Plain English Breakdown
The exact financial impact and reduction in forfeited assets are uncertain as stated by the official digest.
Changing Proof Requirements for Asset Forfeiture
This bill changes the burden of proof required by the state in civil asset forfeiture cases from 'preponderance of evidence' to 'clear and convincing evidence'.
What This Bill Does
- Changes the amount of evidence needed by the state from 'preponderance of evidence' to 'clear and convincing evidence'.
- Applies this new standard for both initial seizures and judicial reviews of forfeiture decisions.
Who It Names or Affects
- People whose property might be seized in asset forfeiture cases.
- Law enforcement agencies involved in seizing assets.
- Courts reviewing forfeiture decisions.
Terms To Know
- preponderance of evidence
- The standard where the evidence shows that it is more likely than not that something happened or is true.
- clear and convincing evidence
- A higher standard of proof, showing with a high degree of probability that something happened or is true.
Limits and Unknowns
- The bill does not specify the exact financial impact on law enforcement agencies.
- It's unclear how many fewer assets will be forfeited as a result of this change.