Back to West Virginia

HB4097 • 2026

To create the Protection of Shared Physical and Digital Property from Warrantless Searches Act

To create the Protection of Shared Physical and Digital Property from Warrantless Searches Act

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Horst, Martin , Brooks , Dean , Ward , Mallow , Hillenbrand , Crouse , Mazzocchi
Last action
2026-01-14
Official status
H To House Judiciary 01/14/26
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The plain English breakdown is still being put together. The official documents below are already here.

Bill History

  1. 2026-01-14 H

    To House Judiciary

  2. 2026-01-14 H

    Introduced in House

  3. 2026-01-14 H

    To Judiciary

  4. 2026-01-14 H

    Filed for introduction

Official Summary Text

To create the Protection of Shared Physical and Digital Property from Warrantless Searches Act

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HB 4097 Text

skip navigation

SENATE

PRESIDENT

SENATORS

COMMITTEES

VIDEO/AUDIO

DISTRICT MAPS

SENATE CLERK

SENATE RULES

HOUSE

SPEAKER

DELEGATES

COMMITTEES

VIDEO/AUDIO

DISTRICT MAPS

HOUSE CLERK

HOUSE RULES

HOUSE STAFF

JOINT

INTERIM COMMITTEES

LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATOR

LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DIVISION

PUBLIC INFORMATION

LEGISLATIVE AUTOMATED SYSTEMS DIVISION

LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR'S OFFICE

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION & RESEARCH DIVISION

POST AUDIT DIVISION

BUDGET DIVISION

REGULATORY AND FISCAL AFFAIRS DIVISION

CLAIMS COMMISSION

CRIME VICTIMS

RULE-MAKING REVIEW

SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS

JUDICIAL COMP. COMMISSION

JOINT RULES

STAFF INFO

BILL STATUS

BILL STATUS

BILL TRACKING

STATE LAW

WEST VIRGINIA CODE

ACTS OF THE LEGISLATURE

CODE OF 1931

WV CONSTITUTION

US CONSTITUTION

REPORTS

AGENCY REPORTS

AGENCY GRANT AWARDS

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

POST AUDITS

EDUCATIONAL

CITIZEN’S GUIDE

INTERNSHIP PROGRAM

PAGE PROGRAM

PUBLICATIONS

PHOTO GALLERY

CAPITOL HISTORY

HOW A BILL BECOMES LAW

CONTACT

SENATE ROSTER

HOUSE ROSTER

PUBLIC INFO.

NEWS RELEASES

HELPFUL LINKS

Introduced Version

House Bill 4097 History

|
Email

Key:
Green
= existing Code.
Red
= new code to be enacted

WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE
2026
REGULAR SESSION
Introduced
House Bill 4097
By Delegates Horst, Masters, Brooks, Dean, B. Ward. Mallow, Hillenbrand, Crouse, and Mazzocchi
[Introduced January 14, 2026; referred to the Committee on the Judiciary]
A BILL to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding a new article, designated §62-1H-1, §62-1H-2, §62-1H-3, §62-1H-4, §62-1H-5, and §62-1H-6, all relating to establishing the
Protection of Shared Physical and Digital Property from Warrantless Searches Act; providing for legislative findings; providing for definitions;
creating conditions for government to search or seize physical or digital property from a third party; defining illegal searches and seizures, and providing for an effective date.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:

ARTICLE 1H. Protection of Shared Physical and Digital Property from Warrantless Searches Act.

§62-1H-1. Short title.

This article
may be cited as "The Protection of Shared Physical and Digital Property from Warrantless Searches Act."

§62-1H-2. Legislative findings.

