Back to Wisconsin

AB415 • 2025

use restrictions on state and local government electronic devices

use restrictions on state and local government electronic devices

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Representatives Knodl, Gustafson, Dittrich, Duchow, Goeben, Gundrum, Melotik, Mursau, O'Connor, Penterman, Piwowarczyk and Tittl, cosponsored by Senators Cabral-Guevara, Bradley and Nass
Last action
2026-05-13
Official status
A - Veto Sustained
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

use restrictions on state and local government electronic devices

use restrictions on state and local government electronic devices Status: A - Veto Sustained

What This Bill Does

  • use restrictions on state and local government electronic devices Status: A - Veto Sustained

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-13 Asm.

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  2. 2026-05-12 Asm.

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  3. 2026-03-20 Asm.

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-20-2026

  4. 2026-03-18 Asm.

    Presented to the Governor on 3-18-2026

  5. 2026-02-25 Asm.

    LRB correction ( Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 )

  6. 2026-02-25 Asm.

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-25-2026

  7. 2026-02-18 Sen.

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Smith

  8. 2026-02-18 Sen.

    Read a second time

  9. 2026-02-18 Sen.

    Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  10. 2026-02-18 Sen.

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. 2026-02-18 Sen.

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  12. 2026-02-18 Sen.

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  13. 2026-02-18 Sen.

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. 2026-02-18 Asm.

    Received from Senate concurred in

  15. 2026-02-17 Sen.

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization , pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m) , Ayes 3, Noes 2

  16. 2026-02-17 Sen.

    Placed on calendar 2-18-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  17. 2026-02-04 Sen.

    Executive action taken

  18. 2026-02-04 Sen.

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government , Ayes 3, Noes 2

  19. 2026-02-04 Sen.

    Available for scheduling

  20. 2026-01-26 Sen.

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Local Government

  21. 2026-01-22 Asm.

    Read a second time

  22. 2026-01-22 Asm.

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 adopted

  23. 2026-01-22 Asm.

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 adopted

  24. 2026-01-22 Asm.

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. 2026-01-22 Asm.

    Rules suspended

  26. 2026-01-22 Asm.

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44

  27. 2026-01-22 Asm.

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. 2026-01-22 Sen.

    Received from Assembly

  29. 2026-01-21 Asm.

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 offered by Representative Knodl

  30. 2026-01-20 Asm.

    Placed on calendar 1-22-2026 by Committee on Rules

  31. 2026-01-16 Asm.

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI , Ayes 4, Noes 2

  32. 2026-01-16 Asm.

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI , Ayes 4, Noes 2

  33. 2026-01-16 Asm.

    Referred to committee on Rules

  34. 2026-01-14 Asm.

    Executive action taken

  35. 2025-11-18 Asm.

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 offered by Representative Knodl

  36. 2025-11-04 Asm.

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Knodl

  37. 2025-11-04 Asm.

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Knodl

  38. 2025-10-22 Asm.

    Public hearing held

  39. 2025-10-21 Asm.

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Knodl

  40. 2025-09-15 Asm.

    Introduced by Representatives Knodl , Gustafson , Dittrich , Duchow , Goeben , Gundrum , Melotik , Mursau , O'Connor , Penterman , Piwowarczyk and Tittl ; cosponsored by Senators Cabral-Guevara , Bradley and Nass

  41. 2025-09-15 Asm.

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Science, Technology, and AI

Official Summary Text

use restrictions on state and local government electronic devices
Status: A - Veto Sustained

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Wisconsin Legislature: AB415: Text as Enrolled

Skip navigation

Home

Documents

Senate

Assembly

Committees

Service Agencies

Docs

Options

Help

2025 Biennium

Statutes

Admin. Rules

Indices

Miscellaneous

Archives

Home

Bill, Rule, and Appointment Histories

Senators

Representatives

Committees

Text of Introduced Proposals

Amendment Text

Acts

Veto Messages

Enrolled Bills

Votes

Assembly and Senate Floor Calendars

Schedule of Committee Activities

Assembly and Senate Journals

Committee Records (ROCPs)

