Back to Rhode Island

S2770 • 2026

AN ACT RELATING TO INSURANCE -- UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES ACT (Characterizes the failure of a homeowner's insurance policy to use matching principle in its interpretation of replacement cost coverage in its homeowner's insurance policy, as an unfair claim settlement practices.)

AN ACT RELATING TO INSURANCE -- UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES ACT (Characterizes the failure of a homeowner's insurance policy to use matching principle in its interpretation of replacement cost coverage in its homeowner's insurance policy, as an unfair claim settlement practices.)

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Pearson, Quezada, Gallo, Tikoian, Lauria, Kallman, Euer, Zurier
Last action
2026-03-31
Official status
Committee recommended measure be held for further study
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The plain English breakdown is still being put together. The official documents below are already here.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-31 Committee

    Committee recommended measure be held for further study

  2. 2026-03-27 Rhode Island General Assembly

    Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (03/31/2026)

  3. 2026-03-04 Rhode Island General Assembly

    Introduced, referred to Senate Commerce

Official Summary Text

AN ACT RELATING TO INSURANCE -- UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES ACT (Characterizes the failure of a homeowner's insurance policy to use matching principle in its interpretation of replacement cost coverage in its homeowner's insurance policy, as an unfair claim settlement practices.)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
S2770

2026 -- S 2770
========
LC004482
========

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY
JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2026
____________
A N A C T
RELATING TO INSURANCE -- UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES ACT

Introduced By:
Senators Pearson, Quezada, Gallo, Tikoian, Lauria, Kallman, Euer, and
Zurier

Date Introduced:
March 04, 2026

Referred To:
Senate Commerce
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows:
1
SECTION 1. Section 27-9.1-4 of the General Laws in Chapter 27-9.1 entitled "Unfair
2
Claims Settlement Practices Act" is hereby amended to read as follows:
3

27-9.1-4. “Unfair claims practices” defined.
4
(a) Any of the following acts by an insurer, if committed in violation of § 27-9.1-3,
5
constitutes an unfair claims practice:
6
(1) Misrepresenting to claimants and insured relevant facts or policy provisions relating to
7
coverage at issue;
8
(2) Failing to acknowledge and act with reasonable promptness upon pertinent
9
communications with respect to claims arising under its policies;
10
(3) Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation and
11
settlement of claims arising under its policies;
12
(4) Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlement of
13
claims submitted in which liability has become reasonably clear;
14
(5) Compelling insured, beneficiaries, or claimants to institute suits to recover amounts due
15
under its policies by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered in suits
16
brought by them;
17
(6) Refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation;
18
(7) Failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after having
19
completed its investigation related to the claim or claims;

1
(8) Attempting to settle or settling claims for less than the amount that a reasonable person
2
would believe the insured or beneficiary was entitled by reference to written or printed advertising
3
material accompanying or made part of an application;
4
(9) Attempting to settle or settling claims on the basis of an application that was materially
5
altered without notice to, or knowledge or consent of, the insured;
6
(10) Making claims payments to an insured or beneficiary without indicating the coverage
7
under which each payment is being made;
8
(11) Unreasonably delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring both a
9
formal proof of loss form and subsequent verification that would result in duplication of
10
information and verification appearing in the formal proof of loss form;
11
(12) Failing in the case of claims denials or offers of compromise settlement to promptly
12
provide a reasonable and accurate explanation of the basis of those actions;
13
(13) Failing to provide forms necessary to present claims within ten (10) calendar days of
14
a request with reasonable explanations regarding their use;
15
(14) Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards to assure that the repairs of a
16
repairer owned by or required to be used by the insurer are performed in a workmanlike manner;
17
(15) Misleading a claimant as to the applicable statute of limitations;
18
(16) Failing to respond to a claim within thirty (30) days, unless the insured shall agree to
19
a longer period;
20
(17) Engaging in any act or practice of intimidation, coercion, threat, or misrepresentation
21
of consumers rights, for or against any insured person, claimant, or entity to use a particular rental
22
car company for motor vehicle replacement services or products; provided, however, nothing shall
23
prohibit any insurance company, agent, or adjuster from providing to such insured person, claimant,
24
or entity the names of a rental car company with which arrangements have been made with respect
25
to motor vehicle replacement services; provided, that the rental car company is licensed pursuant
26
to § 31-5-33;
27
(18) Refusing to honor a “direction to pay” executed by:
28
(i) An insured, claimant, indicating that the insured or claimant wishes to have the
29
insurance company directly pay the insured’s or claimant’s motor vehicle replacement vehicle
30
rental benefit to the rental car company of the consumer’s choice; provided, that the rental car
31
company is licensed pursuant to § 31-5-33. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent
32
the insurance company’s ability to question or challenge the amount charged, in accordance with
33
its policy provisions, and the requirements of the department of business regulation; provided that,
34
the insurance company promptly notifies the rental car company in writing of the reason. The

