Back to Virginia

HB1514 • 2026

Employment decisions; automated decision systems, civil penalty.

<p class=ldtitle>A BILL to amend the Code of Virginia by adding sections numbered 2.2-1202.2 and 15.2-1500.2 and by adding in Article 1 of Chapter 3 of Title 40.1 a section numbered 40.1-28.7:12, relating to employment decisions; automated decision systems; civil penalty.</p>

Labor
Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Tran
Last action
2026-02-18
Official status
Failed
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary and digest do not provide specific details on enforcement mechanisms or penalties.

Rules for Using Automated Systems in Employment Decisions

This bill sets rules for state agencies and local government employers to follow when using automated systems as a substantial factor in employment decisions, including requiring human involvement in final decisions.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires the Director of Human Resource Management to ensure that any state agency using an automated system as a substantial factor in employment decisions complies with federal and state laws.
  • Makes agencies disclose how they use these systems, what data is used, and if personal information will be shared with others.
  • Allows people to opt out of having the system used for their job applications or promotions.
  • Requires annual testing of automated systems to check for unfair treatment based on protected characteristics like race or gender.
  • Trains agency staff on how to use these systems without causing discrimination.

Who It Names or Affects

  • State agencies and local government employers who use automated decision-making tools in employment processes.
  • Job applicants and employees whose hiring, promotion, discipline, or termination decisions may be influenced by such systems.

Terms To Know

Automated Decision System
A computational process used to make or assist in making decisions related to employment.
Algorithmic Discrimination
The use of an artificial intelligence system that results in unlawful differential treatment based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, disability, etc.

Limits and Unknowns

  • It is unclear how this will be enforced and what resources will be provided to agencies to comply with the new requirements.
  • The bill does not specify the exact penalties for employers who do not follow these rules.

Bill History

  1. 2026-02-18 House

    Left in Committee Appropriations

  2. 2026-02-11 General Government and Capital Outlay

    Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (5-Y 0-N)

  3. 2026-02-10 General Government and Capital Outlay

    Assigned HAPP sub: General Government and Capital Outlay

  4. 2026-02-10 General Laws

    Reported from General Laws and referred to Appropriations (21-Y 0-N)

  5. 2026-02-05 Professions/Occupations and Administrative Process

    Subcommittee recommends reporting and referring to Appropriations (8-Y 0-N)

  6. 2026-02-05 House

    Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB1514)

  7. 2026-02-02 Professions/Occupations and Administrative Process

    Assigned HGL sub: Professions/Occupations and Administrative Process

  8. 2026-01-23 House

    Presented and ordered printed 26105693D

  9. 2026-01-23 General Laws

    Referred to Committee on General Laws

Official Summary Text

Employment decisions; automated decision systems; civil penalty.
Provides that the Director of the Department of Human Resource Management shall require any state agency that uses an automated decision system as a substantial factor in any employment decision, as those terms are defined in the bill, to (i) ensure that such system and the use of such system complies with federal and state law, (ii) make certain disclosures, (iii) provide an opt-out mechanism, (iv) annually test such system, (v) ensure data security, and (vi) train agency staff on such system. The bill requires the Department and local government employers to establish and publicize a process for applicants for employment and employees to file concerns and complaints regarding the use of automated decision systems in such employment decisions and a process for the investigation and resolution of any such concerns and complaints.

The bill also provides that no final employment decision shall be made by an employer without the involvement of a human decision maker, and no employer shall solely use any recommendation or prediction from an automated decision system to make a final employment decision. The bill subjects violating employers to civil penalties.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
A BILL to amend the Code of Virginia by adding sections numbered
2.2-1202.2
and
15.2-1500.2
and by adding in Article 1 of Chapter 3 of Title 40.1 a section numbered
40.1-28.7:12
, relating to employment decisions;
automated decision systems; civil penalty
.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:

1. That the Code of Virginia is amended by adding sections numbered
2.2-1202.2
and
15.2-1500.2
and by adding in Article 1 of Chapter 3 of Title 40.1 a section numbered
40.1-28.7:12
as follows:

§
2.2-1202.2
. Additional powers and duties of Director;
automated decision systems
.

A.
For purposes of this section
:

"Algorithmic discrimination" means the use of an artificial intelligence system that results in an unlawful differential treatment or impact that disfavors an individual or group of individuals on the basis of their actual or perceived age, color, disability, ethnicity, genetic information, limited proficiency in the English language, national origin, race, religion, reproductive health, sex, sexual orientation, veteran status, or other classification protected under state or federal law.

