Back to Washington

SB5269 • 2026

Sentence modification

Providing judicial discretion to modify sentences in the interest of justice.

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Senator Frame, Senator Lovick, Senator Valdez, Senator Wellman, Senator Hasegawa, Senator Trudeau, Senator Saldaña, Senator Nobles, Senator C. Wilson
Last action
2026-01-12
Official status
S Law & Justice
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Sentence modification

Sentence modification

What This Bill Does

  • Sentence modification

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-01-12 Senate

    By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

Official Summary Text

Sentence modification

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
AN ACT Relating to providing judicial discretion to modify 1
sentences in the interest of justice; amending RCW 10.73.100 and 2
9.94A.535; adding a new section to chapter 9.94A RCW; adding a new 3
section to chapter 2.70 RCW; and creating new sections.4
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:5
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited 6
as the judicial discretion act.7
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. (1) The legislature finds that long-term 8
incarceration disproportionately impacts low-income communities and 9
communities of color. The legislature further finds that an expansive 10
body of research demonstrates that persons who are granted early 11
release before finishing lengthy sentences are less likely to 12
recidivate. The legislature further finds that establishing an 13
opportunity to modify a sentence encourages incarcerated individuals 14
to engage in desirable behavior and to take advantage of 15
rehabilitative programming. The legislature further finds that 16
because the cost of long-term incarceration is substantial and the 17
state must use its resources responsibly, providing judges the 18
opportunity to modify lengthy sentences in the interests of justice 19
will result in significant cost savings to the state.20
S-0253.1
SENATE BILL 5269
State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session
By Senators Frame, Lovick, Valdez, Wellman, Hasegawa, Trudeau,
Saldaña, Nobles, and C. Wilson
Read first time 01/14/25. Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.
p. 1 SB 5269
(2) Therefore, the legislature intends to authorize sentencing 1
courts to review lengthy sentences upon a showing that a person's 2
original sentence no longer serves the interests of justice.3
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 9.94A 4
RCW to read as follows: 5
(1) Except as provided in subsection (17) of this section, and 6
notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, any person under 7
a term of total confinement for a felony conviction may petition the 8
sentencing court or the sentencing court's successor for a 9
modification of sentence if the original sentence no longer serves 10
the interests of justice and the person meets any of the following 11
criteria: 12
(a) Beginning July 1, 2026, the person may petition the court if:13
(i) The person has served at least seven years of their sentence 14
for an offense committed at age 17 or younger; or 15
(ii) The person is terminally ill or experiences a permanent or 16
degenerative medical condition to such a degree that the person does 17
not presently and likely will not in the future pose a threat to 18
public safety. 19
(b) Beginning July 1, 2027, the person may petition the court if 20
the person meets any of the criteria in (a)(i) or (ii) of this 21
subsection, or if the person has served at least 20 years of their 22
sentence for an offense committed when the person was at least 18 23
years old but less than 25 years old. 24
(c) Beginning July 1, 2028, the person may petition the court if 25
the person meets any of the criteria in (a)(i) or (ii) of this 26
subsection, or if the person served at least 13 years of their 27
sentence for an offense committed when the person was at least 18 28
years old but less than 25 years old. 29
(d) Beginning July 1, 2029, the person may petition the court if 30
the person meets any of the criteria in (a)(i) or (ii) of this 31
subsection, or if: 32
(i) The person has served at least 13 years of their sentence for 33
an offense committed when the person was at least 18 years old but 34
less than 25 years old; or 35
(ii) The person has served at least 20 years of their sentence 36
for an offense committed at age 25 or older. 37
p. 2 SB 5269
(e) Beginning July 1, 2030, the person may petition the court if 1
