Back to New Hampshire

HB1788 • 2026

(New Title) holding state contracts with DEI provisions to be void as a matter of law and establishing a right of action for citizens where public entities or state agencies engage with contracts with DEI provisions.

(New Title) holding state contracts with DEI provisions to be void as a matter of law and establishing a right of action for citizens where public entities or state agencies engage with contracts with DEI provisions.

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Rich Nalevanko (R), Joe Sweeney (R), Ross Berry (R), Susan DeRoy (R), Jose Cambrils (R), Ruth Ward (R), Robert Wherry (R)
Last action
2026-04-10
Official status
SENATE
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

(New Title) holding state contracts with DEI provisions to be void as a matter of law and establishing a right of action for citizens where public entities or state agencies engage with contracts with DEI provisions.

(New Title) holding state contracts with DEI provisions to be void as a matter of law and establishing a right of action for citizens where public entities or state agencies engage with contracts with DEI provisions.

What This Bill Does

  • (New Title) holding state contracts with DEI provisions to be void as a matter of law and establishing a right of action for citizens where public entities or state agencies engage with contracts with DEI provisions.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Amendment #2026-0453h : AA DV 324-1 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 170

Plain English: Amendment #2026-0453h : AA DV 324-1 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 170 1

  • The official amendment file could not be read automatically during the last sync, so only the official amendment metadata is shown right now.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-10 S

    Refer to Interim Study, MA, VV; 04/16/2026; SJ 9

  2. 2026-04-09 S

    Committee Report: Referred to Interim Study, 04/16/2026; Vote 5-0; CC; SC 14

  3. 2026-03-26 S

    Hearing: 04/02/2026, Room 100, SH, 01:40 pm; SC 12

  4. 2026-03-17 S

    Introduced 03/12/2026 and Referred to Judiciary; SJ 7

  5. 2026-03-11 H

    Amendment #2026-0453h : AA DV 324-1 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 170

  6. 2026-03-11 H

    Ought to Pass with Amendment 2026-0453h: MA DV 179-148 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 171

  7. 2026-03-04 H

    Majority Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment #2026-0453h (NT) 03/03/2026 (Vote 9-7; RC) HC 10 P. 45

  8. 2026-03-04 H

    Minority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate

  9. 2026-02-27 H

    Executive Session: 03/03/2026 01:00 pm GP 159

  10. 2026-01-08 H

    Public Hearing: 01/15/2026 10:00 am GP 231

  11. 2025-12-17 H

    Introduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Executive Departments and Administration HJ 1 P. 36

Official Summary Text

(New Title) holding state contracts with DEI provisions to be void as a matter of law and establishing a right of action for citizens where public entities or state agencies engage with contracts with DEI provisions.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HB 1788-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE

11Mar2026... 0453h
2026 SESSION
26-2401
07/09

HOUSE BILL
1788-FN

AN ACT
holding state contracts with DEI provisions to be void as a matter of law and establishing a right of action for citizens where public entities or state agencies engage with contracts with DEI provisions.

SPONSORS: Rep. Nalevanko, Ches. 9; Rep. DeRoy, Straf. 3; Rep. Wherry, Hills. 13; Rep. Sweeney, Rock. 25; Rep. Cambrils, Merr. 4; Rep. Berry, Hills. 44; Sen. Ward, Dist 8

COMMITTEE: Executive Departments and Administration

─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

AMENDED ANALYSIS

This bill:

I. Requires courts to find that contracts that include DEI-related provisions are void as a matter of law.

II. Allows citizens to sue public entities or state agencies for engaging in, or failing to investigate allegations of, contracts with DEI-related provisions.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in
bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [
in brackets and struckthrough.
]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
11Mar2026... 0453h 26-2401
07/09

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six

AN ACT
holding state contracts with DEI provisions to be void as a matter of law and establishing a right of action for citizens where public entities or state agencies engage with contracts with DEI provisions.

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 The State and Its Government; Prohibition on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion; Definitions. Amend RSA 21-I:112, II to read as follows:
II. "Diversity, equity, and inclusion" or "DEI" shall mean any program, policy, training, or initiative that classifies individuals based on a characteristic identified under RSA 354-A:1 for the purpose of achieving demographic outcomes, rather than treating individuals equally under the law.
DEI shall not include activities of registered student organizations, mental or physical health services by licensed professionals, bona fide qualifications based on sex, or any attempt to comply in good faith with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

2 The State and Its Government; Department of Administrative Services; Prohibition on DEI-Related Contract Provisions. Amend RSA 21-I:114 to read as follows:
21-I:114 Prohibition on DEI-Related Contract Provisions.

I.
No agencies or political subdivisions shall enter into or renew any contract that includes DEI-related provisions, including requirements for contractors to implement DEI programs, conduct DEI training, or comply with DEI-related reporting obligations.