"Artificial intelligence
system
" means
any machine learning-based system that, for any explicit or implicit objective, infers from the inputs such system receives how to generate outputs, including content, decisions, predictions, and recommendations, that can influence physical or virtual environments
.

"Automated decision system
" means any computational process, including those derived from artificial intelligence systems or machine learning, used to make or assist in making decisions related to employment.
"
Automated decision system
" does not include identity and access management tools, c
alculators, databases, datasets, or other compilations of data.

"Employment decision" means
a decision related to an individual's employment status, including
the
recruitment, hiring, promotion,
discipline,
or termination of an employee. "Employment decision"
includes
a decision related to
the content publicized for the recruitment of individuals for an employment opportunity, but
does not include
a
decision related to the
tools used
to advertise or market an employment opportunity
.

"Personal data" means the same as that term is defined in §
59.1-575
.

"Substantial factor" means a factor that
is
(i)
used as
the principal basis for making
an employment
decision, (ii) capable of altering the outcome of
an employment
decision, and (iii) generated by an
automated decision
system. "Substantial factor" includes any use of an
automated decision
system to generate any content, decision, prediction, or recommendation concerning a
n individual
that
has a legal or similarly significant effect on an
employment
decision concerning the
individual
.

B.
The Director shall
require

any
state agenc
y that uses an
automated decision system
as a substantial factor
in
any
employment
decision

to:

1. Ensure that
t
he

automated decision system
and the use of such
system
compl
ies
with
federal and state law, including the Virginia Human Rights Act (§
2.2-3900
et seq.);

2. Disclose (i) the fact that an
automated decision system
is being used; (
ii
) the intended
use of the
automated decision system
, including evaluating job candidates, making compensation decisions, or considering employees for promotion; (iii) the
type of data
inputs received by the
automated decision system
and the source o
f such data
; (iv) how the
automated decision system
will be used in the
state
agency's decision-making processes; and (v) the extent to which an individual's personal data will be shared with third parties or used
as future inputs for
the
automated decision system
;

3. Provide to all individuals
the right to opt out of the use of the
automated decision system for employment decisions
and a process by which individuals with disabilities may seek accommodations for the
automated decision system
;

4. Annually test
, or ensure that an appropriate contractor
employed by such agency
annually tests,

the

automated decision system
for
algorithmic discrimination
and certify its compliance with federal and state law;

5. Ensure that
state agency
st
aff who handle
personal
data collected by
the
automated decision system
and the storage of such data do so in accordance with federal and state law and all
state
agency data agreements and privacy policies; and

6. Train
state agency
staff who
use the

automated decision system
for employment
decisions
to comply with applicable federal and state law and ensure that
the
automated decision system
does not result in algorithmic discrimination
.

C.
No employment decision shall be made by a state agency without the involvement of a human decision maker.
No state agency shall
solely use any recommendation or prediction from an automated decision system to make an employment decision.

D.
The Department shall establish and publicize a process for applicants for employment and employees to file concerns and complaints
regarding
the use of

automated decision systems
in the Commonwealth's employment
decisions
and a process for the investigation and resolution of any such concerns and complaints.
Such
process shall be separate and apart from the dispute resolution proces
s described in
§
2.2-120
2.1.

§
15.2-1
5
0
0
.
2
.
Employment decisions; use of automated decision system prohibited
.

A.
As used in this section, unless the context requires a different meaning
:

"Algorithmic discrimination" means the use of an artificial intelligence system that results in an unlawful differential treatment or impact that disfavors an individual or group of individuals on the basis of their actual or perceived age, color, disability, ethnicity, genetic information, limited proficiency in the English language, national origin, race, religion, reproductive health, sex, sexual orientation, veteran status, or other classification protected under state or federal law.

"Artificial intelligence system" means any machine learning-based system that, for any explicit or implicit objective, infers from the inputs such system receives how to generate outputs, including content, decisions, predictions, and recommendations, that can influence physical or virtual environments.

"Automated decision system" means any computational process, including those derived from artificial intelligence systems or machine learning, used to make or assist in making decisions related to employment. "Automated decision system" does not include identity and access management tools, calculators, databases, datasets, or other compilations of data.

"Employment decision" means a decision related to an individual's employment status, including the recruitment, hiring, promotion,
discipline,
or termination of an employee. "Employment decision" includes a decision related to the content publicized for the recruitment of individuals for an employment opportunity, but does not include a decision related to the tools used to advertise or market an employment opportunity.

