Back to New York

A93 • 2025

Prohibits mandatory arbitration agreements in consumer and employment contracts; repealer

Prohibits mandatory arbitration agreements in consumer and employment contracts; repealer

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Jeffrey Dinowitz
Last action
2026-05-19
Official status
In Assembly Committee
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Prohibits mandatory arbitration agreements in consumer and employment contracts; repealer

Prohibits mandatory arbitration agreements in consumer and employment contracts; repealer Prohibits mandatory arbitration agreements in consumer and employment contracts; repeals existing provisions prohibiting mandatory arbitration clauses in certain consumer contracts.

What This Bill Does

  • Prohibits mandatory arbitration agreements in consumer and employment contracts; repealer Prohibits mandatory arbitration agreements in consumer and employment contracts; repeals existing provisions prohibiting mandatory arbitration clauses in certain consumer contracts.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-19 Assembly

    AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PROTECTION

  2. 2026-05-19 Assembly

    PRINT NUMBER 93A

  3. 2026-01-07 Assembly

    REFERRED TO CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PROTECTION

  4. 2025-01-08 Assembly

    REFERRED TO CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PROTECTION

Official Summary Text

Prohibits mandatory arbitration agreements in consumer and employment contracts; repealer
Prohibits mandatory arbitration agreements in consumer and employment contracts; repeals existing provisions prohibiting mandatory arbitration clauses in certain consumer contracts.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
        ________________________________________________________________________

                                           93

                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions

                                  I N  A S S E M B L Y

                                       (PREFILED)

                                     January 8, 2025
                                       ___________

        Introduced  by  M.  of A. DINOWITZ, SEAWRIGHT, WILLIAMS, REYES -- Multi-
          Sponsored by -- M. of A. SIMON  --  read  once  and  referred  to  the
          Committee on Consumer Affairs and Protection

        AN  ACT  to  amend  the  general business law, in relation to prohibited
          mandatory arbitration agreements; and to repeal section 399-c of  such
          law  relating  to prohibiting mandatory arbitration clauses in certain
          consumer contracts

          THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
        BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

     1    Section 1. Section 399-c of the general business law is REPEALED and a
     2  new section 399-c is added to read as follows:
     3    § 399-C. PROHIBITED MANDATORY ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS.  1. DEFINITIONS.
     4  (A) THE TERM "CONSUMER DISPUTE" SHALL MEAN A DISPUTE BETWEEN AN INDIVID-
     5  UAL WHO SEEKS OR ACQUIRES REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY, SERVICES (INCLUDING
     6  SERVICES RELATING TO SECURITIES AND OTHER INVESTMENTS), MONEY, OR CREDIT
     7  FOR PERSONAL, FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES AND THE SELLER OR PROVIDER OF
     8  SUCH PROPERTY, SERVICES, MONEY OR CREDIT.
     9    (B)  THE  TERM  "EMPLOYMENT  DISPUTE"  SHALL MEAN A DISPUTE BETWEEN AN
    10  EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE ARISING OUT OF THE RELATIONSHIP  OF  EMPLOYER  AND
    11  EMPLOYEE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 3 OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938
    12  (29 U.S.C. 203).
    13    (C)  THE  TERM "MANDATORY ARBITRATION AGREEMENT" SHALL MEAN ANY AGREE-
    14  MENT TO ARBITRATE A DISPUTE THAT HAD NOT YET ARISEN AT THE TIME  OF  THE
    15  MAKING OF THE AGREEMENT.
    16    2.  PROHIBITED  MANDATORY  CONSUMER  AND EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION AGREE-
    17  MENTS.  NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE, NO MANDATO-
    18  RY ARBITRATION AGREEMENT SHALL BE VALID OR ENFORCEABLE  IF  IT  REQUIRES
    19  ARBITRATION OF AN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTE OR CONSUMER DISPUTE.
    20    3.   PROHIBITION OF EFFECT OF CERTAIN MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSES OR
    21  AGREEMENTS.    MANDATORY  ARBITRATION  CLAUSES  OR  AGREEMENTS  COVERING

         EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD00889-01-5
        A. 93                               2

