Back to Washington

HB1135 • 2026

Local government planning

Ensuring that local government planning complies with the growth management act.

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Representative Duerr, Representative Parshley, Representative Berry, Representative Fitzgibbon, Representative Doglio, Representative Peterson, Representative Wylie, Representative Berg, Representative Davis, Representative Lekanoff, Representative Hill
Last action
2025-03-04
Official status
H subst for
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Local government planning

Local government planning

What This Bill Does

  • Local government planning

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

1135-S AMH GRIF WRIK 386

64 • Griffey

WITHDRAWN

Plain English: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH ....

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH ....
  • WRIK 386 1 - Official Print EFFECT:  Removes prohibition on the Growth Management Hearings Board (GMHB) issuing a finding of compliance unless the county or city has amended the noncompliant portion of a plan or regulation and the resulting plan or regulation is compliant.
  •  Requires that the GMHB issue a finding of compliance if a city or county has amended the noncompliant portion of a plan or regulation and the amendment corrects the noncompliant provision.
  • 1135-S AMH GRIF WRIK 386 SHB 1135 - H AMD 64 By Representative Griffey WITHDRAWN 03/04/2025 On page 1, beginning on line 16, after "(b)" strike all material through "chapter" on line 20 and insert "The board must issue a finding of compliance if the county or city has amended the portion of the plan or regulations that was found noncompliant and the amended language or action corrects the noncompliant provision" --- END
1135-S AMH PENN WRIK 385

65 • Penner

WITHDRAWN

Plain English: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH ....

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH ....
  • WRIK 385 1 - Official Print EFFECT: Prohibits the Growth Management Hearings Board from recommending that the Governor impose sanctions on a local government for noncompliance with the Growth Management Act if the jurisdiction has taken action to address the noncompliance.
  • 1135-S AMH PENN WRIK 385 SHB 1135 - H AMD 65 By Representative Penner WITHDRAWN 03/04/2025 On page 2, line 20, after "imposed." strike "The" and insert "((The)) This recommendation may only be made if the jurisdiction has failed to take action to address the noncompliance, and the" --- END
1135-S AMH JACO WRIK 387

67 • Jacobsen

WITHDRAWN

Plain English: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH ....

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH ....
  • WRIK 387 1 - Official Print EFFECT:  Requires the Growth Management Hearings Board (GMHB) to identify the specific rule or statutory requirement that a local government is not compliant with when the GMHB finds that a local government remains out of compliance following a compliance hearing.
  •  Requires that, when transmitting a finding of noncompliance to the Governor, the GMHB must include the specific statutory language or rule that needs to be addressed, the reasons for the GMHB's finding of continued noncompliance, and any known efforts from the local government to correct the noncompliance.
  • 1135-S AMH JACO WRIK 387 SHB 1135 - H AMD 67 By Representative Jacobsen WITHDRAWN 03/04/2025 On page 2, line 12, after "compliance" insert "with a specific rule or statutory requirement" On page 2, line 13, after "governor" insert "documenting the specific language in statute or rule that needs to be addressed, the reasons for the board's determination of noncompliance, and any known efforts by the county or city to correct the finding of noncompliance" --- END
1135-S AMH COUT WRIK 388

68 • Couture

WITHDRAWN

Plain English: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH ....

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH ....
  • WRIK 388 1 - Official Print EFFECT:  Removes the prohibition on the Growth Management Hearings Board (GMHB) issuing a finding of compliance until noncompliant portions of a plan or regulation have been amended and the resulting plan or regulation has been found compliant.
  •  Requires the GMHB, when making a determination on whether to find continued noncompliance, to first make a finding of whether the Legislature has fully provided for the cost to the city or county to comply with statutory updates or new requirements, and, if the GMHB finds that that Legislature has not done so, prohibits the GMHB from issuing an order for the city or county to correct the noncompliant plan or regulation until after sufficient resources have been provided.
  • 1135-S AMH COUT WRIK 388 SHB 1135 - H AMD 68 By Representative Couture WITHDRAWN 03/04/2025 On page 1, beginning on line 16, after "(b)" strike all material through "(c)" on page 2, line 1 On page 2, at the beginning of line 4, strike "(d)" and insert "(c)" On page 2, after line 29, insert the following: "(6) When determining whether to make a finding of noncompliance under this section against a county or city, the board must first make a finding about whether the city or county was provided with sufficient financial resources by the legislature to fully provide for the cost for the city or county to comply with statutory updates or new requirements.
ADOPTED

Plain English: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH DUER WRIK 391 1 - Official Print EFFECT: Replaces a requirement that, in order for the Growth Management Hearings Board to issue a finding of compliance after an initial finding of noncompliance, the noncompliant plan or regulations must be amended and the resulting plan or regulations must be in compliance with the Growth Management Act (GMA), and instead requires that the noncompliant plan or regulation must be amended and the amendments addressing the noncompliance must compliant with the GMA.