"Personal data" means the same as that term is defined in §
59.1-575
.

"Substantial factor" means a factor that is (i) used as the principal basis for making an employment decision, (ii) capable of altering the outcome of an employment decision, and (iii) generated by an automated decision system. "Substantial factor" includes any use of an automated decision system to generate any content, decision, prediction, or recommendation concerning an individual that has a legal or similarly significant effect on an employment decision concerning the individual.

B.
Any department, office, board, commission, agency, or instrumentality of local government
that uses an automated decision system as a substantial factor in any employment decision
shall
:

1. Ensure that the automated decision system and the use of such system complies with federal and state law, including the Virginia Human Rights Act (§
2.2-3900
et seq.);

2. Disclose (i) the fact that an automated decision system is being used; (ii) the intended use of the automated decision system, including evaluating job candidates, making compensation decisions, or considering employees for promotion; (iii) the type of data inputs received by the automated decision system and the source of such data; (iv) how the automated decision system will be used in the decision-making processes
of the department, office, board, commission, agency, or instrumentality of local government
; and (v) the extent to which an individual's personal data will be shared with third parties or used as future inputs for the automated decision system;

3. Provide to all individuals the right to opt out of the use of the automated decision system for employment decisions and a process by which individuals with disabilities may seek accommodations for the automated decision system;

4. Annually test, or ensure that an appropriate contractor employed by such
department, office, board, commission, agency, or instrumentality of local government
annually tests, the automated decision system for algorithmic discrimination and certify its compliance with federal and state law;

5. Ensure that
the staff of the
department, office, board, commission, agency, or instrumentality of local government
who handle personal data collected by the automated decision system and the storage of such data do so in accordance with federal and state law and all data agreements and privacy policies
of such department, office, board, commission, agency, or instrumentality of local government
; and

6. Train
the staff of the department, office, board, commission, agency, or instrumentality of local government
who use the automated decision system for employment decisions to comply with applicable federal and state law and ensure that the automated decision system does not result in algorithmic discrimination.

C.
No employment decision shall be made by
a department, office, board, commission, agency, or instrumentality of local government
without the involvement of a human
decision maker.
No department, office, board, commission, agency, or instrumentality of local government shall solely use any recommendation or prediction from an automated decision system to make an employment decision.

D.
Any

department, office, board, commission, agency, or instrumentality of local government
that uses an automated decision system as a substantial factor in any employment decision
shall establish and publicize a process for applicants for employment and employees to file concerns and complaints regarding the use of automated decision systems in employment decisions and a process for the investigation and resolution of any such concerns and complaints.

§
40.1-28.7:12
. Empl
oyment decisions; use of
automated decision system prohibited; civil penalty.

A. As used in this section:

"Artificial intelligence system" means any machine learning-based system that, for any explicit or implicit objective, infers from the inputs such system receives how to generate outputs, including content, decisions, predictions, and recommendations, that can influence physical or virtual environments.

"Automated decision system" means any computational process, including those derived from artificial intelligence systems or machine learning, used to make or assist in making decisions related to employment. "Automated decision system" does not include identity and access management tools, calculators, databases, datasets, or other compilations of data.

"Employer"

means the same as that term is defined in §
40.1-2
.

"Employment decision" means a
ny final
decision
made by an employer
related to an individual's employment status, including the recruitment, hiring, promotion,
discipline,
or termination of an employee. "Employment decision" includes a decision related to the content publicized for the recruitment of individuals for an employment opportunity, but does not include a decision related to the tools used to advertise or market an employment opportunity.

B.
No employment decision shall be made by an employer without the involvement of a human
decision maker. No employer shall
solely
use any recommendation or prediction from an automated de
cision system to make an employment decision.

C.
Any employer that knowingly violates the provisions of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $
5
00 for
a first
violation
and $1,500 for each subsequent violation
. The Commissioner shall notify any employer that he alleges has violated the provisions of this section by certified mail. Such notice shall contain a description of the alleged violation. Within 15 days of receipt of notice of the alleged violation, the employer may request an informal conference regarding such violation with the Commissioner. In determining the amount of any penalty to be imposed, the Commissioner shall consider the size of the business of the employer charged and the gravity of the violation. The decision of the Commissioner shall be final. Civil penalties under this section shall be assessed by the Commissioner and paid to the Literary Fund. The Commissioner shall prescribe procedures for the payment of proposed penalties that are not contested by employers.

E
. The Commissioner or his authorized representative shall have the right to petition a circuit court for injunctive or such other relief as may be necessary for the enforcement of this section.