Back to Wisconsin

AB1070 • 2025

the restrictiveness of shoreland zoning ordinances

the restrictiveness of shoreland zoning ordinances

Housing Land
Active

The official status still shows this bill as active or still awaiting another formal step.

Sponsor
Representatives Miresse, Stroud, Emerson and Stubbs, cosponsored by Senator Smith
Last action
2026-04-09
Official status
A - Housing and Real Estate
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

the restrictiveness of shoreland zoning ordinances

the restrictiveness of shoreland zoning ordinances Status: A - Housing and Real Estate

What This Bill Does

  • the restrictiveness of shoreland zoning ordinances Status: A - Housing and Real Estate

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-09 Asm.

    Fiscal estimate received

  2. 2026-03-23 Asm.

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  3. 2026-02-26 Asm.

    Introduced by Representatives Miresse , Stroud , Emerson and Stubbs ; cosponsored by Senator Smith

  4. 2026-02-26 Asm.

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate

Official Summary Text

the restrictiveness of shoreland zoning ordinances
Status: A - Housing and Real Estate

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Wisconsin Legislature: AB1070: Bill Text

Skip navigation

Home

Documents

Senate

Assembly

Committees

Service Agencies

Docs

Options

Help

2025 Biennium

Statutes

Admin. Rules

Indices

Miscellaneous

Archives

Home

Bill, Rule, and Appointment Histories

Senators

Representatives

Committees

Text of Introduced Proposals

Amendment Text

Acts

Veto Messages

Enrolled Bills

Votes

Assembly and Senate Floor Calendars

Schedule of Committee Activities

Assembly and Senate Journals

Committee Records (ROCPs)

Legislative Rules

All Session-Related Documents

Subject Index to Acts

Subject Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Journals

Author Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Clearinghouse Rules

Miscellaneous Budget Documents

Executive Orders

Rulings of the Chair

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules

Opinions of the Attorney General

Town Law Forms

Law

Districts

Session

Drafting Files

Feeds

Preferences

Show tree

Hide tree

Feedback

Help

Home

Senate Home

Senators

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Civics Education

Human Resources
Assembly Home

Representatives

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Human Resources
Schedule

Joint

Senate

Assembly

Study
Legislative Audit Bureau

Legislative Council

Legislative Fiscal Bureau

Legislative Human Resources Office

Legislative Reference Bureau

Legislative Technology Services Bureau

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
AB1070: Bill Text

Up

Up

2025 - 2026 LEGISLATURE
LRB-6371/1
EHS:klm
2025 ASSEMBLY BILL 1070
February 26, 2026 - Introduced by Representatives
Miresse
,
Stroud
,
Emerson
and
Stubbs
, cosponsored by Senator
Smith
. Referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate.
AB1070,1,5
1
An Act

to repeal
59.692 (1d) and 59.692 (2m);
to amend
59.692 (1k) (a)
2
(intro.), 59.692 (1k) (a) 2. (intro.), 59.692 (1k) (a) 2m., 59.692 (1k) (a) 4., 59.692
3
(1k) (am) (intro.), 59.692 (4) (b), 59.692 (5m), 61.353 (3) (intro.) and 62.233 (3)
4
(intro.);
to create
59.692 (1k) (ag) of the statutes;
relating to:
the
5
restrictiveness of shoreland zoning ordinances.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes various changes to limits on the restrictiveness of shoreland zoning ordinances.
Current law requires a county to enact shoreland zoning ordinances for all shorelands in its unincorporated area and requires those ordinances to meet shoreland zoning standards established by the Department of Natural Resources by rule. Current law generally defines a shoreland to be an area within a specified distance from the edge of a navigable water.
This bill eliminates a provision under current law that prohibits a county shoreland zoning ordinance from regulating a matter more restrictively than the matter is regulated by a shoreland zoning standard promulgated by DNR. The bill also eliminates a provision under current law that prohibits a county shoreland zoning ordinance from regulating the construction of a structure on a substandard lot in a manner that is more restrictive than the DNR shoreland zoning standards for substandard lots.
Current law provides that a county board of adjustment has authority to decide upon variances and appeals from county decisions regarding shorelands within the county. The bill eliminates a current law exception that prohibits DNR from appealing a county decision to grant or deny a variance relating to shoreland zoning. Under current law, DNR may only, upon the request of a county board of adjustment, issue an opinion on whether a variance should be granted or denied.
Current law prohibits DNR and counties from impairing the interest of a landowner in shoreland property by establishing a shoreland zoning standard or enacting or enforcing a shoreland zoning ordinance that does any of a number of specified things. The bill removes the language prohibiting the impairment of the interest of a landowner in shoreland property, but leaves the prohibition on establishing a shoreland zoning standard or enacting or enforcing a shoreland zoning ordinance.
DNR and counties may not, under current law, use a shoreland zoning standard or ordinance to require any approval or impose any fee or mitigation requirement for, or otherwise prohibit or regulate, any of the following:
1. The maintenance, repair, replacement, restoration, rebuilding, or remodeling of all or any part of certain nonconforming structures or structures legally within the shoreland setback area if the activity does not expand the footprint of the structure.
2. The vertical expansion of certain nonconforming structures or structures legally within the shoreland setback area unless the expansion would extend more than 35 feet above grade level.
The bill permits DNR and counties to impose a fee with respect to these activities.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
AB1070,1
1
Section
1
.
59.692 (1d) of the statutes is repealed.
AB1070,2
2
Section
2
.
59.692 (1k) (a) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB1070,3,2
3
59.692
(1k)
(a) (intro.) The department may not
impair the interest of a
4
landowner in shoreland property by establishing

establish
a shoreland zoning
5
standard, and a county may not
impair the interest of a landowner in shoreland
1
property by enacting or enforcing

enact or enforce
a shoreland zoning ordinance,
2
that does any of the following:
AB1070,3
3
Section
3
.
59.692 (1k) (a) 2. (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB1070,3,8
4
59.692
(1k)
(a) 2. (intro.) Except as provided in
par.

pars. (ag) and
(b), requires
5
any approval or imposes any
fee or
mitigation requirement for, or otherwise
6
prohibits or regulates, the maintenance, repair, replacement, restoration,
7
rebuilding, or remodeling of all or any part of any of the following if the activity does
8
not expand the footprint of the structure:
AB1070,4
9
Section
4
.
59.692 (1k) (a) 2m. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB1070,3,15
10
59.692
(1k)
(a) 2m. Except as provided in pars.
(ag),
(b)
,
and (bm), requires
11
any approval or imposes any
fee or
mitigation requirement for, or otherwise
12
prohibits or regulates, the maintenance, repair, replacement, restoration,
13
rebuilding, or remodeling of all or any part of a structure listed under sub. (1n) (d)
14
that was legally constructed wholly or partially within the shoreland setback area if
15
the activity does not expand the footprint of the existing structure.
AB1070,5
16
Section
5
.
59.692 (1k) (a) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB1070,3,22
17
59.692
(1k)
(a) 4.
Requires

Except as provided in par. (ag), requires
any
18
approval or imposes any
fee or
mitigation requirement for, or otherwise prohibits or
19
regulates, the vertical expansion of a nonconforming structure or a structure of
20
which any part is legally located in the shoreland setback area by operation of a
21
variance granted before July 13, 2015, unless the vertical expansion would extend
22
more than 35 feet above grade level.
AB1070,6
23
Section
6
.
59.692 (1k) (ag) of the statutes is created to read:
AB1070,4,2
1
59.692
(1k)
(ag) The department or a county may impose a fee with respect to
2
the activities described in par. (a) 2., 2m., and 4.
AB1070,7
3
Section
7
.
59.692 (1k) (am) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB1070,4,8
4
59.692
(1k)
(am) (intro.) The department may not
impair the interest of a
5
landowner in shoreland property by establishing

establish
a shoreland zoning
6
standard, and a county may not
impair the interest of a landowner in shoreland
7
property by enacting or enforcing

enact or enforce
a shoreland zoning ordinance,
8
that establishes standards for impervious surfaces unless all of the following apply:
AB1070,8
9
Section
8
.
59.692 (2m) of the statutes is repealed.
AB1070,9
10
Section
9
.
59.692 (4) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB1070,4,16
11
59.692
(4)
(b) Variances and appeals regarding shorelands within a county
12
are for the board of adjustment for that county under s. 59.694, and the procedures
13
of that section apply.
Notwithstanding s. 59.694 (4), the department may not
14
appeal a decision of the county to grant or deny a variance under this section but
15
may, upon the request of a county board of adjustment, issue an opinion on whether
16
a variance should be granted or denied.
AB1070,10
17
Section
10
.
59.692 (5m) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB1070,4,20
18
59.692
(5m)
If a county has in effect on or after July 14, 2015, a provision in
19
an ordinance that is inconsistent with sub.
(1d),
(1f)
,

or
(1k),
or (2m),
the provision
20
does not apply and may not be enforced.
AB1070,11
21
Section
11
.
61.353 (3) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB1070,5,2
22
61.353
(3)
(intro.) A village ordinance enacted under this section shall accord
1
and be consistent with the requirements and limitations under s. 59.692
(1d),
(1f)
,

2
and (1k) and shall include at least all of the following provisions:
AB1070,12
3
Section
12
.
62.233 (3) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB1070,5,6
4
62.233
(3)
(intro.) A city ordinance enacted under this section shall accord
5
and be consistent with the requirements and limitations under s. 59.692
(1d),
(1f)
,

6
and (1k) and shall include at least all of the following provisions:
AB1070,5,7
7
(end)

Down

Down

/2025/related/proposals/ab1070

true

proposaltext

/2025/related/proposals/ab1070

proposaltext/2025/REG/AB1070

proposaltext/2025/REG/AB1070

section

true

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
AB1070: Bill Text

×

Details for

PDF view

Link
(Permanent link)

Bookmark this location

View toggle

Go to top of document

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Search in this agency

Search in this chapter group

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Cross references for section

Acts affecting this section

References to this

1970 Statutes Annotations

Appellate Court Citations

Administrative Code Index

Reference lines

Clear highlighting