(a) The people of this state have the right to be secure in their persons and property.
(b) A person’s right to be secure in property extends to all forms of property, including physical and digital in nature. The person has a property interest and a reasonable expectation of privacy in the person’s physical and digital property.
(c) A person who holds a property interest or reasonable expectation of privacy in physical or digital property, including information, may share that property by contract or other legal means with others for the purpose of obtaining goods and services without impairing or abridging the person’s right to be secure in that property.
(d) Misguided judicial decisions have established a rule called the "Third Party Doctrine." It states a person lacks any constitutional protections as to information the person shares with another party. This exception applies to all information shared even when the receiving party is contractually obligated to keep the shared information private.
(e) The "Third Party Doctrine" is inconsistent with the right to be secure in property. It forces a person to sacrifice constitutional protection to obtain goods and services.
(f) The rapid technological advancement that has facilitated Internet access, communications and commerce is a welcomed development. But it has exacerbated the impact of the "Third Party Doctrine." Virtually all such access, communications and commerce depend on the sharing of a person’s information with third parties.
(g) This article protects a resident from warrantless searches of information shared with third parties when obtaining goods and services by requiring government officials to obtain a person’s consent or a judicial warrant based on probable cause prior to accessing that person’s shared information.

§62-1H-3. Definitions.

(a) "Digital property" means:
(1) Information that a person creates that exists in digital form, either online or on an electronic storage device. It includes information necessary to access the digital property.
(2) Information that a person shares with a third party in connection to the provision of goods or services to that person and is recorded in digital form. This includes all digital records containing such information.
(3) This definition does not include information a person voluntarily shares with the public or a third party with the understanding that the third party will share that information with the public.
(b) "Government agent" means any official who is employed or contracted by any level of government in this state.
(c) "Physical property" means:
(1) All real and personal property that a person owns or possesses.
(2) All real and personal property that a person shares with a third party in connection to the provision of goods or services to that person.
(3) Information a person shares with a third party in connection to the provision of goods or services to that person that is recorded in physical form, including all physical records containing such information.
(4) This definition does not include information a person voluntarily shares with the public or a third party with the understanding that the third party will share that information with the public.
(5) "Probable cause" means the presence of facts and circumstances within the government agent’s knowledge that would warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has been or is being committed.
(6) "Search or seizure warrant" means a warrant that is supported by individualized probable cause and authorized by a magistrate or judge.
(7) "Third party" means a party, different from the person or government, who maintains physical or digital property about the person as part of providing that person goods or services.

§62-1H-4. Conditions for government to search or seize physical or digital property from a third party.

(a) No government agent shall search or seize physical or digital property of any person that is held by a third party without first obtaining a search or seizure warrant based on probable cause, except:
(1) After receiving the permission of the property owner; or
(2) To respond to an imminent threat to a person’s life, safety, or property, or a similar exigent circumstance.
(b) Unless searching or seizing property under an exception in subsection (a), a government agent must, upon execution of a search or seizure warrant, provide notice and a copy of said warrant authorizing the search or seizure to the property owner as well as any third party from whom the property has been searched or seized.
(c) A court, upon a showing by the government that providing the search or seizure warrant to the property owner would impede or otherwise jeopardize an ongoing investigation, may delay the giving of such notice for a reasonable period not to exceed 30 days after the date of its execution, or on a later date certain if the facts of the case justify a longer period of delay.
(d) A person aggrieved by a search or seizure of their physical or digital property possessed by a third party may challenge the search or seizure as if the property had been searched or seized directly from the person.

§62-1H-5. Illegal searches and seizures.

(a) Any evidence obtained pursuant to a search or seizure conducted in violation of this article is inadmissible in any administrative, civil, or criminal proceeding.
(b) If a government agent searches or seizes physical or digital property in violation of this article, a person who believes her rights have been violated may pursue an action under the West Virginia Human Rights Act.
(c) In an action under subsection (b), a prevailing plaintiff may recover declaratory relief, injunctive relief, compensatory damages, nominal damages, and attorney’s fees.

§62-1H-6. Effective date.

This article shall take effect on July 31, 2026.

NOTE: The purpose of this bill is to establish the Protection of Shared Physical and Digital Property from Warrantless Searches Act. The bill provides for legislative findings. The bill provides for definitions. The bill creates conditions for government to search or seize physical or digital property from a third party. The bill defines illegal searches and seizures. Finally, the bill provides for an effective date
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.

Bill Status
|

Bill Tracking
|

Legacy WV Code
|

Bulletin Board
|

District Maps
|

Senate Roster
|

House Roster
|

Live
|

Blog
|

Jobs
|

Links
|

Home

This Web site is maintained by the
West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
|
Terms of Use
|

Webmaster
| © 2026 West Virginia Legislature **

Print On Demand

Name:

Email:

Phone: