Back to Washington

HB1457 • 2026

SVP electronic monitoring

Requiring electronic monitoring of sexually violent predators granted conditional release.

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Representative Griffey, Representative Couture, Representative Burnett, Representative Graham, Representative Leavitt, Representative Davis, Representative Valdez, Representative Jacobsen, Representative Klicker, Representative Eslick, Representative Simmons
Last action
2025-04-11
Official status
C 33 L 25
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

SVP electronic monitoring

SVP electronic monitoring

What This Bill Does

  • SVP electronic monitoring

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2025-04-11 House

    Effective date 7/27/2025.

Official Summary Text

SVP electronic monitoring

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
AN ACT Relating to improving community safety by requiring 1
electronic monitoring of sexually violent predators granted 2
conditional release to a less restrictive alternative; and amending 3
RCW 71.09.096. 4
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:5
Sec. 1. RCW 71.09.096 and 2021 c 236 s 6 are each amended to 6
read as follows: 7
(1) If the court or jury determines that conditional release to a 8
less restrictive alternative is in the best interest of the person 9
and includes conditions that would adequately protect the community, 10
and the court determines that the minimum conditions set forth in RCW 11
71.09.092 and in this section are met, the court shall enter judgment 12
and direct a conditional release. 13
(2) The court shall impose any additional conditions necessary to 14
ensure compliance with treatment and to protect the community. If the 15
court finds that conditions do not exist that will both ensure the 16
person's compliance with treatment and protect the community, then 17
the person shall be remanded to the custody of the department of 18
social and health services for control, care, and treatment in a 19
secure facility as designated in RCW 71.09.060(1).20
H-0410.1
HOUSE BILL 1457
State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session
By Representatives Griffey, Couture, Burnett, Graham, Leavitt, Davis,
Caldier, Jacobsen, Klicker, Eslick, and Simmons
Read first time 01/21/25. Referred to Committee on Community Safety.
p. 1 HB 1457
(3) If the service provider designated by the court to provide 1
inpatient or outpatient treatment or to monitor or supervise any 2
other terms and conditions of a person's placement in a less 3
restrictive alternative is other than the department of social and 4
health services or the department of corrections, then the service 5
provider so designated must agree in writing to provide such 6
treatment, monitoring, or supervision in accord with this section. 7
Any person providing or agreeing to provide treatment, monitoring, or 8
supervision services pursuant to this chapter may be compelled to 9
testify and any privilege with regard to such person's testimony is 10
deemed waived. 11
(4)(a) Prior to authorizing any release to a less restrictive 12
alternative, the court shall impose such conditions upon the person 13
as are necessary to ensure the safety of the community , which must 14
include, at minimum, the condition that the person will be subject to 15
electronic monitoring that, to the extent feasible, provides real-16
time tracking, programmable inclusion and exclusion zones, and the 17
ability to provide notifications if the person tampers with the 18
monitoring device or enters an exclusion zone . In imposing 19
conditions, the court must impose a restriction on the proximity of 20
the person's residence to public or private schools providing 21
instruction to kindergarten or any grades one through 12 in 22
accordance with RCW 72.09.340. Courts shall require a minimum 23
distance restriction of 500 feet on the proximity of the person's 24
residence to child care facilities and public or private schools 25
providing instruction to kindergarten or any grades one through 12. 26
The court shall order the department of corrections to investigate 27
the less restrictive alternative and, within 60 days of the order to 28
investigate, recommend any additional conditions to the court. These 29
conditions shall be individualized to address the person's specific 30
risk factors and criminogenic needs and may include, but are not 31
limited to (([,])), the following: Specification of residence or 32
restrictions on residence including distance restrictions, 33
specification of contact with a reasonable number of individuals upon 34
the person's request who are verified by the department of 35
corrections to be appropriate social contacts, prohibition of contact 36
with potential or past victims, prohibition of alcohol and other drug 37
use, participation in a specific course of inpatient or outpatient 38
treatment that may include monitoring by the use of polygraph and 39
plethysmograph, monitoring through the use of global positioning 40
p. 2 HB 1457
system technology, supervision by a department of corrections 1
community corrections officer, a requirement that the person remain 2
within the state unless the person receives prior authorization by 3
the court, and any other conditions that the court determines are in 4
the best interest of the person or others. A copy of the conditions 5
of release shall be given to the person and to any designated service 6
providers. 7
(b) To the greatest extent possible, the person, person's 8
counsel, prosecuting agency responsible for the initial commitment, 9
treatment provider, supervising community corrections officer, and 10
appropriate clinical staff of the special commitment center shall 11
meet and collaborate to craft individualized, narrowly tailored, and 12
empirically based conditions to present to the court to help 13
facilitate the person's successful transition to the community.14
(5)(a) Prior to authorizing release to a less restrictive 15
alternative proposed by the department, the court shall consider 16
whether the person's less restrictive alternative placement is in 17
accordance with fair share principles. To ensure equitable 18
distribution of releases, and prevent the disproportionate grouping 19
of persons subject to less restrictive orders in any one county, or 20
in any one jurisdiction or community within a county, the legislature 21
