Back to Nevada

AB250 • 2025

Revises provisions relating to certain debt. (BDR 52-599)

AN ACT relating to debt; establishing coerced debt as an affirmative defense in certain civil actions to collect an unsecured consumer debt; setting forth requirements for asserting the affirmative defense of coerced debt; requiring a court to take certain actions upon finding that a debt is a coerced debt; authorizing certain claims and remedies; revising provisions governing the presumption of intent to defraud in the issuance of certain instruments; and providing other matters properly relating thereto. Close title AN ACT relating to debt; establishing coerced debt as an affirmative defense in certain civil actions to collect an unsecured consumer debt; setting forth requirements for asserting the affirmative defense of coerced debt; requiring a court to take certain actions upon finding that a debt is a coerced debt; authorizing certain claims and remedies; revising provisions governing the presumption of intent to defraud in the issuance of certain instruments; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.

Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
View 1 Primary Sponsors Close Primary Sponsors Assemblymember Heather Goulding
Last action
Official status
Approved by the Governor. Chapter 240. (See full list below)
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Revises provisions relating to certain debt. (BDR 52-599)

Revises provisions relating to certain debt.

What This Bill Does

  • Revises provisions relating to certain debt.
  • (BDR 52-599)

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Adopted Amendments

Plain English: 2025 Session (83rd) A AB250 442 KRO/BAW - Date: 4/17/2025 A.B.

  • 2025 Session (83rd) A AB250 442 KRO/BAW - Date: 4/17/2025 A.B.
  • No.
  • 250—Revises provisions relating to certain debt.
  • (BDR 52-599) Page 1 of 8 *A_AB250_442* Amendment No.
Adopted Amendments

Plain English: 2025 Session (83rd) A AB250 R1 592 KRO/BAW - Date: 5/18/2025 A.B.

  • 2025 Session (83rd) A AB250 R1 592 KRO/BAW - Date: 5/18/2025 A.B.
  • No.
  • 250—Revises provisions relating to certain debt.
  • (BDR 52-599) Page 1 of 5 *A_AB250_R1_592* Amendment No.
Adopted Amendments

Plain English: 2025 Session (83rd) A AB250 R2 734 KRO/BAW - Date: 5/21/2025 A.B.

  • 2025 Session (83rd) A AB250 R2 734 KRO/BAW - Date: 5/21/2025 A.B.
  • No.
  • 250—Revises provisions relating to certain debt.
  • (BDR 52-599) Page 1 of 5 *A_AB250_R2_734* Amendment No.

Bill History

  1. 2025-02-18 Nevada Electronic Legislative Information System

    Approved by the Governor. Chapter 240. (See full list below)

Official Summary Text

Revises provisions relating to certain debt. (BDR 52-599)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
- 83rd Session (2025)
Assembly Bill No. 250–Assemblymembers Goulding; Anderson,
Flanagan, Hunt, La Rue Hatch and Nguyen

Joint Sponsors: Senators Krasner and Steinbeck

CHAPTER..........

AN ACT relating to debt; establishing coerced debt as an
affirmative defense in certain civil actions to collect an
unsecured consumer debt; setting forth requirements for
asserting the affirmative defense of coerced debt; requiring a
court to take certain actions upon finding that a debt is a
coerced debt; authorizing certain claims and remedies;
revising provisions governing the presumption of intent to
defraud in the issuanc e of certain instruments; and providing
other matters properly relating thereto.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
Existing law governs the collection of debt by certain persons in this State,
including, without limitation, collection agencies and private debt collectors. ( See,
e.g., chapters 353C and 649 of NRS) Section 1 of this bill establishes that , in any
civil action to collect an unsecured consumer debt, a debtor may assert as an
affirmative defense that the debt is a coerced debt. Section 1 also: (1) sets forth the
requirements for asserting the affirmative defense of coerced debt; and (2) requires
a court, upon finding that a debt is a coerced debt, to order the creditor to cease
collection efforts and, if applicable, correct certain records. In add ition, section 1
authorizes: (1) the creditor to join a third party who may be liable for the coerced
debt or amend its complaint to assert a claim against any such person; and (2) the
debtor to recover attorney’s fees and costs from the person who coerced the debt.
Existing law makes it a crime to issue a check or draft against insufficient or no
funds with intent to defraud. (NRS 205.130) Under existing law, intent to defraud
and knowledge of insufficient funds are presumed to exist if payment of the
instrument is refused by the drawee when presented in the usual course of business,
unless the drawer pays the full amount due within 5 days after receiving notice
from the drawee or the holder. (NRS 205.132) Section 1.5 of this bill provides that,
for the pu rpose of determining whether a check or draft is presented in the usual
course of business, a check or draft that constitutes a credit instrument is deemed to
be presented in the usual course of business if it is presented not more than 2 years
after the date on which the credit instrument is issued.