the person meets any of the criteria in (a)(i) or (ii) of this 2
subsection, or if: 3
(i) The person has served at least 10 years of their sentence for 4
an offense committed when the person was at least 18 years old but 5
less than 25 years old; or 6
(ii) The person has served at least 17 years of their sentence 7
for an offense committed at age 25 or older. 8
(f) Beginning July 1, 2031, the person may petition the court if 9
the person meets any of the criteria in (a)(i) or (ii) of this 10
subsection, or if: 11
(i) The person has served at least 10 years of their sentence for 12
an offense committed when the person was at least 18 years old but 13
less than 25 years old; or 14
(ii) The person has served at least 13 years of their sentence 15
for an offense committed at age 25 or older. 16
(g) Beginning July 1, 2032, the person may petition the court if 17
the person meets any of the criteria in (a)(i) or (ii) of this 18
subsection, or if the person has served at least 10 years of their 19
sentence for an offense committed at age 18 or older.20
(h) If the person does not meet any of the criteria under (a) 21
through (g) of this subsection, the person may petition the court at 22
any time with the consent of the prosecuting attorney.23
(2) The petitioner must file the petition in writing with the 24
sentencing court in the judicial district in which the original 25
sentence was imposed and serve the prosecuting attorney. The petition 26
may include affidavits, declarations, letters, prison records, or 27
other written or electronic materials. The petition must include a 28
statement by the petitioner and supporting documentation 29
demonstrating that they meet one or more of the following 30
requirements for a hearing: 31
(a) The petitioner has demonstrated positive, engaged, and 32
productive behavior while in the custody of the department that 33
indicates substantial rehabilitation; or 34
(b) The petitioner has otherwise demonstrated a minimal risk of 35
reoffense, which may include, but is not limited to, a demonstration 36
of medical frailty. 37
(3) Upon request by the petitioner or the petitioner's counsel, 38
the department shall assist the petitioner or the petitioner's 39
p. 3 SB 5269
counsel in compiling the petitioner's disciplinary record and record 1
of rehabilitation at no cost to the petitioner. 2
(4) The court may decline to accept a petition that does not meet 3
one or more of the eligibility criteria pursuant to subsection (1) of 4
this section. If the court accepts the petition and determines by a 5
preponderance of the evidence that the petitioner meets one or more 6
of the criteria under subsection (1) of this section, the court shall 7
grant a hearing to consider the petition, which must be heard within 8
120 days. The hearing may be continued for good cause upon motion by 9
the petitioner or the prosecuting attorney. 10
(5)(a) At the hearing to consider the petition, the petitioner is 11
entitled to de novo review of the petitioner's original sentence. The 12
court may grant the petition and modify the petitioner's original 13
sentence if the court finds that the sentence no longer advances the 14
interests of justice, provided that any new sentence imposed shall 15
not be greater than the original sentence, and provided that any new 16
sentence imposed shall be subject to the following restrictions:17
(i) If the petitioner's original sentence is an indeterminate 18
sentence imposed under RCW 9.94A.507, the court may modify the 19
minimum term of the sentence but may not modify the maximum term of 20
the sentence or order the petitioner's release from custody;21
(ii) If the petitioner's original sentence includes a mandatory 22
minimum term imposed pursuant to RCW 9.94A.540, the court may not 23
modify the sentence below the mandatory minimum term required by law; 24
and 25
(iii) The soonest allowable release date from total confinement 26
for any petitioner resentenced pursuant to this section may be no 27
sooner than six months after the date of the hearing to consider the 28
petition. 29
(b) In addition to the mitigating factors provided under RCW 30
9.94A.535(1), the court may consider the following nonexhaustive list 31
of factors when determining whether to modify the petitioner's 32
sentence: 33
(i) The petitioner's disciplinary record and record of 34
rehabilitation while incarcerated; 35
(ii) Evidence that reflects whether age, time served, and 36
diminished physical condition, if any, have reduced the petitioner's 37
risk for future recidivism; 38
(iii) Evidence regarding the petitioner's level of culpability 39
