Back to New Jersey

SCR139 • 2026

Determines that DEP's 2026-2027 Game Code rules, proposed April 6, 2026, are inconsistent with legislative intent.

Determines that DEP's 2026-2027 Game Code rules, proposed April 6, 2026, are inconsistent with legislative intent.

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Bramnick, Jon M.
Last action
2026-06-24
Official status
Withdrawn from Consideration
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Determines that DEP's 2026-2027 Game Code rules, proposed April 6, 2026, are inconsistent with legislative intent.

Determines that DEP's 2026-2027 Game Code rules, proposed April 6, 2026, are inconsistent with legislative intent.

What This Bill Does

  • Determines that DEP's 2026-2027 Game Code rules, proposed April 6, 2026, are inconsistent with legislative intent.
  • Topic: Withdrawn from the Files Fiscal note: This bill has not been certified by OLS for a fiscal note.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-06-24 New Jersey Legislature

    Withdrawn from Consideration

  2. 2026-06-22 New Jersey Legislature

    Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Environment and Energy Committee

Official Summary Text

Determines that DEP's 2026-2027 Game Code rules, proposed April 6, 2026, are inconsistent with legislative intent.
Topic:
Withdrawn from the Files
Fiscal note:
This bill has not been certified by OLS for a fiscal note.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
SCR139

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION No. 139

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

222nd LEGISLATURE

�

INTRODUCED JUNE 22, 2026

Sponsored by:

Senator� JON M. BRAMNICK

District 21 (Middlesex, Morris, Somerset and Union)

SYNOPSIS

���� Determines that DEP�s 2026-207 Game Code rules,
proposed April 6, 2026, are inconsistent with legislative intent.

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

���� As introduced.

��

A
Concurrent Resolution

concerning
legislative review of Department of Environmental Protection rules and
regulations pursuant to Article V, Section IV, paragraph 6 of the Constitution
of the State of New Jersey.

Whereas,

Pursuant to Article V, Section IV, paragraph 6 of the Constitution of the State
of New Jersey, the Legislature may review any rule or regulation adopted or
proposed by an administrative agency to determine if it is consistent with the
intent of the Legislature, and invalidate an adopted rule or regulation, or
prohibit� the adoption of a proposed rule or regulation, if it finds that the
rule or regulation is not consistent with legislative intent; and

Whereas,

Upon finding that a rule or regulation is not consistent with legislative
intent, the Legislature may transmit its findings to the Governor and the head
of the Executive Branch agency which promulgated, or plans to promulgate, the
rule or regulation; and

Whereas,

On April 6, 2026, the Department of Environmental Protection, under the
Division of Fish and Wildlife, proposed new rules relating to the Game Code
which, in relevant part, make certain changes to the rules concerning weaponry
legal for use in hunting in the State; and

Whereas,

Specifically, the proposed rule at N.J.A.C.7:25-5.1(k) states that crossbows are
required to: be 25 inches long, measured from buttstock to the end of the rail;
not be collapsable; have a minimum draw length of 14 inches; have a 16-inch minimum
bolt length, measured from the nocking point of the drawstring to the front of
the bow; and have a maximum draw weight of 200 pounds; and

Whereas,

Crossbows are currently defined in the New Jersey Game Code as �a device
capable of propelling an arrow by means of traverse limbs and a string, mounted
on a stock of at least 25 inches in length, and having a working safety�; and

Whereas,

The proposed rule incorporates changes to the power stroke of a crossbow by
setting a minimum draw length and defining draw length as the distance between
the nocking point of the drawstring to the front of the crossbow; and

Whereas,

The contemporary industry definition of the power stroke of a crossbow measures
the distance between the nocking point of the drawstring and the resting point
of the drawstring after firing and is the equivalent to the draw length of a
conventional bow; and

Whereas,

The proposed measurement for draw length runs counter to the contemporary
industry measurement of power stroke, and by implementing the proposed minimum
draw length a majority of modern crossbows would be classified as illegal or
unable to be used; and

Whereas,

The proposed rule establishes a maximum draw weight, which is defined as the
force required to fully draw the crossbow�s string and relates to a crossbow�s
ability to propel arrows at speed, for reasons of the safety of the archer and
other persons and for the more ethical taking of animals; and

Whereas,

The proposed addition of a maximum draw weight for crossbows for ethical
takings is counterintuitive as heavier draw weights lead to faster bolts, and, therefore,
safer and more ethical takings and through advancements in crossbow technology,
like cranking wenches, the risk of injury to hunters drawing heavier weights
has been minimized; and

Whereas,

Pursuant to statute, at N.J.S.13:1B-32, in adopting rules and regulations that
prescribe the manner and the means of taking the Fish and Game Council must
determine the need for such action on the basis of scientific investigation and
research; and

Whereas,

In the rule proposal for proposed rule N.J.A.C 7:25-5.1(k), the Fish and Game
Council has not provided any scientific investigation and research to support
the proposal and in fact the addition of minimum draw length and maximum draw
weight do not align with the contemporary consensus; and

Whereas,

It is therefore clear that the DEP has overstepped its authority, in a manner
inconsistent with the legislative intent behind N.J.S.13:1B-32, in proposing the
aforementioned crossbow rules and regulations, and the Legislature urges the
DEP to follow the principles of the Constitution; now, therefore,

����
Be It
Resolved
by the Senate of the State of New
Jersey (the General Assembly concurring):

���� 1.��� The Legislature declares
that the 2026-2027 Game Code rules and regulations proposed by the Department
of Environmental Protection on April 6, 2026, are inconsistent with legislative
intent.

���� 2.��� Copies of this
resolution, as filed with the Secretary of State, shall be transmitted by the
Clerk of the General Assembly or the Secretary of the Senate to the Governor
and the Commissioner of Environmental Protection.

���� 3.��� Pursuant to Article V,
Section IV, paragraph 6 of the Constitution of the State of New Jersey, the
Department of Environmental Protection shall have 30 days following transmittal
of this resolution to amend or withdraw the rules at N.J.A.C. 7:25-5.1(k), or
the Legislature may, by passage of another concurrent resolution, exercise its
authority under the Constitution to invalidate the regulations in whole or in
part.

STATEMENT

���� This concurrent resolution
embodies the finding of the Legislature that the rules and regulations proposed
by the Department of Environmental Protection on April 6, 2026, are not
consistent with the intent of the Legislature. The Department of Environmental
Protection would have 30 days from the date of transmittal of this resolution
to amend or withdraw the rules and regulations or the Legislature may, by
passage of another concurrent resolution, exercise its authority under the
Constitution to invalidate the rules and regulations in whole or in part.