE PRIMARY SPONSOR OF THE CHALLENGED LAW; REQUIRING CHANGE
OF VENUE TO A COUNTY WHOLLY OR PARTIALLY WITHIN THE LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT OF THE
PRIMARY SPONSOR OF THE CHALLENGED LAW WHEN A PARTY PLEADS THAT A RECENTLY ENACTED
LAW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; AND AMENDING SECTIONS 25-2-118, 25-2-125,
25-2-126, AND 25-2-201, MCA.