II. Any contract made in violation of this subdivision shall be void as a matter of law. A court of competent jurisdiction shall order the full rescission of a contract in violation of this subdivision.
III. Any citizen shall be entitled to bring a cause of action against any public entity, state agency, or political subdivision that has violated any part of this subdivision. Any citizen that can demonstrate such public entity, state agency, or political subdivision has violated any provision of this subdivision shall be entitled to declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and reasonable attorney's fees in any action brought against such district or administrative unit.

3 Education; Prohibition on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Public Schools; Definitions. Amend RSA 186:71, I to read as follows:

I. "Diversity, equity, and inclusion" or "DEI" shall mean any program, policy, training, or initiative that classifies individuals based on a characteristic identified under RSA 354-A:1 for the purpose of achieving demographic outcomes, rather than treating individuals equally under the law.
DEI shall not include activities of registered student organizations, mental or physical health services by licensed professionals, bona fide qualifications based on sex, or any attempt to comply in good faith with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

4 New Paragraphs; Education; Prohibition on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Public Schools; Interpretation and Compliance. Amend RSA 186:77 by inserting after paragraph II the following new paragraphs:
III. A violation of this subdivision shall also be considered a violation of the educator code of conduct meriting disciplinary sanctions by the state board of education.
IV. Any contract made in violation of this subdivision shall be void as a matter of law. A court of competent jurisdiction shall order the full rescission of a contract in violation of this subdivision.
V. Citizens residing within a school district or school administrative unit shall be entitled to bring causes of action against any public school, school district, or school administrative unit that has violated any part of this subdivision. Any citizen that can demonstrate such school, school district, or school administrative unit has violated any provision of this subdivision shall be entitled to declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and reasonable attorney's fees in any action brought against such district or administrative unit.
VI. The department of education shall be required to conduct good-faith investigations of a facially credible report of violations of this subdivision by any citizen residing within the school district or school administrative unit. Any citizen that can demonstrate that the department has engaged in a sustained pattern of categorically declining to investigate credible reports of violations of this subdivision shall be empowered to bring a cause of action against the department in superior court, and shall be entitled to declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and reasonable attorney's fees, regardless of whether the citizen has brought any action against the department under paragraphs IV or V.

5 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 30 days after its passage.

LBA
26-2401
3/31/26

HB 1788-FN-
FISCAL NOTE
AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE (AMENDMENT #2026-0453h)

AN ACT
holding state contracts with DEI provisions to be void as a matter of law and establishing a right of action for citizens where public entities or state agencies engage with contracts with DEI provisions.

FISCAL IMPACT:
This bill does not provide funding.

Estimated State Impact

FY 2026
FY 2027
FY 2028
FY 2029

Revenue
$0
$0
$0
$0

Revenue Fund(s)
None

Expenditures*
$0
Indeterminable
Indeterminable
Indeterminable

Funding Source(s)
General Fund

Appropriations*
$0
$0
$0
$0

Funding Source(s)
None

*Expenditure = Cost of bill *Appropriation = Authorized funding to cover cost of bill

Estimated Political Subdivision Impact

FY 2026
FY 2027
FY 2028
FY 2029

County Revenue
$0
$0
$0
$0

County Expenditures
$0
Indeterminable
Indeterminable
Indeterminable

Local Revenue
$0
$0
$0
$0

Local Expenditures
$0
Indeterminable
Indeterminable
Indeterminable

The Office of Legislative Budget Assistant is unable to provide a complete fiscal note for this bill, as amended, as it is awaiting information from the Department of Education. The Department was originally contacted on 03/18/26 and again on 03/30/26 for a fiscal note worksheet. When completed, a revised fiscal note will be forwarded to the Clerk's Office

METHODOLOGY:
This bill requires courts to find contracts that include DEI-related provisions are void as a matter of law and allows citizens to sue public entities or state agencies for engaging in, or failing to investigate allegations of, contracts with DEI-related provisions.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) states this bill voids any existing contracts by an agency or political subdivisions that include DEI-related provisions as well as permits citizens to bring a cause of action to enforce this law. The DOJ states they are unable to determine the amount of additional work this bill would require, but estimates the fiscal impact could be between $10,000 to $100,000.

The Judicial Branch states any additional work required by this bill could be absorbed into their existing budget.

The Department of Administrative Services states the affected provisions have already been eliminated from all statewide contracts and therefore will have no impact on their budget.

The fiscal impact on county and local governments is indeterminable. To the extent an action is brought against a political subdivision expenditures at the county and local level would increase by an indeterminable amount.

AGENCIES CONTACTED:
Department of Justice, Judicial Branch, Department of Administrative Services, and Department of Education