for the offense; 40
p. 4 SB 5269
(iv) Evidence that reflects changed circumstances since imposing 1
the petitioner's original sentence such that the sentence no longer 2
serves the interests of justice; 3
(v) Demonstration of an extraordinary adverse impact of the 4
petitioner's release on the victim or survivors of the victim of the 5
crime for which the petitioner is presently incarcerated, with 6
special consideration given to the impact of release on any victims 7
of sex offenses or domestic violence offenses committed by the 8
petitioner against an intimate partner. 9
(6) When modifying a sentence pursuant to this section:10
(a) The court may impose an exceptional sentence below the 11
standard range based on evidence of significant rehabilitation since 12
the offense or any other applicable factors; and 13
(b) If the petitioner's original sentence included one or more 14
mandatory enhancements that were imposed under RCW 9.94A.533, the 15
court may impose a sentence below the mandatory minimum enhancement 16
term. 17
(7) If the court denies a petition filed pursuant to this section 18
and declines to set a hearing, or grants a hearing but declines to 19
modify the petitioner's sentence at the hearing, the petitioner may, 20
upon a showing of a change in circumstances, file a new petition no 21
earlier than three years after the date the court denied the previous 22
petition or declined to modify the petitioner's sentence, unless the 23
court authorizes the petitioner to file a new petition at an earlier 24
date. If the court denies the petition or declines to modify the 25
petitioner's sentence, the court shall state the basis for its 26
decision on the record and provide an explanation for its decision in 27
a written order. The petitioner may appeal the denial of a hearing or 28
an order entered pursuant to a resentencing hearing, provided, 29
however, that denying a petition filed pursuant to this section shall 30
not reopen the petitioner's conviction or sentence to any other 31
challenges that would otherwise be barred. 32
(8)(a) The prosecuting attorney shall make reasonable efforts to 33
notify victims and survivors of victims of any hearing on a petition 34
for modification of sentence filed pursuant to this section, 35
including by providing the date of such hearing. 36
(b) For purposes of (a) of this subsection, the prosecuting 37
attorney shall make reasonable efforts to notify victims and 38
survivors of victims of any offense for which the petitioner is 39
seeking a modification of sentence, and victims of any sex offense or 40
p. 5 SB 5269
domestic violence offense committed against an intimate partner 1
victim for which the petitioner was previously convicted.2
(9)(a) The office of crime victims advocacy shall create a 3
flexible fund to serve victims and survivors of victims impacted by 4
this act. The office may contract for administration of this fund. 5
The flexible fund may be used for purposes including, but not limited 6
to: 7
(i) Relocation assistance related to a change in safety planning 8
associated with the petitioner's resentencing; 9
(ii) Traveling to and from court for resentencing hearings; and10
(iii) Out-of-pocket expenses for psychotherapy associated with 11
the committed offense or resentencing. 12
(b) The office of crime victims advocacy shall contract with 13
prosecuting attorney's offices to offer victim advocacy services for 14
victims impacted by this act. Such victim advocacy services must 15
include: 16
(i) Legal advocacy to understand the resentencing process and how 17
a victim can exercise their rights; 18
(ii) Safety planning; 19
(iii) Options to participate in a restorative justice program 20
with the petitioner; and 21
(iv) Case management to address needs that may arise as a result 22
of resentencing. 23
(c) The office of crime victims advocacy may contract with an 24
entity with expertise in victim services to provide training for 25
victim advocates embedded within prosecutor's offices regarding 26
safety planning and other case management services that victims 27
impacted by this act may require. 28
(10) The court shall provide an opportunity for victims and 29
survivors of victims of any crimes for which the petitioner has been 30
convicted to present a statement personally or by representation at 31
the hearing. The prosecuting attorney and the court shall comply with 32
the requirements set forth in chapter 7.69 RCW. 33
(11) The court shall not permit any person to waive the right to 34
petition pursuant to this section. Any agreement to waive the right 35