– 2 –

- 83rd Session (2025)
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new; matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Chapter 597 of NRS is hereby amended by adding
thereto a new section to read as follows:
1. In any civil action to collect an unsecured consumer debt,
it is an affirmative defense under applicable court rules that the
debt is a coerced debt.
2. To assert the affirmative defense of coerced debt, a debtor
must submit to the court:
(a) A written attestation that includes, without limitation:
(1) A statement that clearly identifies the specific debt the
debtor asserts is a coerced debt;
(2) A description of the circumstances under which the
alleged coerced debt was incurred, including specific facts
supporting the allegation;
(3) Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4 , any
information known to the debtor regarding the identity and
contact information of the person alleged to have coerced the
debtor into incurring the debt; and
(4) A statement indicating the number of times the debtor
has previously asserted the affirmative defense of coerced debt in
any action or proceeding before a court in this State or any other
state, including whether each such assertion was successful or
unsuccessful; and
(b) A copy of at least one of the following documents:
(1) A police report, investigative report or complaint which
the debtor filed with a law enforcement agency that is relevant to
establishing that the debt is a coerced debt;
(2) A report filed with the Federal Trade Comm ission
indicating that the debtor is a victim of identity theft; or
(3) A temporary or extended order for protection against
domestic violence issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or
other court record that is relevant to establishing that the deb t is a
coerced debt.
3. If the court determines that the debt identified by the
debtor pursuant to subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) of
subsection 2 constitutes a coerced debt:
(a) The court shall order the creditor to immediately cease all
collection efforts related to the coerced debt and, if applicable, to

– 3 –

- 83rd Session (2025)
take reasonable steps to correct any consumer credit report or
similar record to reflect that the debt is a coerced debt;
(b) The creditor may join any third party who is or may be
liable for the coerced debt or amend its complaint to assert a claim
against any such person; and
(c) The debtor is entitled to recover from the person who
coerced the debtor into incurring the coerced debt reasonable
attorney’s fees and costs, but may not recover such f ees and costs
from the creditor.
4. If the debtor believes that providing the information
required by subparagraph (3) of paragraph (a) of subsection 2 is
likely to result in abuse to the debtor or an immediate family
member of the debtor, the debtor may , in lieu of providing the
information, submit to the court a statement, signed and sworn to
or affirmed by the debtor, that such disclosure is likely to result in
abuse to the debtor or an immediate family member of the debtor.
5. As used in this section:
(a) “Coerced debt” means an unsecured consumer debt or any
part thereof incurred for personal, family or household purposes
as a result of fraud, duress, intimidation, threat of force or undue
influence in the name of a debtor who is a victim of:
(1) Sex trafficking as defined in NRS 201.300; or
(2) Domestic violence, if the alleged perpetrator is a:
(I) Spouse or former spouse of the debtor;
(II) Person who has a child in common with the debtor;
(III) Person related by blood or marriage to the debtor;
(IV) Person who is living with or has lived with the
debtor; or
(V) Person who was in a dating relationship with the
debtor at the time the debt was incurred.
(b) “Unsecured consumer debt” does not include a credit
instrument, as defined in NRS 463.01467.
(c) “Victim” includes a person who alleges that he or she is a
victim of an act, regardless of whether or not the alleged
perpetrator of the act has been charged with or convicted of the
act.
Sec. 1.5. NRS 205.132 is hereby amended to read as follows:
205.132 1. In a criminal action for issuing a check or draft
against insufficient or no funds with intent to defraud, that intent
and the knowledge that the drawer has insufficient money, property
or credit with the drawee is presumed to exist if:
(a) The instrument is drawn on a purported account which does
not exist.

– 4 –

- 83rd Session (2025)
(b) Payment of the instrument is refused by the drawee when it
is presented in the usual course of business, unless within 5 days
after receiving notice of this fact from the drawee or the holder, the
drawer pays the holder of the instrument the full amount due plus
any handling charges. For the purposes of this paragraph,
presentation of a check or draft that constitutes a credit
instrument, as defined in NRS 463.01467, occurs in the usual
course of business if the presentation occurs not more than 2
years after the date on which the credit instrument is issued.
(c) Notice of refusal of payment, sent to the drawer by registered
or certified mail at an address printed or written on the instrument, is
returned because of nondelivery.
2. If a complainant causes a criminal action to be commenced
for issuing a check or draft with intent to defraud and refuses to
testify in the action, the complainant is presumed to have acted
maliciously and without probable cause.
Sec. 2. (Deleted by amendment.)
Sec. 3. 1. This section becomes effective upon passage and
approval.
2. Section 1.5 of this act becomes effective upon passage and
approval, and applies to any credit instrument, as defined in NRS
463.01467, signed by a drawer before, on or after the effective date
of section 1.5 of this act.
3. Section 1 of this act becomes effective on October 1, 2025,
and applies to any action filed on or after October 1, 2025.

20 ~~~~~ 25