Back to Washington

SB5347 • 2026

Organized retail theft

Concerning organized retail theft.

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Senator Fortunato
Last action
2026-01-12
Official status
S Law & Justice
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Organized retail theft

Organized retail theft

What This Bill Does

  • Organized retail theft

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-01-12 Senate

    By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

Official Summary Text

Organized retail theft

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
AN ACT Relating to organized retail theft; and amending RCW 1
9A.56.350. 2
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:3
Sec. 1. RCW 9A.56.350 and 2017 c 329 s 1 are each amended to 4
read as follows: 5
(1) A person is guilty of organized retail theft if he or she:6
(a) Commits theft of property with a value of at least seven 7
hundred fifty dollars from a mercantile establishment with an 8
accomplice; 9
(b) Possesses stolen property, as defined in RCW 9A.56.140, with 10
a value of at least seven hundred fifty dollars from a mercantile 11
establishment with an accomplice; 12
(c) Commits theft of property with a cumulative value of at least 13
seven hundred fifty dollars from one or more mercantile 14
establishments within a period of up to ((one hundred eighty )) 365 15
days; or 16
(d) Commits theft of property with a cumulative value of at least 17
seven hundred fifty dollars from a mercantile establishment with no 18
less than ((six)) two accomplices and makes or sends at least one 19
electronic communication seeking participation in the theft in the 20
course of planning or commission of the theft. For the purposes of 21
S-0212.1
SENATE BILL 5347
State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session
By Senator Fortunato
p. 1 SB 5347
this subsection, "electronic communication" has the same meaning as 1
defined in RCW ((9.61.260(5))) 9A.90.120(8). 2
(2) A person is guilty of organized retail theft in the first 3
degree if the property stolen or possessed has a value of five 4
thousand dollars or more. Organized retail theft in the first degree 5
is a class B felony. 6
(3) A person is guilty of organized retail theft in the second 7
degree if the property stolen or possessed has a value of at least 8
seven hundred fifty dollars, but less than five thousand dollars. 9
Organized retail theft in the second degree is a class C felony.10
(4) For purposes of this section, a series of thefts committed by 11
the same person from one or more mercantile establishments over a 12
period of ((one hundred eighty )) 365 days ((may)) shall, if 13
practicable, be aggregated in one count and the sum of the value of 14
all the property shall be the value considered in determining the 15
degree of the organized retail theft involved. Thefts committed by 16
the same person in different counties that have been aggregated in 17
one county may be prosecuted in any county in which any one of the 18
thefts occurred. For purposes of subsection (1)(d) of this section, 19
thefts committed by the principal and accomplices ((may)) shall, if 20
practicable, be aggregated into one count and the value of all the 21
property shall be the value considered in determining the degree of 22
organized retail theft involved. 23
(5) The mercantile establishment or establishments whose property 24
is alleged to have been stolen may request that the charge be 25
aggregated with other thefts of property about which the mercantile 26
establishment or establishments is aware. In the event a request to 27
aggregate the prosecution is declined, the mercantile establishment 28
or establishments shall be promptly advised by the prosecuting 29
jurisdiction making the decision to decline aggregating the 30
prosecution of the decision and the reasons for such decision.31
--- END ---
p. 2 SB 5347