to petition pursuant to this section shall be void.36
(12) The time limit for collateral attacks established under RCW 37
10.73.090 does not apply to any petition filed pursuant to this 38
section. 39
p. 6 SB 5269
(13) Any incarcerated individual who is eligible to file a 1
petition pursuant to this section and is unable to afford counsel 2
shall be entitled to have counsel appointed pursuant to section 4 of 3
this act. Counsel shall be appointed at no cost to the individual, to 4
represent the individual for the petition and proceedings under this 5
section, unless the individual expressly waives the right to counsel 6
after being fully advised of this right by the court.7
(14) Any person who files a pro se petition and subsequently 8
retains or is appointed counsel shall be entitled to amend such 9
petition at least once as of right with the assistance of counsel. 10
Subsequent amendments may be permitted by leave of court.11
(15) The department shall provide written notice of this section 12
to any incarcerated individual sentenced to a term of confinement of 13
more than 10 years, and the applicable sentencing court, prosecuting 14
attorney, and public defense agency for the judicial district in 15
which the individual was sentenced, within the following time frames:16
(a) For any incarcerated individual serving an applicable 17
sentence for a felony offense committed at 18 years of age or older, 18
the department shall provide written notice of this section no later 19
than 180 days before the date on which the person's 10th year of 20
confinement begins; and 21
(b) For any incarcerated individual serving an applicable 22
sentence for a felony offense committed at 17 years of age or 23
younger, the department shall provide written notice of this section 24
no later than 180 days before the date on which the person's seventh 25
year of confinement begins. 26
(16) When any person granted a modified sentence pursuant to this 27
section is within six months of his or her expected release date from 28
total confinement, the department must prepare and make available an 29
individual reentry plan under chapter 72.09 RCW and the resources 30
necessary for the person to complete the plan. 31
(17) A person may not petition for a modification of sentence 32
pursuant to this section if the person's original sentence was 33
imposed under RCW 9.94A.570 or 10.95.030. 34
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. A new section is added to chapter 2.70 RCW 35
to read as follows: 36
Within available resources, the office of public defense shall 37
provide representation for persons who are eligible to file a 38
petition pursuant to section 3 of this act. The office will 39
p. 7 SB 5269
prioritize representation based on the eligibility criteria and 1
timelines established in section 3(1) of this act. 2
Sec. 5. RCW 10.73.100 and 2024 c 118 s 8 are each amended to 3
read as follows: 4
The time limit specified in RCW 10.73.090 does not apply to a 5
petition or motion that is based solely on one or more of the 6
following grounds: 7
(1) Newly discovered evidence, if the defendant acted with 8
reasonable diligence in discovering the evidence and filing the 9
petition or motion; 10
(2) The statute that the defendant was convicted of violating was 11
unconstitutional on its face or as applied to the defendant's 12
conduct; 13
(3) The conviction was barred by double jeopardy under Amendment 14
V of the United States Constitution or Article I, section 9 of the 15
state Constitution; 16
(4) The defendant pleaded not guilty and the evidence introduced 17
at trial was insufficient to support the conviction;18
(5) The sentence imposed was in excess of the court's 19
jurisdiction; 20
(6) A petition for a modification of sentence pursuant to section 21
3 of this act;22
(7) A motion for a modification of conditions of community 23
custody pursuant to RCW 9.94A.703 and 9.94A.709; or24
(((7))) (8) There has been a significant change in the law, 25
whether substantive or procedural, which is material to the 26
conviction, sentence, or other order entered in a criminal or civil 27
proceeding instituted by the state or local government, and either 28
the legislature has expressly provided that the change in the law is 29
to be applied retroactively, or a court, in interpreting a change in 30
the law that lacks express legislative intent regarding retroactive 31
application, determines that sufficient reasons exist to require 32
retroactive application of the changed legal standard.33
Sec. 6. RCW 9.94A.535 and 2019 c 219 s 1 are each amended to 34
read as follows: 35
