Back to New Hampshire

HB1607 • 2026

relative to the use and storage of road salt.

relative to the use and storage of road salt.

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Rosemarie Rung (D), Karen Ebel (D), Will Darby (D), Brian Taylor (R), Peter Lovett (D), David Watters (D), John MacDonald (R)
Last action
2026-03-12
Official status
HOUSE
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

relative to the use and storage of road salt.

relative to the use and storage of road salt.

What This Bill Does

  • relative to the use and storage of road salt.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-12 H

    Remove from Table (Rep. Rung): MF RC 156-194 03/12/2026 HJ 8 P. 60

  2. 2026-02-12 H

    Lay HB1607 on Table (Rep. Milz): MA RC 188-166 02/12/2026 HJ 4 P. 44

  3. 2026-02-05 H

    Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment #2026-0497h 02/03/2026 (Vote 15-0; RC) HC 6 P. 16

  4. 2026-01-28 H

    Subcommittee Work Session: 02/03/2026 11:00 am GP 228

  5. 2026-01-21 H

    Subcommittee Work Session: 01/27/2026 01:00 pm GP 228

  6. 2026-01-14 H

    ==RECESSED== Executive Session: 01/13/2026 10:00 am GP 228

  7. 2026-01-08 H

    Public Hearing: 01/13/2026 10:30 am GP 228

  8. 2025-12-10 H

    Introduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Public Works and Highways HJ 1 P. 28

Official Summary Text

relative to the use and storage of road salt.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HB 1607-FN - AS INTRODUCED

2026 SESSION
26-2407
04/09

HOUSE BILL
1607-FN

AN ACT
relative to the use and storage of road salt.

SPONSORS: Rep. Rung, Hills. 12; Rep. Taylor, Carr. 8; Rep. J. MacDonald, Carr. 6; Rep. Ebel, Merr. 7; Rep. Lovett, Graf. 8; Rep. Darby, Hills. 11; Sen. Watters, Dist 4

COMMITTEE: Public Works and Highways

-----------------------------------------------------------------

ANALYSIS

This bill prohibits unsafe chemical storage, protects water sources from contamination, and empowers the department to regulate and enforce stricter safeguards in vulnerable areas.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in
bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [
in brackets and struckthrough.
]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
26-2407
04/09

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six

AN ACT
relative to the use and storage of road salt.

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 New Section; Groundwater Contamination; Storage and Management of Snow Ice Control Chemicals. Amend RSA 485-C by inserting after section 8 the following new section:
485:C-8-a Storage and Management of Snow Ice Control Chemicals.
I. No person shall store sodium chloride, calcium chloride, magnesium chloride, or salt treated abrasives or other chemicals used for snow and ice management on road parking lots and sidewalks in such a manner or place as to subject groundwater or surface water to the risk of contamination.
II. The department shall issue regulations as to the place and manner of storage and management of such chemicals. Such regulations may provide additional requirements if such chemicals are to be stored and managed over or adjacent to areas where groundwater or surface water is presently or has previously been impacted by chemicals used for snow and ice management.

2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.

LBA
26-2407
12/8/25

HB 1607-FN- FISCAL NOTE
AS INTRODUCED

AN ACT
relative to the use and storage of road salt.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This bill does not provide funding, nor does it authorize new positions.

Estimated State Impact

FY 2026
FY 2027
FY 2028
FY 2029

Revenue
$0
$0
$0
$0

Revenue Fund(s)
None

Expenditures*
$0
Indeterminable Increase
$10,000 to $100,000
Indeterminable Increase $10,000 to $100,000
Indeterminable Increase
$10,000 to $100,000

Funding Source(s)
General Fund and Various Agency Funds

Appropriations*
$0
$0
$0
$0

Funding Source(s)
None

*Expenditure = Cost of bill *Appropriation = Authorized funding to cover cost of bill

Estimated Political Subdivision Impact

FY 2026
FY 2027
FY 2028
FY 2029

County Revenue
$0
$0
$0
$0

County Expenditures
$0
Indeterminable Increase
$10,000 to $500,000
Indeterminable Increase $10,000 to $500,000
Indeterminable Increase
$10,000 to $500,000

Local Revenue
$0
$0
$0
$0

Local Expenditures
$0
Indeterminable Increase
$10,000 to $500,000
Indeterminable Increase $10,000 to $500,000
Indeterminable Increase
$10,000 to $500,000

METHODOLOGY:
This bill adds a new section to RSA 485-C prohibiting the storage of road salt and other snow and ice control chemicals in a manner that risks groundwater or surface water contamination. The bill requires the Department of Environmental Services (DES) to adopt rules governing storage and management practices and authorizes additional requirements in areas where contamination is present.

The DES states this bill will increase State expenditures by an indeterminable amount. DES states that although the development of administrative rules can be completed by existing staff, the primary cost of the bill stems from enforcing those rules once adopted. Enforcement may include reviewing self-reports, conducting inspections, and issuing administrative orders or fines. DES notes that the extent of enforcement activity cannot be estimated because there is no statewide inventory of salt storage facilities. Because the scope of enforcement is unknown, DES cannot determine whether existing staff can absorb the workload or whether an additional entry-level position would be needed. If a new position is required, DES estimates enforcement-related costs would fall within the range of $10,000 to $100,000 annually.

Additionally, DES states county and municipal expenditures may increase because local public works and highway departments that do not currently meet proper de-icing storage standards may need to upgrade or construct compliant de-icing storage structures. DES notes that storage facility costs vary significantly, with large barns potentially exceeding $500,000 and smaller pole barns costing less than $50,000. Many entities may already comply with anticipated standards, but the number of required upgrades is unknown.

The Department of Justice states the bill may increase enforcement-related workload if violations occur. DOJ anticipates only occasional enforcement actions and states that expenditures are indeterminable but could be less than $10,000 per year and absorbed within existing resources.

AGENCIES CONTACTED:
Department of Environmental Services and Department of Justice