finds it is appropriate for releases to a less restrictive 22
alternative to occur in a manner that adheres to fair share 23
principles. The legislature recognizes that there may be reasons why 24
the department may not recommend that a person be released to his or 25
her county of commitment, including availability of individualized 26
resources, the person's support needs, or when the court determines 27
that the person's return to his or her county of commitment would be 28
inappropriate considering any court-issued protection orders, victim 29
safety concerns that cannot be addressed through use of global 30
positioning system technology, the unavailability of appropriate 31
treatment or facilities that would adequately protect the community, 32
negative influences on the person, and the location of family or 33
other persons or organizations offering support to the person. If the 34
court authorizes conditional release based on the department's 35
proposal to a county other than the county of commitment, the court 36
shall enter specific findings regarding its decision and identify 37
whether the release remains in line with fair share principles.38
(b)(i) When the department develops a less restrictive 39
alternative placement under this section, it shall attempt to 40
p. 3 HB 1457
identify a placement satisfying the requirements of RCW 71.09.092 1
that is aligned with fair share principles. The department shall 2
document its rationale for the recommended placement.3
(ii) If the department does not support or recommend conditional 4
release to a less restrictive alternative due to a clinical 5
determination, the department shall document its objection and 6
certify that the department is developing the less restrictive 7
alternative pursuant to a court order and not because of a clinical 8
determination. 9
(iii) When the department develops or proposes a less restrictive 10
alternative placement under this chapter, it shall be considered a 11
predisposition recommendation. 12
(iv) In developing, modifying, and enforcing less restrictive 13
alternatives, the department shall be deemed to be performing a 14
quasi-judicial function. 15
(c) If the committed person is not conditionally released to his 16
or her county of commitment, the department shall provide the law and 17
justice council of the county in which the person is conditionally 18
released with notice and a written explanation, including whether the 19
department remains in compliance with fair share principles regarding 20
releases under this chapter. 21
(d) For purposes of this section, the person's county of 22
commitment means the county of the court which ordered the person's 23
commitment. 24
(e) This subsection (5) does not apply to releases to a secure 25
community transition facility under RCW 71.09.250.26
(6)(a) When ordered by the court, the department must provide 27
less restrictive alternative treatment that includes, at a minimum:28
(i) The services identified in the person's discharge plan as 29
outlined in RCW 71.09.080(4); 30
(ii) The assignment of a community care coordinator;31
(iii) Regular contacts with providers of court-ordered treatment 32
services; 33
(iv) Community escorts, if needed; 34
(v) A transition plan that addresses the person's access to 35
continued services upon unconditional discharge; 36
(vi) Financial support for necessary housing; 37
(vii) Life skills training and disability accommodations, if 38
needed; and 39
p. 4 HB 1457
(viii) Assistance in pursuing benefits, education, and 1
employment. 2
(b) At the time the department of corrections is ordered to 3
investigate a proposed less restrictive alternative placement, 4
subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific 5
purpose, the department shall assign a social worker to assist the 6
person with discharge planning, pursuing benefits, and coordination 7
of care prior to release. 8
(i) The social worker shall assist the person with completing 9
applications for benefits prior to the person's release from total 10
confinement. 11
(ii) To promote continuity of care and the individual's success 12
in the community, the department social worker shall be responsible 13
for initiating a clinical transition of care between the last 14
treating clinician at the special commitment center and the person's 15
designated community treatment provider. This transition between one 16
clinical setting to another shall occur no later than 15 days before 17
an individual's release from the special commitment center.18
(iii) If applicable, the social worker shall assist the person 19
with locating any needed disability accommodations in the community 20
and with obtaining resources to help address the person's identified 21
life skills needs prior to release from total confinement.22
(7) Any service provider designated to provide inpatient or 23
outpatient treatment shall monthly, or as otherwise directed by the 24
court, submit to the court, to the department of social and health 25
services facility from which the person was released, to the 26
prosecuting agency, and to the supervising community corrections 27
officer, a report stating whether the person is complying with the 28
terms and conditions of the conditional release to a less restrictive 29
alternative. 30
(8) Each person released to a less restrictive alternative shall 31
have his or her case reviewed by the court that released him or her 32
no later than one year after such release and annually thereafter 33
until the person is unconditionally discharged. Review may occur in a 34
shorter time or more frequently, if the court, in its discretion on 35
its own motion, or on motion of the person, the secretary, or the 36
prosecuting agency so determines. The questions to be determined by 37
the court are whether the person shall continue to be conditionally 38
released to a less restrictive alternative, and if so, whether a 39
modification to the person's less restrictive alternative order is 40
p. 5 HB 1457
appropriate to ensure the conditional release remains in the best 1
interest of the person and adequate to protect the victim and the 2
community. The court in making its determination shall be aided by 3
the periodic reports filed pursuant to subsection (7) of this section 4
and the opinions of the secretary and other experts or professional 5
persons. 6
--- END ---
p. 6 HB 1457