The court may impose a sentence outside the standard sentence 36
range for an offense if it finds, considering the purpose of this 37
chapter, that there are substantial and compelling reasons justifying 38
p. 8 SB 5269
an exceptional sentence. Facts supporting aggravated sentences, other 1
than the fact of a prior conviction, shall be determined pursuant to 2
the provisions of RCW 9.94A.537. 3
Whenever a sentence outside the standard sentence range is 4
imposed, the court shall set forth the reasons for its decision in 5
written findings of fact and conclusions of law. A sentence outside 6
the standard sentence range shall be a determinate sentence.7
If the sentencing court finds that an exceptional sentence 8
outside the standard sentence range should be imposed, the sentence 9
is subject to review only as provided for in RCW 9.94A.585(4).10
A departure from the standards in RCW 9.94A.589 (1) and (2) 11
governing whether sentences are to be served consecutively or 12
concurrently is an exceptional sentence subject to the limitations in 13
this section, and may be appealed by the offender or the state as set 14
forth in RCW 9.94A.585 (2) through (6). 15
(1) Mitigating Circumstances - Court to Consider16
The court may impose an exceptional sentence below the standard 17
range if it finds that mitigating circumstances are established by a 18
preponderance of the evidence. The following are illustrative only 19
and are not intended to be exclusive reasons for exceptional 20
sentences. 21
(a) To a significant degree, the victim was an initiator, willing 22
participant, aggressor, or provoker of the incident.23
(b) Before detection, the defendant compensated, or made a good 24
faith effort to compensate, the victim of the criminal conduct for 25
any damage or injury sustained. 26
(c) The defendant committed the crime under duress, coercion, 27
threat, or compulsion insufficient to constitute a complete defense 28
but which significantly affected his or her conduct.29
(d) The defendant, with no apparent predisposition to do so, was 30
induced by others to participate in the crime. 31
(e) The defendant's capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of 32
his or her conduct, or to conform his or her conduct to the 33
requirements of the law, was significantly impaired. Voluntary use of 34
drugs or alcohol is excluded. 35
(f) The offense was principally accomplished by another person 36
and the defendant manifested extreme caution or sincere concern for 37
the safety or well-being of the victim. 38
p. 9 SB 5269
(g) The operation of the multiple offense policy of RCW 9.94A.589 1
results in a presumptive sentence that is clearly excessive in light 2
of the purpose of this chapter, as expressed in RCW 9.94A.010.3
(h) The defendant or the defendant's children suffered a 4
continuing pattern of physical or sexual abuse by the victim of the 5
offense and the offense is a response to that abuse.6
(i) The defendant was making a good faith effort to obtain or 7
provide medical assistance for someone who is experiencing a drug-8
related overdose. 9
(j) The current offense involved domestic violence, as defined in 10
RCW 10.99.020, and the defendant suffered a continuing pattern of 11
coercion, control, or abuse by the victim of the offense and the 12
offense is a response to that coercion, control, or abuse.13
(k) The defendant was convicted of vehicular homicide, by the 14
operation of a vehicle in a reckless manner and has committed no 15
other previous serious traffic offenses as defined in RCW 9.94A.030, 16
and the sentence is clearly excessive in light of the purpose of this 17
chapter, as expressed in RCW 9.94A.010. 18
(l) The defendant petitions the court for modification of 19
sentence pursuant to section 3 of this act, and the court considers 20
the nonexhaustive list of additional factors provided under section 21
3(5)(b) of this act at a hearing on the petition.22
(2) Aggravating Circumstances - Considered and Imposed by the 23
Court 24
The trial court may impose an aggravated exceptional sentence 25
without a finding of fact by a jury under the following 26
circumstances: 27
(a) The defendant and the state both stipulate that justice is 28
best served by the imposition of an exceptional sentence outside the 29
standard range, and the court finds the exceptional sentence to be 30
consistent with and in furtherance of the interests of justice and 31
the purposes of the sentencing reform act. 32
(b) The defendant's prior unscored misdemeanor or prior unscored 33
foreign criminal history results in a presumptive sentence that is 34
