Back to New York

A1422 • 2025

Requires accurate interpretation of statements made by deponents with limited English proficiency in accusatory instruments and supporting depositions

Requires accurate interpretation of statements made by deponents with limited English proficiency in accusatory instruments and supporting depositions

Active

The official status still shows this bill as active or still awaiting another formal step.

Sponsor
Catalina Cruz
Last action
2026-05-04
Official status
Passed Senate
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Requires accurate interpretation of statements made by deponents with limited English proficiency in accusatory instruments and supporting depositions

Requires accurate interpretation of statements made by deponents with limited English proficiency in accusatory instruments and supporting depositions Provides that an accusatory instrument or supporting deposition consisting of factual allegations by a deponent with limited English proficiency is not sufficient unless accompanied by a sworn statement from an interpreter affirming the accuracy of the English interpretation.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires accurate interpretation of statements made by deponents with limited English proficiency in accusatory instruments and supporting depositions Provides that an accusatory instrument or supporting deposition consisting of factual allegations by a deponent with limited English proficiency is not sufficient unless accompanied by a sworn statement from an interpreter affirming the accuracy of the English interpretation.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-04 Senate

    SUBSTITUTED FOR S4525

  2. 2026-05-04 Senate

    3RD READING CAL.614

  3. 2026-05-04 Senate

    PASSED SENATE

  4. 2026-05-04 Senate

    RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY

  5. 2026-04-28 Assembly

    PASSED ASSEMBLY

  6. 2026-04-28 Assembly

    DELIVERED TO SENATE

  7. 2026-04-28 Senate

    REFERRED TO CODES

  8. 2026-01-07 Assembly

    ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.53

  9. 2025-06-10 Assembly

    REPORTED

  10. 2025-06-10 Assembly

    RULES REPORT CAL.549

  11. 2025-06-10 Assembly

    ORDERED TO THIRD READING RULES CAL.549

  12. 2025-06-09 Assembly

    REPORTED REFERRED TO RULES

  13. 2025-01-09 Assembly

    REFERRED TO CODES

Official Summary Text

Requires accurate interpretation of statements made by deponents with limited English proficiency in accusatory instruments and supporting depositions
Provides that an accusatory instrument or supporting deposition consisting of factual allegations by a deponent with limited English proficiency is not sufficient unless accompanied by a sworn statement from an interpreter affirming the accuracy of the English interpretation.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
        ________________________________________________________________________

                                          1422

                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions

                                  I N  A S S E M B L Y

                                     January 9, 2025
                                       ___________

        Introduced by M. of A. CRUZ, DE LOS SANTOS, SIMONE, KELLES, SIMON, RAGA,
          TAYLOR,  SEAWRIGHT,  LEVENBERG,  OTIS, WALKER, DAVILA, GLICK, ZACCARO,
          ZINERMAN, ROSENTHAL, K. BROWN -- read once and referred to the Commit-
          tee on Codes

        AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law,  in  relation  to  requiring
          accurate  interpretation  of statements made by deponents with limited
          English proficiency in accusatory instruments and  supporting  deposi-
          tions

          THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
        BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

     1    Section 1. Section 100.40 of the criminal procedure law is amended  by
     2  adding a new subdivision 5 to read as follows:
     3    5.  NOTWITHSTANDING  ANY  PROVISION  OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, WHERE THE
     4  FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS OF AN ACCUSATORY INSTRUMENT  AND/OR  ANY  SUPPORTING
     5  DEPOSITION  FILED IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH INSTRUMENT CONSIST OF A STATE-
     6  MENT MADE BY A DEPONENT TO  A  PUBLIC  SERVANT  OR  OTHER  PERSON  IN  A
     7  LANGUAGE  OTHER  THAN  ENGLISH,  SUCH INSTRUMENT SHALL NOT BE SUFFICIENT
     8  UNLESS IT IS ACCOMPANIED BY:
     9    (A) (I)  A  STATEMENT  OF  THE  FACTUAL  ALLEGATIONS  WRITTEN  IN  THE
    10  DEPONENT'S  PRIMARY  LANGUAGE AND A SIGNED VERIFICATION UNDER PENALTY OF
    11  PERJURY IN THE DEPONENT'S PRIMARY  LANGUAGE;  (II)  AN  ENGLISH-LANGUAGE
    12  TRANSLATION  OF THE DEPONENT'S STATEMENT AND OF THE VERIFICATION WRITTEN
    13  BY AN INTERPRETER; AND (III) AN AFFIDAVIT BY THE INTERPRETER STATING THE
    14  INTERPRETER'S QUALIFICATIONS AND AFFIRMING THE ACCURACY OF  SUCH  TRANS-
    15  LATION; OR
    16    (B)  (I) A WRITTEN ENGLISH-LANGUAGE TRANSLATION OF THE DEPONENT'S ORAL
    17  OR WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS, DRAFTED  BY  AN  INTER-
    18  PRETER;  AND  (II)  AN  AFFIDAVIT  FROM THE INTERPRETER: (A) STATING THE
    19  INTERPRETER'S QUALIFICATIONS; (B) AFFIRMING THAT THE  INTERPRETER  ACCU-
    20  RATELY  TRANSLATED  SUCH  STATEMENT INTO ENGLISH; (C) AFFIRMING THAT THE
    21  INTERPRETER ACCURATELY COMMUNICATED THE CONTENT OF THE STATEMENT TO  THE

         EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD03852-01-5
        A. 1422                             2

     1  DEPONENT  IN  THE  DEPONENT'S  PRIMARY  LANGUAGE; (D) AFFIRMING THAT THE
     2  DEPONENT CONFIRMED THE ACCURACY OF THE ALLEGATIONS AS COMMUNICATED;  AND
     3  (E)  AFFIRMING  THAT THE INTERPRETER ACCURATELY TRANSLATED THE VERIFICA-
     4  TION STATEMENT TO THE WITNESS IN THE WITNESS'S PRIMARY LANGUAGE.
     5    §  2.  This  act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
     6  have become a law.