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH DUER WRIK 391 1 - Official Print EFFECT: Replaces a requirement that, in order for the Growth Management Hearings Board to issue a finding of compliance after an initial finding of noncompliance, the noncompliant plan or regulations must be amended and the resulting plan or regulations must be in compliance with the Growth Management Act (GMA), and instead requires that the noncompliant plan or regulation must be amended and the amendments addressing the noncompliance must compliant with the GMA.
  • 1135-S AMH DUER WRIK 391 SHB 1135 - H AMD 69 By Representative Duerr ADOPTED 03/04/2025 On page 1, beginning on line 18, after "the" strike "resulting plan or regulations subject to" and insert "amendments addressing" --- END
WITHDRAWN

Plain English: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH ....

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH ....
  • WRIK 390 1 - Official Print EFFECT: Prohibits the Growth Management Hearings Board from issuing a finding of noncompliance based on a portion of a plan or regulation that was not included in the petition for review that initiated the review process.
  • 1135-S AMH ABEL WRIK 390 SHB 1135 - H AMD 75 By Representative Abell WITHDRAWN 03/04/2025 On page 1, line 20, after "chapter." insert "The board may not issue a finding of noncompliance based on a portion of a plan or regulation that was not included in the petition for review, as such a finding would violate due process of law." --- END
1135-S AMH ENGE WRIK 389

78 • Engell

NOT ADOPTED

Plain English: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH ....

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1135-S AMH ....
  • WRIK 389 1 - Official Print EFFECT: Prohibits the Growth Management Hearings Board from issuing a finding of continued noncompliance against a frontier county, and instead allows for the issuance of a correction order.
  • 1135-S AMH ENGE WRIK 389 SHB 1135 - H AMD 78 By Representative Engell NOT ADOPTED 03/04/2025 On page 1, line 20, after "chapter." insert "Frontier counties may not be issued with a noncompliance order under this section, and may instead only be issued an order for correction." On page 2, after line 29, insert the following: "(6) Frontier counties may not be issued with a noncompliance order under this section, and may instead only be issued an order for correction.
  • For the purposes of this section, "frontier county" means a county with a population density of fewer than 50 persons per square mile as determined by the office of financial management." --- END

Bill History

  1. 2025-03-04 House

    1st substitute bill substituted.