     1  CONSUMERS  AND  EMPLOYEE DISPUTES ARE CONTRARY TO THE ESTABLISHED PUBLIC
     2  POLICY OF THIS STATE. BECAUSE EMPLOYEES AND CONSUMERS  ARE  REQUIRED  TO
     3  ASSENT  TO  THESE  AGREEMENTS  AS  A  CONDITION  OF BEING AN EMPLOYEE OR
     4  CONSUMER  BEFORE  ANY  DISPUTE HAS ARISEN WITH THE EMPLOYER OR MERCHANT,
     5  THESE AGREEMENTS DO NOT  OFFER  EMPLOYEES  AND  CONSUMERS  A  MEANINGFUL
     6  CHOICE  ABOUT  HOW  TO  RESOLVE  THEIR  DISPUTES  WITH  THE  EMPLOYER OR
     7  MERCHANT. IN ADDITION, MANDATORY ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS PREVENT  EMPLOY-
     8  EES  AND CONSUMERS FROM EFFECTIVELY VINDICATING THEIR RIGHTS UNDER STATE
     9  LAW. FOR THESE REASONS, EXCEPT WHEN INCONSISTENT WITH FEDERAL  LAW,  THE
    10  STATE  PROHIBITS  THE FORMATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF MANDATORY ARBITRATION
    11  AGREEMENTS IN EMPLOYMENT AND CONSUMER CONTRACTS.
    12    4. PROHIBITION OF MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSES  IN  INSURANCE  AGREE-
    13  MENTS.   A MANDATORY ARBITRATION AGREEMENT WITHIN OR PART OF ANY WRITTEN
    14  CONTRACT FOR INSURANCE  WITH  A  CONSUMER  OR  OTHER  WRITTEN  AGREEMENT
    15  INVOLVING THE OFFERING OF INSURANCE TO A CONSUMER IS INVALID, UNENFORCE-
    16  ABLE AND VOID. ANY SUCH ARBITRATION AGREEMENT SHALL BE CONSIDERED SEVER-
    17  ABLE,  AND  ALL  OTHER  PROVISIONS  OF  THE CONTRACT FOR INSURANCE SHALL
    18  REMAIN IN EFFECT AND GIVEN FULL FORCE.
    19    5.  PROHIBITION  OF  MANDATORY  ARBITRATION  CLAUSES   IN   EMPLOYMENT
    20  CONTRACTS  FOR WORKERS EXEMPTED FROM THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT.  (A) A
    21  MANDATORY ARBITRATION AGREEMENT WITHIN OR PART OF ANY  WRITTEN  CONTRACT
    22  OF  EMPLOYMENT  OF  MARINERS,  RAILROAD  EMPLOYEES OR ANY OTHER CLASS OF
    23  WORKERS ENGAGED IN FOREIGN OR INTERSTATE COMMERCE IS  UNENFORCEABLE  AND
    24  VOID.  ANY SUCH ARBITRATION AGREEMENT SHALL BE CONSIDERED SEVERABLE, AND
    25  ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT SHALL REMAIN  IN  EFFECT
    26  AND GIVEN FULL FORCE.
    27    (B) THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO AGREEMENTS NEGO-
    28  TIATED WITH ANY LABOR UNION THROUGH COLLECTIVE BARGAINING.
    29    6.  PROHIBITION OF MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSES THAT ARE NOT GOVERNED
    30  BY FEDERAL LAW.  ANY MANDATORY ARBITRATION AGREEMENT, OR PORTION  THERE-
    31  OF,  IN AN EMPLOYMENT OR CONSUMER CONTRACT IS INVALID, UNENFORCEABLE AND
    32  VOID, WHEN THE ENFORCEABILITY OF  SUCH  ARBITRATION  AGREEMENT,  OR  THE
    33  PORTION  AT ISSUE, IS GOVERNED BY STATE LAW. ANY SUCH ARBITRATION AGREE-
    34  MENT SHALL BE CONSIDERED SEVERABLE, AND  ALL  OTHER  PROVISIONS  OF  THE
    35  EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT SHALL REMAIN IN EFFECT AND GIVEN FULL FORCE.
    36    § 2. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after
    37  it shall have become a law.