Back to Wisconsin

AB292 • 2025

the use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation in court proceedings and of telephone or live audiovisual interpretation in criminal trials

the use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation in court proceedings and of telephone or live audiovisual interpretation in criminal trials

Did Not Pass

The latest official action shows that this bill did not move forward in that session.

Sponsor
Representatives Maxey, Kitchens, Allen, Armstrong, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Donovan, Gundrum, Gustafson, Kaufert, Knodl, Kreibich, Melotik, Murphy, Mursau, Neylon, O'Connor, Penterman, Piwowarczyk and Wichgers, cosponsored by Senators Kapenga and Bradley
Last action
2026-03-23
Official status
A - Judiciary
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

the use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation in court proceedings and of telephone or live audiovisual interpretation in criminal trials

the use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation in court proceedings and of telephone or live audiovisual interpretation in criminal trials Status: A - Judiciary

What This Bill Does

  • the use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation in court proceedings and of telephone or live audiovisual interpretation in criminal trials Status: A - Judiciary

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-23 Asm.

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. 2025-05-30 Asm.

    Introduced by Representatives Maxey , Kitchens , Allen , Armstrong , Behnke , Brill , Dittrich , Donovan , Gundrum , Gustafson , Kaufert , Knodl , Kreibich , Melotik , Murphy , Mursau , Neylon , O'Connor , Penterman , Piwowarczyk and Wichgers ; cosponsored by Senators Kapenga and Bradley

  3. 2025-05-30 Asm.

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

Official Summary Text

the use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation in court proceedings and of telephone or live audiovisual interpretation in criminal trials
Status: A - Judiciary

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Wisconsin Legislature: AB292: Bill Text

Skip navigation

Home

Documents

Senate

Assembly

Committees

Service Agencies

Docs

Options

Help

2025 Biennium

Statutes

Admin. Rules

Indices

Miscellaneous

Archives

Home

Bill, Rule, and Appointment Histories

Senators

Representatives

Committees

Text of Introduced Proposals

Amendment Text

Acts

Veto Messages

Enrolled Bills

Votes

Assembly and Senate Floor Calendars

Schedule of Committee Activities

Assembly and Senate Journals

Committee Records (ROCPs)

Legislative Rules

All Session-Related Documents

Subject Index to Acts

Subject Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Journals

Author Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Clearinghouse Rules

Miscellaneous Budget Documents

Executive Orders

Rulings of the Chair

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules

Opinions of the Attorney General

Town Law Forms

Law

Districts

Session

Drafting Files

Feeds

Preferences

Show tree

Hide tree

Feedback

Help

Home

Senate Home

Senators

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Civics Education

Human Resources
Assembly Home

Representatives

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Human Resources
Schedule

Joint

Senate

Assembly

Study
Legislative Audit Bureau

Legislative Council

Legislative Fiscal Bureau

Legislative Human Resources Office

Legislative Reference Bureau

Legislative Technology Services Bureau

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
AB292: Bill Text

Up

Up

2025 - 2026 LEGISLATURE
LRB-0902/1
KRP:cjs
2025 ASSEMBLY BILL 292
May 30, 2025 - Introduced by Representatives
Maxey
,
Kitchens
,
Allen
,
Armstrong
,
Behnke
,
Brill
,
Dittrich
,
Donovan
,
Gundrum
,
Gustafson
,
Kaufert
,
Knodl
,
Kreibich
,
Melotik
,
Murphy
,
Mursau
,
Neylon
,
O'Connor
,
Penterman
,
Piwowarczyk
and
Wichgers
, cosponsored by Senators
Kapenga
and
Bradley
. Referred to Committee on Judiciary.
AB292,1,5
1
An Act

to renumber
807.14;
to renumber and amend
967.09;
to create

2
807.14 (2), 885.37 (6), 885.38 (9) and 967.09 (2) of the statutes;
relating to:

3
the use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation in court
4
proceedings and of telephone or live audiovisual interpretation in criminal
5
trials.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under this bill, a court may allow the use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation in civil or criminal proceedings, certain municipal proceedings, and administrative contested case proceedings.
Under current law, on request of any party, the court may permit an interpreter to act in any criminal proceeding, other than trial, by telephone or live audiovisual means. The bill allows an interpreter to act by telephone or live audiovisual means in a criminal trial in addition to other types of proceedings.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
AB292,1
1
Section

1
.
807.14 of the statutes is renumbered 807.14 (1).
AB292,2
2
Section

2
.
807.14 (2) of the statutes is created to read:
AB292,2,5
3
807.14
(2)
The court may allow the use of artificial intelligence or other
4
machine assisted translation, in lieu of or in addition to an interpreter, in any civil
5
proceeding.
AB292,3
6
Section

3
.
885.37 (6) of the statutes is created to read:
AB292,2,10
7
885.37
(6)
A municipal court or agency may allow the use of artificial
8
intelligence or other machine assisted translation, in lieu of or in addition to an
9
interpreter, under this section. Such use does not require a waiver under sub. (1) or
10
(3) (b).
AB292,4
11
Section

4
.
885.38 (9) of the statutes is created to read:
AB292,2,14
12
885.38
(9)
The court may allow the use of artificial intelligence or other
13
machine assisted translation, in lieu of or in addition to a qualified interpreter,
14
under this section. Such use does not require a waiver under sub. (4) (a).
AB292,5
15
Section

5
.
967.09 of the statutes is renumbered 967.09 (1) and amended to
16
read:
AB292,2,18
17
967.09
(1)
On request of any party, the court may permit an interpreter to act
18
in any criminal proceeding
, other than trial,
by telephone or live audiovisual means.
AB292,6
19
Section

6
.
967.09 (2) of the statutes is created to read:
AB292,2,22
20
967.09
(2)
The court may allow the use of artificial intelligence or other
21
machine assisted translation, in lieu of or in addition to an interpreter, in any
22
criminal proceeding.
AB292,2,23
23
(end)

Down

Down

/2025/related/proposals/ab292

true

proposaltext

/2025/related/proposals/ab292

proposaltext/2025/REG/AB292

proposaltext/2025/REG/AB292

section

true

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
AB292: Bill Text

×

Details for

PDF view

Link
(Permanent link)

Bookmark this location

View toggle

Go to top of document

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Search in this agency

Search in this chapter group

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Cross references for section

Acts affecting this section

References to this

1970 Statutes Annotations

Appellate Court Citations

Administrative Code Index

Reference lines

Clear highlighting