Official Summary Text

Local government planning

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
AN ACT Relating to ensuring that local government planning 1
complies with the growth management act; and amending RCW 36.70A.302 2
and 36.70A.330. 3
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:4
Sec. 1. RCW 36.70A.302 and 2010 c 211 s 10 are each amended to 5
read as follows: 6
(1) The board may determine that part or all of a comprehensive 7
plan or development regulations are invalid if the board:8
(a) Makes a finding of noncompliance and issues an order of 9
remand under RCW 36.70A.300; 10
(b) Includes in the final order a determination, supported by 11
findings of fact and conclusions of law, that the continued validity 12
of part or parts of the plan or regulation would substantially 13
interfere with the fulfillment of the goals of this chapter; and14
(c) Specifies in the final order the particular part or parts of 15
the plan or regulation that are determined to be invalid, and the 16
reasons for their invalidity. 17
(2) A determination of invalidity is prospective in effect and 18
does not extinguish rights that vested under state or local law 19
before receipt of the board's order by the city or county. The 20
determination of invalidity does not apply to a completed development 21
H-0236.1
HOUSE BILL 1135
State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session
By Representatives Duerr, Parshley, Berry, Fitzgibbon, Doglio,
Peterson, Wylie, Berg, Davis, Lekanoff, and Hill
Prefiled 12/26/24. Read first time 01/13/25. Referred to Committee
on Local Government.
p. 1 HB 1135
permit application for a project that vested under state or local law 1
before receipt of the board's order by the county or city or to 2
related construction permits for that project. 3
(3)(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this 4
section and (b) of this subsection, a development permit application 5
not vested under state or local law before receipt of the board's 6
order by the county or city vests to the local ordinance or 7
resolution that is determined by the board not to substantially 8
interfere with the fulfillment of the goals of this chapter.9
(b) Even though the application is not vested under state or 10
local law before receipt by the county or city of the board's order, 11
a determination of invalidity does not apply to a development permit 12
application for: 13
(i) A permit for construction by any owner, lessee, or contract 14
purchaser of a single -family residence for his or her own use or for 15
the use of his or her family on a lot existing before receipt by the 16
county or city of the board's order, except as otherwise specifically 17
provided in the board's order to protect the public health and 18
safety; 19
(ii) A building permit and related construction permits for 20
remodeling, tenant improvements, or expansion of an existing 21
structure on a lot existing before receipt of the board's order by 22
the county or city; and 23
(iii) A boundary line adjustment or a division of land that does 24
not increase the number of buildable lots existing before receipt of 25
the board's order by the county or city. 26
(4) If the ordinance that adopts a plan or development regulation 27
under this chapter includes a savings clause intended to revive prior 28
policies or regulations in the event the new plan or regulations are 29
determined to be invalid, the board shall determine under subsection 30
(1) of this section whether the prior policies or regulations are 31
valid during the period of remand. 32
(5) A county or city subject to a determination of invalidity may 33
adopt interim controls and other measures to be in effect until it 34
adopts a comprehensive plan and development regulations that comply 35
with the requirements of this chapter. A development permit 36
application may vest under an interim control or measure upon 37
determination by the board that the interim controls and other 38
measures do not substantially interfere with the fulfillment of the 39
goals of this chapter. 40
p. 2 HB 1135
(6) A county or city subject to a determination of invalidity may 1
file a motion requesting that the board clarify, modify, or rescind 2
the order. The board shall expeditiously schedule a hearing on the 3
motion. At the hearing on the motion, the parties may present 4
information to the board to clarify the part or parts of the 5
comprehensive plan or development regulations to which the final 6
order applies. The board shall issue any supplemental order based on 7
the information provided at the hearing not later than ((thirty)) 30 8
days after the date of the hearing. 9
(7)(a) If a determination of invalidity has been made and the 10
county or city has enacted an ordinance or resolution amending or 11
repealing the invalidated part or parts of the plan or regulation or 12
establishing interim controls on development affected by the order of 13
invalidity, after a compliance hearing, the board shall modify or 14
rescind the determination of invalidity if it determines under the 15
standard in subsection (1) of this section that the plan or 16
regulation, as amended or made subject to such interim controls , or 17
as exists after invalidated portions of the plan or regulation have 18
been repealed , will no longer substantially interfere with the 19
fulfillment of the goals of this chapter. 20
(b) If the board determines that part or parts of the plan or 21
regulation are no longer invalid as provided in this subsection, but 22
does not find that the plan or regulation is in compliance with all 23
of the requirements of this chapter, the board, in its order, may 24
require periodic reports to the board on the progress the 25
jurisdiction is making towards compliance. 26
Sec. 2. RCW 36.70A.330 and 2021 c 312 s 2 are each amended to 27
read as follows: 28
(1) After the time set for complying with the requirements of 29
this chapter under RCW 36.70A.300(3)(b) has expired, or at an earlier 30
time upon the motion of a county or city subject to a determination 31
of invalidity under RCW 36.70A.300, the board shall set a hearing for 32
the purpose of determining whether the state agency, county, or city 33
is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter.34
(2) The board shall conduct a hearing and issue a finding of 35
compliance or noncompliance with the requirements of this chapter and 36
with any compliance schedule established by the board in its final 37
order. The board may not issue a finding of compliance if a county or 38
city subject to a determination of invalidity under RCW 36.70A.300 39
p. 3 HB 1135
has repealed the plan or regulations that were found noncompliant, 1
unless the plan or regulations that will be in effect after such a 2
repeal are compliant with the requirements of this chapter. A person 3
with standing to challenge the legislation enacted in response to the 4
board's final order may participate in the hearing along with the 5
petitioner and the state agency, county, or city. A hearing under 6
this subsection shall be given the highest priority of business to be 7
conducted by the board, and a finding shall be issued within ((forty-8
five)) 45 days of the filing of the motion under subsection (1) of 9
this section with the board. The board shall issue any order 10
necessary to make adjustments to the compliance schedule and set 11
additional hearings as provided in subsection (5) of this section.12
(3) If the board after a compliance hearing finds that the state 13
agency, county, or city is not in compliance, the board shall 14
transmit its finding to the governor. 15
(a) The board may refer a finding of noncompliance to the 16
department. The purpose of the referral is for the department to 17
provide technical assistance to facilitate speedy resolution of the 18
finding of noncompliance and to provide training pursuant to RCW 19
36.70A.332 as necessary. 20
(b) Alternatively, the board may recommend to the governor that 21
the sanctions authorized by this chapter be imposed. The board shall 22
take into consideration the county's or city's efforts to meet its 23
compliance schedule in making the decision to recommend sanctions to 24
the governor. 25
(4) In a compliance hearing upon petition of a party, the board 26
shall also reconsider its final order and decide, if no determination 27
of invalidity has been made, whether one now should be made under RCW 28
36.70A.302. 29
(5) The board shall schedule additional hearings as appropriate 30
pursuant to subsections (1) and (2) of this section.31
--- END ---
p. 4 HB 1135