Back to Wisconsin

AB258 • 2025

license eligibility and restriction extensions relating to ignition interlock devices

license eligibility and restriction extensions relating to ignition interlock devices

Did Not Pass

The latest official action shows that this bill did not move forward in that session.

Sponsor
Representatives Spiros, Kaufert, Andraca, Brooks, Dittrich, Goeben, Gundrum, Knodl, Maxey, Murphy, Mursau, O'Connor, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Snyder and Subeck, cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Pfaff, Feyen, Hutton, Larson and Tomczyk
Last action
2026-03-23
Official status
A - Tabled
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

license eligibility and restriction extensions relating to ignition interlock devices

license eligibility and restriction extensions relating to ignition interlock devices Status: A - Tabled

What This Bill Does

  • license eligibility and restriction extensions relating to ignition interlock devices Status: A - Tabled

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-23 Asm.

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. 2026-02-18 Asm.

    Laid on the table

  3. 2026-02-17 Asm.

    Made a special order of business at 1:17 PM on 2-18-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 13

  4. 2026-01-15 Asm.

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary , Ayes 8, Noes 0

  5. 2026-01-15 Asm.

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary , Ayes 8, Noes 0

  6. 2026-01-15 Asm.

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. 2026-01-14 Asm.

    Executive action taken

  8. 2026-01-07 Asm.

    Public hearing held

  9. 2026-01-07 Asm.

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Spiros

  10. 2026-01-07 Asm.

    Representative B. Jacobson added as a coauthor

  11. 2025-08-07 Asm.

    Representative J. Jacobson added as a coauthor

  12. 2025-05-19 Asm.

    Introduced by Representatives Spiros , Kaufert , Andraca , Brooks , Dittrich , Goeben , Gundrum , Knodl , Maxey , Murphy , Mursau , O'Connor , Penterman , Piwowarczyk , Snyder and Subeck ; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard , Pfaff , Feyen , Hutton , Larson and Tomczyk

  13. 2025-05-19 Asm.

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

Official Summary Text

license eligibility and restriction extensions relating to ignition interlock devices
Status: A - Tabled

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Wisconsin Legislature: AB258: Bill Text

Skip navigation

Home

Documents

Senate

Assembly

Committees

Service Agencies

Docs

Options

Help

2025 Biennium

Statutes

Admin. Rules

Indices

Miscellaneous

Archives

Home

Bill, Rule, and Appointment Histories

Senators

Representatives

Committees

Text of Introduced Proposals

Amendment Text

Acts

Veto Messages

Enrolled Bills

Votes

Assembly and Senate Floor Calendars

Schedule of Committee Activities

Assembly and Senate Journals

Committee Records (ROCPs)

Legislative Rules

All Session-Related Documents

Subject Index to Acts

Subject Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Journals

Author Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Clearinghouse Rules

Miscellaneous Budget Documents

Executive Orders

Rulings of the Chair

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules

Opinions of the Attorney General

Town Law Forms

Law

Districts

Session

Drafting Files

Feeds

Preferences

Show tree

Hide tree

Feedback

Help

Home

Senate Home

Senators

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Civics Education

Human Resources
Assembly Home

Representatives

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Human Resources
Schedule

Joint

Senate

Assembly

Study
Legislative Audit Bureau

Legislative Council

Legislative Fiscal Bureau

Legislative Human Resources Office

Legislative Reference Bureau

Legislative Technology Services Bureau

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
AB258: Bill Text

Up

Up

2025 - 2026 LEGISLATURE
LRB-2471/1
ZDW:cdc
2025 ASSEMBLY BILL 258
May 19, 2025 - Introduced by Representatives
Spiros
,
Kaufert
,
Andraca
,
Brooks
,
Dittrich
,
Goeben
,
Gundrum
,
Knodl
,
Maxey
,
Murphy
,
Mursau
,
O'Connor
,
Penterman
,
Piwowarczyk
,
Snyder
and
Subeck
, cosponsored by Senators
Wanggaard
,
Pfaff
,
Feyen
,
Hutton
,
Larson
and
Tomczyk
. Referred to Committee on Judiciary.
AB258,1,3
1
An Act

to amend
343.30 (1q) (b) 3., 343.30 (1q) (b) 4. and 343.305 (10) (b) 2.;
to
2
create
343.301 (6) of the statutes;
relating to:
license eligibility and
3
restriction extensions relating to ignition interlock devices.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, if a person is convicted of a second or subsequent offense related to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant or other drug, with a prohibited alcohol concentration, or with a measurable amount of a controlled substance in their blood (OWI offense), a court must order the person’s operating privilege restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition interlock device (IID). The restriction begins on the date of the IID order and lasts for at least one year, but no longer than the maximum operating privilege revocation period authorized for the refusal or violation.
Under the bill, the restriction of a person’s operating privilege under an IID order must be extended by 180 days for each occurrence of any of the following events detected by an IID: 1) three or more violations within a 60-day period, 2) tampering with or attempting to circumvent the IID, or 3) removing the IID authorization.
Under current law, a person whose operating privilege is administratively revoked for a first offense of refusing a test may apply for an occupational license after 30 days. The bill eliminates the 30-day waiting period and provides that a person may apply for an occupational license upon installation of an IID on any motor vehicle that the person operates.
Under current law, when a person is convicted of an OWI offense, the convicting court orders the person’s operating privilege be revoked. The length of time for a court-ordered revocation increases with each subsequent OWI offense, as does the waiting period before the person may apply for an occupational license. In general, a person with prior OWI offenses may apply after 45 days. The bill eliminates the 45-day waiting period and provides that a person may apply for an occupational license upon installation of an IID on each motor vehicle that the person operates.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
AB258,1
1
Section