LC004482 - Page 2 of 8
1
written notification shall be made at or before the time that the insurance company submits payment
2
to the rental car company;
3
(ii) An insured or claimant, indicating that the insured or claimant wishes to have the
4
insurance company directly pay the insured’s or claimant’s motor vehicle repair benefit, as a single
5
party payment exclusively to the auto body shop of the consumer’s choice; provided that, the auto
6
body shop is licensed pursuant to § 5-38-4;
7
(19) Refusing to honor a “direction to pay” executed by an insured, claimant, indicating
8
that the insured or claimant wishes to have the insurance company directly pay the insured’s
9
property damage benefit to the restoration company of the consumer’s choice; provided, however,
10
that the amount of the claim to be paid directly to the restoration company shall be no greater than
11
five thousand dollars ($5,000), and that the restoration company is licensed pursuant to § 5-65-3.
12
Nothing in this section shall be construed to:
13
(i) Prevent the insurance company’s ability to question or challenge whether the services
14
billed for are covered by the policy, related to an occurrence covered by the policy, or the amount
15
charged, in accordance with its policy provisions, and the requirements of the department of
16
business regulation; or
17
(ii) Adversely affect the right of any mortgagee or other person with an interest in the policy
18
unless such mortgagee or other person has also executed the “direction to pay”;
19
(20) Modifying any published manual, i.e., Motor’s Auto Repair Manual, Mitchells, or any
20
automated appraisal system, relating to auto body repair without prior agreement between the
21
parties;
22
(21) Failing to use a manual or system in its entirety in the appraisal of a motor vehicle;
23
(22) Refusing to compensate an auto body shop for its documented charges as identified,
24
and based on, the most current version of automotive industry-recognized software programs or
25
systems for paint, body, and refinishing materials, utilized in auto body repair, including, but not
26
limited to, programs such as Mitchell’s RMC, PMC Logic, Paint, Micromix, or other paint
27
manufacturer’s programs. An insurer shall not discount documented charges by failing to use a
28
system in its entirety, including an automotive industry standard markup;
29
(23) Refusing to acknowledge and compensate an auto body repairer for documented
30
procedures identified as required or recommended by the original equipment manufacturer,
31
manufacturer’s program, or collision repair industry recognized programs such as Alldata,
32
Repairlogic, CCC Repair Methods, I-Car or paint manufacturer, upon the initial request from the
33
auto body shop, such as, but not limited to, post collision procedures and components that should
34
not be reused or reinstalled, when included in the repairer’s appraisal, or when requested by the

