Back to Virginia

HB1215 • 2026

Admission of evidence; evidentiary hearing, excluded persons.

<p class=ldtitle>A BILL to amend and reenact § 18.2-67.7 of the Code of Virginia, relating to admission of evidence; evidentiary hearing; excluded persons.</p>

Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Oates
Last action
2026-02-18
Official status
Failed
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill's official text does not provide specific details about how judges will decide which support persons can stay in the courtroom.

Rules for Evidence and Support People in Court

This bill changes rules to allow up to two support people to stay with a victim during certain court hearings, provided the judge deems it appropriate.

What This Bill Does

  • Changes the law to permit up to two support persons to remain present during evidentiary hearings if their presence is deemed supportive and will not affect the fairness of the hearing or influence the testimony.
  • Requires judges to warn these support persons against influencing or communicating with the victim in any way.
  • Gives judges discretion to remove a support person from the courtroom if they believe that person is prompting, communicating with, or influencing the victim.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Victims and accused persons involved in certain criminal cases.
  • Judges who oversee these hearings.
  • Support people for victims, like family members or friends.

Terms To Know

Evidentiary hearing
A special court meeting where a judge decides if certain evidence can be used in the trial.
Support person
Someone who provides emotional support to a victim during legal proceedings.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify what happens if more than two support people want to attend.
  • It is unclear how judges will decide which support persons can stay in the courtroom.

Bill History

  1. 2026-02-18 House

    Left in Committee Courts of Justice

  2. 2026-02-18 House

    Left in Committee Education

  3. 2026-02-06 Criminal

    Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (10-Y 0-N)

  4. 2026-02-06 Criminal

    Reconsidered by Courts of Justice (Voice Vote)

  5. 2026-02-06 Criminal

    Subcommittee recommends striking from the docket (10-Y 0-N)

  6. 2026-02-05 Criminal

    Assigned HCJ sub: Criminal

  7. 2026-01-14 House

    Prefiled and ordered printed; Offered 01-14-2026 26103645D

  8. 2026-01-14 Courts of Justice

    Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice

Official Summary Text

Admission of evidence; evidentiary hearing; excluded persons.
Exempts no more than two persons whose presence, in the judgment of the court, would be supportive of the complaining witness and would not impair the conduct of a fair hearing or pose a substantial risk of influencing or affecting the content of the testimony from being excluded from evidentiary hearings for certain prosecutions. The bill provides that if such support persons are exempted, the judge shall admonish such support persons to not prompt, communicate with, or influence the complaining witness in any way. Lastly, the bill provides that a court may exercise its discretion to remove a support person from the courtroom if it believes such support person is prompting, communicating with, or influencing the complaining witness.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
A BILL to amend and reenact §
18.2-67.7
of the Code of Virginia, relating to admission of evidence; evidentiary hearing; excluded persons.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:

1. That §
18.2-67.7
of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:

§
18.2-67.7
. Admission of evidence (Supreme Court Rule 2:412 derived from this section).

A. In prosecutions under this article, or under clause (iii) or (iv) of §
18.2-48
,
18.2-370
,
18.2-370.01
, or
18.2-370.1
, general reputation or opinion evidence of the complaining witness's unchaste character or prior sexual conduct shall not be admitted. Unless the complaining witness voluntarily agrees otherwise, evidence of specific instances of his or her prior sexual conduct shall be admitted only if it is relevant and is:

1. Evidence offered to provide an alternative explanation for physical evidence of the offense charged which is introduced by the prosecution, limited to evidence designed to explain the presence of semen, pregnancy, disease, or physical injury to the complaining witness's intimate parts; or

2. Evidence of sexual conduct between the complaining witness and the accused offered to support a contention that the alleged offense was not accomplished by force, threat or intimidation or through the use of the complaining witness's mental incapacity or physical helplessness, provided that the sexual conduct occurred within a period of time reasonably proximate to the offense charged under the circumstances of this case; or

3. Evidence offered to rebut evidence of the complaining witness's prior sexual conduct introduced by the prosecution.

B. Nothing contained in this section shall prohibit the accused from presenting evidence relevant to show that the complaining witness had a motive to fabricate the charge against the accused. If such evidence relates to the past sexual conduct of the complaining witness with a person other than the accused, it shall not be admitted and may not be referred to at any preliminary hearing or trial unless the party offering same files a written notice generally describing the evidence prior to the introduction of any evidence, or the opening statement of either counsel, whichever first occurs, at the preliminary hearing or trial at which the admission of the evidence may be sought.

C. Evidence described in subsections A and B
of this section
shall not be admitted and may not be referred to at any preliminary hearing or trial until the court first determines the admissibility of that evidence at an evidentiary hearing to be held before the evidence is introduced at such preliminary hearing or trial. The court shall exclude from the evidentiary hearing all persons except the accused, the complaining witness, other necessary witnesses,
and
required court personnel
, and no more than two persons who
se
presen
ce, in the judgment of the court, would be supportive of the complaining witness and would not impair the conduct of a fair hearing or pose a substantial risk of influencing or affecting the content of the testimony. In such ca
se, the judge shall admonish such support persons to not prompt, communicate with, or influence the complaining witness in any way. A court shall not be precluded from exercising its discretion to remove a support person from the courtroom if it believes such support person
is prompting, communicating with, or influencing the complaining witness
. If the court determines that the evidence meets the requirements of subsections A and B
of this section
, it shall be admissible before the judge or jury trying the case in the ordinary course of the preliminary hearing or trial. If the court initially determines that the evidence is inadmissible, but new information is discovered during the course of the preliminary hearing or trial
which
that
may make such evidence admissible, the court shall determine in an evidentiary hearing whether such evidence is admissible.