Back to Ohio

SB342 • 2026

Prohibit certain clauses from conservancy district contracts

Prohibit certain clauses from conservancy district contracts

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Al Landis
Last action
Official status
As Passed by the Senate
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Prohibit certain clauses from conservancy district contracts

To enact section 6101.162 of the Revised Code to prohibit a conservancy district's board of directors from including certain provisions, such as an indemnification clause, in a contract for the procurement of goods or services.

What This Bill Does

  • To enact section 6101.162 of the Revised Code to prohibit a conservancy district's board of directors from including certain provisions, such as an indemnification clause, in a contract for the procurement of goods or services.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. Ohio Legislature

    As Introduced

  2. Ohio Legislature

    As Reported by the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee

  3. Ohio Legislature

    As Passed by the Senate

Official Summary Text

To enact section 6101.162 of the Revised Code to prohibit a conservancy district's board of directors from including certain provisions, such as an indemnification clause, in a contract for the procurement of goods or services.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
sb342_02_PS

As Passed by the Senate

136th
General Assembly

Regular
Session
S. B. No. 342

2025-2026

Senators Landis, Chavez

Cosponsors: Senators Schaffer,
Antonio, Cirino, Craig, Reineke

To
enact section 6101.162 of the Revised Code
to
prohibit a conservancy district's board of directors from including
certain provisions, such as an indemnification clause, in a contract
for the procurement of goods or services.

BE
IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF OHIO:

Section
1.
That
section 6101.162 of the Revised Code be enacted to read as follows:

Sec.
6101.162.
(A)
Except as otherwise required or permitted by state or federal law, a
contract entered into by a conservancy district for the procurement
of goods or services shall not include any of the following:

(1)
A provision that requires the conservancy district to indemnify or
hold harmless another person;

(2)
A provision that names a venue for any action or dispute against the
conservancy district other than a court of proper jurisdiction in the
state;

(3)
A provision that requires the conservancy district to agree to limit
the liability for any direct loss to the district for bodily injury,
death, or damage to property of the district caused by the
negligence, intentional or willful misconduct, fraudulent act,
recklessness, or other tortious conduct of a person or a person's
employees or agents, or a provision that otherwise imposes an
indemnification obligation on the district;

(4)
A provision that requires the conservancy district to be bound by a
term or condition that is unknown to the district at the time of
signing a contract, that is not specifically negotiated with the
district, that may be unilaterally changed by the other party, or
that is electronically accepted by a district employee;

(5)
A provision that is inconsistent with the conservancy district's
obligations under section 149.43 of the Revised Code;

(6)
A provision that limits the conservancy district's ability to recover
the cost for a replacement contractor.

(B)
If a contract contains a term or condition described in division (A)
of this section, the term or condition is void ab initio. The
contract containing that term or condition otherwise is enforceable
as if it did not contain such term or condition.