LC004482 - Page 3 of 8
1
repairer (i.e., components that cannot be reused/reinstalled: requiring clips, retainers, hardware, and
2
materials);
3
(24) Failing to comply with the requirements of § 31-47-12.1;
4
(25) Failure to have an appraisal performed by a licensed appraiser where the motor vehicle
5
has sustained damage estimated to exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500). The licensed
6
appraiser referred to herein must be unaffiliated with the repair facility repairing the subject motor
7
vehicle; must perform a physical inspection of the damaged motor vehicle; and may not perform
8
an appraisal based upon pictures of the damaged motor vehicle;
9
(26) Failure of an insurer’s assigned appraiser, or representative, to promptly schedule an
10
appointment for an appraisal of a damaged vehicle with the auto body repair shop, at an agreed
11
upon date and time, between normal business hours;
12
(27) Failure to perform an appraisal within three (3) business days after a request is
13
received from an auto body repair shop, provided the damaged motor vehicle is on the premises of
14
the repair shop when the request is made, and failure to perform a supplemental appraisal inspection
15
of a vehicle within four (4) business days after a request is received from an auto body repair shop.
16
If the insurer’s appraiser fails to inspect the damaged motor vehicle within the allotted number of
17
business days for an appraisal or a supplemental appraisal, the insurer shall forfeit its right to inspect
18
the damaged vehicle prior to repairs, and negotiations shall be limited to labor and the price of parts
19
and shall not, unless objective evidence to the contrary is provided by the insurer, involve disputes
20
as to the existence of damage or the chosen manner of repair. The time limitations set forth in this
21
subsection may be extended by mutual agreement between the auto body repair shop and the
22
insurer;
23
(28) Refusing to extend the rental vehicle coverage requirements of an insured or claimant
24
proportionally to claim delays caused by the insurer;
25
(29) Designating a motor vehicle a total loss if the cost to rebuild or reconstruct the motor
26
vehicle to its pre-accident condition is less than seventy-five percent (75%) to eighty percent (80%)
27
of the “fair market value” of the motor vehicle immediately preceding the time it was damaged.
28
The consumer may designate the motor vehicle a total loss when the seventy-five percent (75%)
29
threshold is met but less than eighty percent (80%) of the fair market value of the motor vehicle:
30
(i) For the purposes of this subdivision, “fair market value” means the retail value of a
31
motor vehicle as set forth in a current edition of a nationally recognized compilation of retail values
32
commonly used by the automotive industry to establish values of motor vehicles;
33
(ii) Nothing herein shall be construed to require a vehicle be deemed a total loss if the total
34
cost to rebuild or reconstruct the motor vehicle to its pre-accident condition is greater than eighty

LC004482 - Page 4 of 8
1
percent (80%) of the fair market value of the motor vehicle immediately preceding the time it was
2
damaged;
3
(iii) Nothing herein shall prohibit an insurance company from agreeing to deem a vehicle
4
a total loss at the vehicle owner’s request and with the vehicle owner’s express written authorization
5
if the cost to rebuild or reconstruct the motor vehicle to its pre-accident condition is less than eighty
6
percent (80%) of the “fair market value” of the motor vehicle immediately preceding the time it
7
was damaged;
8
(iv) If condition adjustments are made to the retail value of a motor vehicle designated a
9
total loss, all such adjustments must be in accordance with the standards set forth in the current
10
edition of a nationally recognized compilation of retail values, commonly used by the automotive
11
industry, used by the insurer to determine the retail value of the vehicle; and all such adjustments,
12
including prior damage deductions, must be itemized, fair, and reasonable; and
13
(v) When a vehicle is deemed a total loss, if the insurer is not retaining the salvage, the
14
insurer must notify the owner of the vehicle in writing of the requirements of obtaining both a
15
salvage title and a reconstructed title from the department of motor vehicles pursuant to chapter 1
16
of title 31, and must obtain, in writing, the owner’s consent and acknowledgement that the insurer
17
is not retaining the salvage and include a statement of the owner’s obligation and potential costs to
18
dispose of or otherwise retain the salvage;
19
(30) Negotiating, or effecting the settlement of, a claim for loss or damage covered by an
20
insurance contract with an unlicensed public adjuster acting on behalf of an insured. Nothing
21
contained in this section shall be construed to preclude an insurer from dealing with any individual
22
or entity that is not required to be licensed under chapter 10 of this title;
23
(31) Refusing to pay an auto body repair shop for documented necessary sublet services
24
paid out to vendors or incurred by the auto body repair shop, for specialty or unique services
25
performed in the overall repair process, including costs and labor incurred to research, coordinate,
26
administrate, or facilitate the necessary sublet service, and an automotive industry standard markup.
27
Examples of sublet services include, but are not limited to, towing, transportation, suspension,
28
alignments, electronic calibrations, diagnostic work, mechanical work, and paid charges to release
29
a vehicle;
30
(32) Failure of any domestic, foreign, or alien insurers to comply with the requirements of
31
this section; when settling claims on Rhode Island registered vehicles repaired in Rhode Island,
32
regardless of the state where the insurance policy was issued or originates;
33
(33)(i) When a claim is settled, or partially settled, where the named insured is represented
34
by a public adjuster licensed pursuant to § 27-10-5, failing to obey a direction to pay letter directing