1
.
343.30 (1q) (b) 3. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB258,2,10
2
343.30
(1q)
(b) 3. Except as provided in sub. (1r) or subd. 4m., if the number of
3
convictions under ss. 940.09 (1) and 940.25 in the person’s lifetime, plus the total
4
number of other convictions, suspensions, and revocations counted under s. 343.307
5
(1) within a 10-year period, equals 2, the court shall revoke the person’s operating
6
privilege for not less than one year nor more than 18 months.
After the first 45 days
7
of the revocation period has elapsed, the

The
person is eligible for an occupational
8
license under s. 343.10 if he or she has completed the assessment
and
,
is complying
9
with the driver safety plan ordered under par. (c)
, and has installed an ignition
10
interlock device on each motor vehicle that the person operates
.
AB258,2
11
Section

2
.
343.30 (1q) (b) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB258,3,4
12
343.30
(1q)
(b) 4. Except as provided in sub. (1r) or subd. 4m., if the number of
13
convictions under ss. 940.09 (1) and 940.25 in the person’s lifetime, plus the total
14
number of other convictions, suspensions, and revocations counted under s. 343.307
15
(1), equals 3 or more, the court shall revoke the person’s operating privilege for not
16
less than 2 years nor more than 3 years.
After the first 45 days of the revocation
1
period has elapsed, the

The
person is eligible for an occupational license under s.
2
343.10 if he or she has completed the assessment
and
,
is complying with the driver
3
safety plan ordered under par. (c)
, and has installed an ignition interlock device on
4
any motor vehicle that the person operates
.
AB258,3
5
Section

3
.
343.301 (6) of the statutes is created to read:
AB258,3,10
6
343.301
(6)
(a)

In this section, “violation” means a breath sample that is above
7
the alcohol setpoint of 0.02 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath or failure to
8
provide a passing breath sample within the 5-minute retest window. “Violation”
9
does not include a detectable breath sample that passes a test immediately
10
following a failed test or in response to a bypass or circumvention attempt.
AB258,3,14
11
(b) Notwithstanding sub. (2m) (a) and (b), and subject to par. (c), the
12
restriction of a person’s operating privilege under an order under sub. (1g) (am) 1.
13
shall be extended by 180 days for each occurrence of any of the following events
14
detected by an ignition interlock device:
AB258,3,15
15
1. Three or more violations within a 60-day period.
AB258,3,16
16
2. Tampering with or attempting to circumvent the ignition interlock device.
AB258,3,17
17
3. Removing the ignition interlock device without authorization.
AB258,3,20
18
(c) The department may determine that a person did not commit a violation
19
upon receipt of verified documentation or other information satisfactory to the
20
department that is any of the following:
AB258,3,23
21
1. Documentation or information, provided by the person within 15 days of the
22
notice of the violation, explaining why the person contends the violation was not
23
committed.
AB258,4,2
24
2. Documentation or information, provided by the person’s ignition interlock
1
device provider, indicating that a reported violation resulted from a malfunction of
2
the ignition interlock device for which the person was not responsible.
AB258,4,6
3
(d) The department shall develop an electronic process by which an approved
4
ignition interlock device provider may identify the start date of the restriction of a
5
person’s operating privilege under sub. (2m) and to provide to the department real-
6
time notice of usage and violations and a final compliance report.
AB258,4
7
Section

4
.
343.305 (10) (b) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB258,4,12
8
343.305
(10)
(b) 2. Except as provided in subd. 3., 4.
,
or 4m., for the first
9
improper refusal, the court shall revoke the person’s operating privilege for one
10
year.
After the first 30 days of the revocation period

Upon installation of an ignition
11
interlock device on any motor vehicle that the person operates
, the person is eligible
12
for an occupational license under s. 343.10.
AB258,4,13
13
(end)

Down

Down

/2025/related/proposals/ab258

true

proposaltext

/2025/related/proposals/ab258

proposaltext/2025/REG/AB258

proposaltext/2025/REG/AB258

section

true

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
AB258: Bill Text

×

Details for

PDF view

Link
(Permanent link)

Bookmark this location

View toggle

Go to top of document

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Search in this agency

Search in this chapter group

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Cross references for section

Acts affecting this section

References to this

1970 Statutes Annotations

Appellate Court Citations

Administrative Code Index

Reference lines

Clear highlighting