Back to Virginia

HB1413 • 2026

Limitation on sentence upon revocation of suspension of sentence; technical violations.

<p class=ldtitle>A BILL to amend and reenact §§ 19.2-265.6 and 19.2-306.1 of the Code of Virginia, relating to limitation on sentence<span class="MsoCommentReference"> </span>upon<span class="MsoCommentReference" > </span>revocation of suspension of sentence; technical violations.</p>

Children
Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Schmidt
Last action
2026-03-09
Official status
Continued
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source material does not provide specific details on the addition of new types of actions that count as technical violations or how individuals can defend themselves based on substantial compliance with probation obligations.

Limiting Punishment for Technical Violations

This law changes how courts handle technical violations during probation by limiting punishments and setting time limits for hearings.

What This Bill Does

  • The court must treat multiple technical violations that occur after a previous hearing as one violation, not separate cases.
  • If someone is taken into custody for a technical violation, the case must be heard within 14 days or the person can be released on bail unless they agree to stay in custody or there's proof of significant risk due to substance use disorder or mental illness.
  • The law sets a maximum detention period of 30 days if someone is held awaiting judgment for a technical violation.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People on probation who violate the terms of their probation
  • Courts handling cases involving probation violations

Terms To Know

Technical violation
A minor breach of probation rules, like missing a meeting with a probation officer.
Substance use disorder
An illness where someone has trouble controlling their drug or alcohol use.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify what happens if the court finds that the person's detention is necessary beyond 30 days.
  • It doesn't explain how courts will determine significant risk based on substance use disorder or mental illness.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

HB1413ASC1

2026-03-09 • Committee

Courts of Justice Amendment

Plain English: The amendment changes a part of Virginia law about what happens when someone on probation breaks rules.

  • Adds new language requiring courts to find that a probationer has willfully failed to appear before taking certain actions.
  • The exact impact and specific details of the change are not fully explained in the provided amendment text.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-09 Courts of Justice

    Continued to 2027 in Courts of Justice (12-Y 3-N)

  2. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Senate committee offered

  3. 2026-02-24 Courts of Justice

    Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB1413)

  4. 2026-02-18 Senate

    Constitutional reading dispensed (on 1st reading)

  5. 2026-02-18 Courts of Justice

    Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice

  6. 2026-02-17 House

    Read third time and passed House (62-Y 35-N 0-A)

  7. 2026-02-16 House

    Read second time

  8. 2026-02-16 House

    committee substitute agreed to

  9. 2026-02-16 House

    Engrossed by House - committee substitute

  10. 2026-02-15 House

    Read first time

  11. 2026-02-13 Courts of Justice

    Committee substitute printed 26107431D-H1

  12. 2026-02-13 Courts of Justice

    Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (15-Y 6-N)

  13. 2026-02-11 Criminal

    Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (7-Y 3-N)

  14. 2026-02-11 Criminal

    House subcommittee offered

  15. 2026-02-07 Criminal

    Assigned HCJ sub: Criminal

  16. 2026-02-04 House

    Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB1413)

  17. 2026-01-22 House

    Presented and ordered printed 26103278D

  18. 2026-01-22 Courts of Justice

    Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice

Official Summary Text

Limitation on sentence upon revocation of suspension of sentence; technical violations.
Provides that the court shall consider all technical violations that are alleged to have occurred after a prior sentencing or revocation hearing as single technical violation and adjudicate the case as such, with punishment imposed pursuant to relevant law. The bill also prohibits the court from treating multiple technical violations during a single probationary period between such prior sentencing or revocation hearing as separate cases or adjudicate such violations at separate hearings. The bill requires that when a defendant has been taken into custody for an alleged violation for which the court may impose not more than 14 days of active incarceration, the court shall docket such case as soon as practicable, and any such case shall be given precedence on the docket. The bill states that if such violation is not adjudicated within 14 days of the defendant being taken into custody, the defendant shall be admitted to bail, unless (i) such defendant consents to being further detained while awaiting adjudication or sentencing or (ii) the Commonwealth has established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant presents a significant risk of harm to himself or the community based on substance use disorder or serious mental illness and has been referred for residential treatment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the bill provides that no such defendant shall be held in custody awaiting adjudication of or sentencing on such alleged technical violation for longer than 30 days. The bill also expands the list of technical violations and provides that it shall be a defense to an alleged violation if the defendant can show that he has substantially complied with his probation obligations.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HB 1413

COURTS OF JUSTICE

1. Line 43, engrossed, after
any

strike

the remainder of line 43 and through
(b)
on line 44

COURTS OF JUSTICE

2. Line 44, engrossed, after
court

insert

, unless the court finds that the probationer has willfully failed to appear