Back to Virginia

SB339 • 2026

SCC; cost allocation proceedings for certain electric utilities, definitions.

<p class=ldtitle>A BILL to direct the State Corporation Commission to conduct proceedings to review cost allocation among different customer classifications for certain electric utilities.</p>

Energy
Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Perry
Last action
2026-03-05
Official status
Continued
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source material does not specify how the State Corporation Commission will enforce compliance with its findings or what penalties may apply for unfair cost allocation.

State Corporation Commission Reviews Cost Allocation for Electric Utilities

This bill directs the State Corporation Commission to review how electric utilities allocate costs among different types of customers, focusing on whether non-high-load customers are unfairly paying for high-load customer expenses.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires the State Corporation Commission to examine if transmission costs are fairly shared between high-load and other customers for Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power by January 1, 2027.
  • Directs the Commission to review how generation and distribution costs are allocated among different customer groups for Dominion Energy by January 1, 2028.
  • Requires the utility company to propose at least three alternative cost allocation methods for the Commission's consideration.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Electric utilities like Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power
  • High-load customers of electric utilities
  • Other customers who are not classified as high-load

Terms To Know

High-load customer
A retail electric service customer that uses a large amount of electricity, typically under commercial or industrial rate schedules.
Phase I Utility and Phase II Utility
Specific categories of electric utilities as defined by Virginia law.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify the exact penalties for unfair cost allocation.
  • It is unclear how the Commission will enforce compliance with its findings.
  • The effective date has not been set, and the bill was continued to 2027 in Labor and Commerce.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-05 Labor and Commerce

    Continued to 2027 in Labor and Commerce (Voice Vote)

  2. 2026-03-03 Subcommittee #3

    Subcommittee recommends continuing to 2027 (Voice Vote)

  3. 2026-03-03 Subcommittee #3

    House subcommittee offered

  4. 2026-02-26 Commerce and Labor

    Fiscal Impact Statement from State Corporation Commission (SB339)

  5. 2026-02-24 House

    Placed on Calendar

  6. 2026-02-24 House

    Read first time

  7. 2026-02-24 Labor and Commerce

    Referred to Committee on Labor and Commerce

  8. 2026-02-24 Subcommittee #3

    Assigned HCL sub: Subcommittee #3

  9. 2026-02-17 Senate

    Read third time and passed Senate (40-Y 0-N 0-A)

  10. 2026-02-16 Senate

    Read second time

  11. 2026-02-16 Senate

    Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute (Voice Vote)

  12. 2026-02-16 Commerce and Labor

    Committee substitute agreed to (Voice Vote)

  13. 2026-02-16 Senate

    Engrossed by Senate (Voice Vote)

  14. 2026-02-13 Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. 2026-02-13 Senate

    Passed by for the day

  16. 2026-02-13 Commerce and Labor

    Committee substitute printed 26107935D-S1

  17. 2026-02-13 Senate

    Constitutional reading dispensed Block Vote (on 1st reading) (35-Y 0-N 0-A)

  18. 2026-02-12 Commerce and Labor

    Reported from Commerce and Labor with substitute (14-Y 1-N)

  19. 2026-02-12 Senate

    Senate committee offered

  20. 2026-02-03 Senate

    Fiscal Impact Statement from State Corporation Commission (SB339)

  21. 2026-01-13 Senate

    Prefiled and ordered printed; Offered 01-14-2026 26104824D

  22. 2026-01-13 Commerce and Labor

    Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor

Official Summary Text

State Corporation Commission; cost allocation proceedings for certain electric utilities.
Directs the State Corporation Commission to conduct proceedings to review cost allocation among different customer classifications for certain electric utilities. For Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power, the Commission is directed to determine if the cost allocation of transmission costs require customers that are not high-load customers, as defined in the bill, to unreasonably subsidize the transmission costs attributable to serving high-load customers by January 1, 2027. For Dominion Energy, the Commission is directed to determine if the current allocation of generation and distribution costs require customers that are not high-load customers to unreasonably subsidize the generation and distribution costs attributable to serving high-load customers by January 1, 2028.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
SENATE BILL NO. 339

AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE

(Proposed by the House Committee on Labor and Commerce

on ________________)

(Patron Prior to Substitute--Senator Perry)

A BILL to direct the State Corporation Commission to conduct proceedings to review cost allocation among different customer classifications for certain electric utilities.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:

1.
§ 1.
The State Corporation Commission (the Commission) shall initiate
a
proceeding to determine if current
and proposed
allocation
s
of transmission costs among different customer classifications
of service for Phase I and Phase II Utilities,
or
the allocation
s
of transmission costs to

an electric utility or customers
of an electric utility
receiving

transmission service from a Phase I
Utility
or Phase II Utility
,

require customers that are not
high-load customers
to unreasonably subsidize the
transmission
cost
s attributable to serving customers that are
high-load customers
.

In conducting such proceeding, the Commission shall ensure to the maximum extent possible that the costs of any transmission projects that are designed, constructed, or operated solely or prim
arily to serve
high-load
customers are not recovered from any other customers of the Phase I
Utility
or Phase II Utility. For the purposes of such proceeding, a
project

to
s
erve
one or more
high-load
customers
that is classified as a supplemental transmission project by the regional transmission entity
shall be presumed to be designed, constructed, or operated solely or primarily to serve
high-load
customers, unless otherwise demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence
. The Commission shall complete such proceedings by January 1, 2027.
The Commission may comply with the requirements of this section
by incorporating the provisions of this section in an ongoing proceeding for a Phase I
Utility
or Phase II Utility.

§ 2. The Commission shall initiate a proceeding to determine if the current allocation of generation and di
stribution costs among different customer classifications of service for a Phase II Utility

requires customers that are not
high-load customers
to unreasonably subsidize the
generation and distribution
costs attributable to serving
high-load
customer
s
.
In conducting such proceeding, the Commission shall direct the Phase II Utility to propose at least three alternative cost allocations for the Commission's consideration, provided in executable formats that can be fully replicated, and at least one such alternative cost allocation shall represent the prob
ability of dispatch methodology as described in the electric utility cost allocation manual published by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. The Commission may order any changes to the Phase II Utility's cost allocation structure that the Commission determines to be appropriate to a
llocate costs appropriately among
high-load
customers and other customers of the Phase II Utility. The Commission shall complete such proceedings by January 1, 2028. The Commission may comply with the requirements of this section by incorporating the provisions of this section in an ongoing proceeding for a Phase II Utility or by incorporating such provisions
in the Phase II Utility's biennial rate review proceeding conducted pursuant to §
56-585.1
of the Code of Virginia.

§ 3. The Commi
ssion
may adopt any regulations or guidelines necessary to comply with the provisions of this act.

§ 4. For the purposes of this act:

"High-load customer" means a
retail electric service
customer of a Phase I
Utility
or Phase II Utility that
(i)
takes service under such utility's commercial or industrial rate schedule
; (ii)
contracts for an electric demand of 25 megawatts or greater
and an anticipated or measured average annual electric load factor of 75 percent or greater; and (iii) as of January 1, 2026, did
not maintain a full-time equivalent employment workforce
of at least 200 individuals
engaged in manufacturing or industrial activities at a facility located within the service territory of a Phase I
Utility,
a

Phase II Utility
,
or an electric cooperative organized under Article 1 (§ 56
-
231.15 et seq
.) of Chapter 9.1 of Title 56
of the Code of Virginia
.

"Phase I Utility" and "Phase II Utility" have the same meaning as provided in subdivision A 1 of §
56-585.1
of the Code of Virginia.

"Transmission costs" includes the downstream costs associated with upgrades or modifications to interconnection or distribution infrastructure
necessitated
to implement a transmission project.