clearly too lenient in light of the purpose of this chapter, as 35
expressed in RCW 9.94A.010. 36
(c) The defendant has committed multiple current offenses and the 37
defendant's high offender score results in some of the current 38
offenses going unpunished. 39
p. 10 SB 5269
(d) The failure to consider the defendant's prior criminal 1
history which was omitted from the offender score calculation 2
pursuant to RCW 9.94A.525 results in a presumptive sentence that is 3
clearly too lenient. 4
(3) Aggravating Circumstances - Considered by a Jury - Imposed by 5
the Court 6
Except for circumstances listed in subsection (2) of this 7
section, the following circumstances are an exclusive list of factors 8
that can support a sentence above the standard range. Such facts 9
should be determined by procedures specified in RCW 9.94A.537.10
(a) The defendant's conduct during the commission of the current 11
offense manifested deliberate cruelty to the victim.12
(b) The defendant knew or should have known that the victim of 13
the current offense was particularly vulnerable or incapable of 14
resistance. 15
(c) The current offense was a violent offense, and the defendant 16
knew that the victim of the current offense was pregnant.17
(d) The current offense was a major economic offense or series of 18
offenses, so identified by a consideration of any of the following 19
factors: 20
(i) The current offense involved multiple victims or multiple 21
incidents per victim; 22
(ii) The current offense involved attempted or actual monetary 23
loss substantially greater than typical for the offense;24
(iii) The current offense involved a high degree of 25
sophistication or planning or occurred over a lengthy period of time; 26
or 27
(iv) The defendant used his or her position of trust, confidence, 28
or fiduciary responsibility to facilitate the commission of the 29
current offense. 30
(e) The current offense was a major violation of the Uniform 31
Controlled Substances Act, chapter 69.50 RCW (VUCSA), related to 32
trafficking in controlled substances, which was more onerous than the 33
typical offense of its statutory definition: The presence of ANY of 34
the following may identify a current offense as a major VUCSA:35
(i) The current offense involved at least three separate 36
transactions in which controlled substances were sold, transferred, 37
or possessed with intent to do so; 38
p. 11 SB 5269
(ii) The current offense involved an attempted or actual sale or 1
transfer of controlled substances in quantities substantially larger 2
than for personal use; 3
(iii) The current offense involved the manufacture of controlled 4
substances for use by other parties; 5
(iv) The circumstances of the current offense reveal the offender 6
to have occupied a high position in the drug distribution hierarchy;7
(v) The current offense involved a high degree of sophistication 8
or planning, occurred over a lengthy period of time, or involved a 9
broad geographic area of disbursement; or 10
(vi) The offender used his or her position or status to 11
facilitate the commission of the current offense, including positions 12
of trust, confidence or fiduciary responsibility (e.g., pharmacist, 13
physician, or other medical professional). 14
(f) The current offense included a finding of sexual motivation 15
pursuant to RCW 9.94A.835. 16
(g) The offense was part of an ongoing pattern of sexual abuse of 17
the same victim under the age of ((eighteen)) 18 years manifested by 18
multiple incidents over a prolonged period of time.19
(h) The current offense involved domestic violence, as defined in 20
RCW 10.99.020, or stalking, as defined in RCW 9A.46.110, and one or 21
more of the following was present: 22
(i) The offense was part of an ongoing pattern of psychological, 23
physical, or sexual abuse of a victim or multiple victims manifested 24
by multiple incidents over a prolonged period of time;25
(ii) The offense occurred within sight or sound of the victim's 26
or the offender's minor children under the age of eighteen years; or27
(iii) The offender's conduct during the commission of the current 28
offense manifested deliberate cruelty or intimidation of the victim.29
(i) The offense resulted in the pregnancy of a child victim of 30
rape. 31
(j) The defendant knew that the victim of the current offense was 32
a youth who was not residing with a legal custodian and the defendant 33
established or promoted the relationship for the primary purpose of 34
victimization. 35
(k) The offense was committed with the intent to obstruct or 36
impair human or animal health care or agricultural or forestry 37