LC004482 - Page 5 of 8
1
the insurer to issue a check or checks payable to the public adjuster for the public adjuster’s fee,
2
but not more than ten percent (10%) of the total amount of the settlement, and a separate check
3
payable to the named insured or any loss payee or mortgagee, or both, whichever is appropriate,
4
for the balance; provided that, the direction to pay letter is signed or electronically signed and dated
5
or electronically dated by the named insured and contains the following information:
6
(A) Name of insured(s);
7
(B) The claim number (if obtained);
8
(C) The date or approximate date of the loss;
9
(D) The public adjuster’s name;
10
(E) The name of the insurer;
11
(F) The public adjuster’s fee; and
12
(G) The addresses to which each check shall be sent.
13
(ii) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to:
14
(A) Prevent the insurance company’s ability to question or challenge whether the services
15
billed for are covered by the policy, related to an occurrence covered by the policy, or the amount
16
charged, in accordance with its policy provisions, and the requirements of the department of
17
business regulation; or
18
(B) Adversely affect the right of any mortgagee or other person with an interest in the
19
policy unless such mortgagee or other person has also executed the “direction to pay”.
20

(34) Failure of an insurer to apply the matching principle to the interpretation of its
21
homeowner's insurance policy's replacement cost coverage provisions which would have resulted
22
in the advancement of a reasonably uniform appearance of the insured's property. It would require
23
the replacement of items when replaced items do not match in quality, color or size. The matching
24
principle shall be utilized for interior and exterior losses. The insured shall not bear any cost over
25
the applicable deductible, if any.
26
(b)(1) Nothing contained in subsections (a)(20), (a)(21), and (a)(22) of this section shall be
27
construed to interfere with an auto body repair facility’s contract with an insurance company.
28
(2) If an insurance company and auto body repair facility have contracted under a direct
29
repair program or any similar program thereto, the provisions of subsections (a)(20), (a)(21), and
30
(a)(22) of this section shall not apply.
31
(3) If the insured or claimant elects to have the vehicle repaired at a shop of the insured’s
32
or claimant’s choice, the insurer shall not limit or discount the reasonable repair costs based upon
33
the charges that would have been incurred had the vehicle been repaired by the insurer’s chosen
34
shop(s).

LC004482 - Page 6 of 8
1
SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.
========
LC004482
========

LC004482 - Page 7 of 8
EXPLANATION
BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
OF
A N A C T
RELATING TO INSURANCE -- UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES ACT
***
1
This act would characterize the failure of a homeowner's insurance policy to use matching
2
principle in its interpretation of replacement cost coverage in its homeowner's insurance policy, as
3
an unfair claim settlement practice. The result would be matching the damaged part of the property
4
to the undamaged part to restore the property to its condition, prior to the loss, resulting in a uniform
5
appearance.
6
This act would take effect upon passage.
========
LC004482
========

LC004482 - Page 8 of 8