research or commercial production. 38
p. 12 SB 5269
(l) The current offense is trafficking in the first degree or 1
trafficking in the second degree and any victim was a minor at the 2
time of the offense. 3
(m) The offense involved a high degree of sophistication or 4
planning. 5
(n) The defendant used his or her position of trust, confidence, 6
or fiduciary responsibility to facilitate the commission of the 7
current offense. 8
(o) The defendant committed a current sex offense, has a history 9
of sex offenses, and is not amenable to treatment.10
(p) The offense involved an invasion of the victim's privacy.11
(q) The defendant demonstrated or displayed an egregious lack of 12
remorse. 13
(r) The offense involved a destructive and foreseeable impact on 14
persons other than the victim. 15
(s) The defendant committed the offense to obtain or maintain his 16
or her membership or to advance his or her position in the hierarchy 17
of an organization, association, or identifiable group.18
(t) The defendant committed the current offense shortly after 19
being released from incarceration. 20
(u) The current offense is a burglary and the victim of the 21
burglary was present in the building or residence when the crime was 22
committed. 23
(v) The offense was committed against a law enforcement officer 24
who was performing his or her official duties at the time of the 25
offense, the offender knew that the victim was a law enforcement 26
officer, and the victim's status as a law enforcement officer is not 27
an element of the offense. 28
(w) The defendant committed the offense against a victim who was 29
acting as a good samaritan. 30
(x) The defendant committed the offense against a public official 31
or officer of the court in retaliation of the public official's 32
performance of his or her duty to the criminal justice system.33
(y) The victim's injuries substantially exceed the level of 34
bodily harm necessary to satisfy the elements of the offense. This 35
aggravator is not an exception to RCW 9.94A.530(2).36
(z)(i)(A) The current offense is theft in the first degree, theft 37
in the second degree, possession of stolen property in the first 38
degree, or possession of stolen property in the second degree; (B) 39
the stolen property involved is metal property; and (C) the property 40
p. 13 SB 5269
damage to the victim caused in the course of the theft of metal 1
property is more than three times the value of the stolen metal 2
property, or the theft of the metal property creates a public hazard.3
(ii) For purposes of this subsection, "metal property" means 4
commercial metal property, private metal property, or nonferrous 5
metal property, as defined in RCW 19.290.010. 6
(aa) The defendant committed the offense with the intent to 7
directly or indirectly cause any benefit, aggrandizement, gain, 8
profit, or other advantage to or for a criminal street gang as 9
defined in RCW 9.94A.030, its reputation, influence, or membership.10
(bb) The current offense involved paying to view, over the 11
internet in violation of RCW 9.68A.075, depictions of a minor engaged 12
in an act of sexually explicit conduct as defined in RCW 13
9.68A.011(((4)))(7) (a) through (g). 14
(cc) The offense was intentionally committed because the 15
defendant perceived the victim to be homeless, as defined in RCW 16
9.94A.030. 17
(dd) The current offense involved a felony crime against persons, 18
except for assault in the third degree pursuant to RCW 19
9A.36.031(1)(k), that occurs in a courtroom, jury room, judge's 20
chamber, or any waiting area or corridor immediately adjacent to a 21
courtroom, jury room, or judge's chamber. This subsection shall apply 22
only: (i) During the times when a courtroom, jury room, or judge's 23
chamber is being used for judicial purposes during court proceedings; 24
and (ii) if signage was posted in compliance with RCW 2.28.200 at the 25
time of the offense. 26
(ee) During the commission of the current offense, the defendant 27
was driving in the opposite direction of the normal flow of traffic 28
on a multiple lane highway, as defined by RCW 46.04.350, with a 29
posted speed limit of forty-five miles per hour or greater.30
(ff) The current offense involved the assault of a utility 31
employee of any publicly or privately owned utility company or 32
agency, who is at the time of the act engaged in official duties, 33
including: (i) The maintenance or repair of utility poles, lines, 34
conduits, pipes, or other infrastructure; or (ii) connecting, 35
disconnecting, or recording utility meters. 36
--- END ---
p. 14 SB 5269