Legislative Rules

All Session-Related Documents

Subject Index to Acts

Subject Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Journals

Author Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Clearinghouse Rules

Miscellaneous Budget Documents

Executive Orders

Rulings of the Chair

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules

Opinions of the Attorney General

Town Law Forms

Law

Districts

Session

Drafting Files

Feeds

Preferences

Show tree

Hide tree

Feedback

Help

Home

Senate Home

Senators

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Civics Education

Human Resources
Assembly Home

Representatives

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Human Resources
Schedule

Joint

Senate

Assembly

Study
Legislative Audit Bureau

Legislative Council

Legislative Fiscal Bureau

Legislative Human Resources Office

Legislative Reference Bureau

Legislative Technology Services Bureau

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Vetoed in Full
»
AB415: Text as Enrolled

Up

Up

Date of enactment:
2025 Assembly Bill 415

Date of publication*:
2025 WISCONSIN ACT
An Act

to create
20.932 of the statutes;
relating to:
use restrictions on state electronic devices and policies and standards concerning certain information technology.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
AB415,1
Section
1
.
20.932 of the statutes is created to read:
20.932 Use restrictions of state and local government electronic devices.

(1)

Definitions.
In this section:
(a) “Artificial intelligence” means an engineered or machine-based system that varies in its level of autonomy and that can, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer from the input it receives how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments.
(b) “Department” means the department of administration.
(c) 1. Except as provided under subd. 2., “foreign adversary” means any of the following:
a. The People’s Republic of China, including the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the Macau Special Administrative Region.
b. The Republic of Cuba.
c. The Islamic Republic of Iran.
d. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
e. The Russian Federation.
f. The Venezuelan regime of Nicolás Maduro.
2. “Foreign adversary” does not include any country, government, regime, or person specified under subd. 1. if the country, government, regime, or person is not included in the list of foreign adversaries under 15 CFR 791.4, as amended from time to time.
(d) “Generative artificial intelligence” means artificial intelligence that can generate derived synthetic content, including text, images, video, and audio, that emulates the structure and characteristics of its training data.
(e) “State agency” means an association, authority, board, department, commission, independent agency, institution, system, office, society, or other body in state government created or authorized to be created by the constitution or any law.
(2)

Use restrictions.
No state agency, other than a law enforcement agency, as defined in s. 165.83 (1) (b), for law enforcement purposes, may do any of the following using an electronic device that is owned, operated, or leased by the state agency:
(a) Download, use, or access a web-based or other social media application, channel, or platform that is owned or controlled by a foreign adversary.
(b) Use any user-downloaded software, or software application or any generative artificial intelligence that is owned or controlled by a foreign adversary.
(3)

Information technology policies and standards.
(a) In this subsection:
1. “Information technology” has the meaning given in s. 16.97 (6).
2. Notwithstanding sub. (1) (e), “state agency” means a state agency in the executive branch of state government and each authority, as defined in s. 16.41 (4).
(b) 1. The department shall develop and publish policies and standards for officials, employees, and contractors of state agencies regarding information technology that is owned or controlled by a foreign adversary. The policies and standards shall address the information technology’s supply chain, the potential impacts on future state agency procurements, and the potential need for remediation or phase-out of previously procured information technology that is owned or controlled by a foreign adversary.
2. State agencies may not develop or publish their own policies and standards regarding information technology that is owned or controlled by a foreign adversary if the policies and standards are less restrictive than those developed and published by the department.
(c) The legislative technology services bureau shall develop and publish policies and standards for officials, employees, and contractors of the legislature regarding information technology that is owned or controlled by a foreign adversary. The policies and standards shall address the information technology’s supply chain, the potential impacts on future procurements, and the potential need for remediation or phase-out of previously procured information technology that is owned or controlled by a foreign adversary.
(d) The director of state courts shall develop and publish policies and standards for officials, employees, and contractors of the court system regarding information technology that is owned or controlled by a foreign adversary. The policies and standards shall address the information technology’s supply chain, the potential impacts on future procurements, and the potential need for remediation or phase-out of previously procured information technology that is owned or controlled by a foreign adversary.
(e) No policy or standard under par. (b), (c), or (d) applies to a law enforcement agency, as defined in s. 165.83 (1) (b), using information technology for law enforcement purposes.
AB415,2
Section

2
. Effective dates.
This act takes effect on January 31, 2027.

Down

Down

/2025/related/vetoedinfull/ab415

true

vetoedenrolledbills

/2025/related/vetoedinfull/ab415

vetoedenrolledbills/2025/REG/AB415

vetoedenrolledbills/2025/REG/AB415

section

true

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Vetoed in Full
»
AB415: Text as Enrolled

×

Details for

PDF view

Link
(Permanent link)

Bookmark this location

View toggle

Go to top of document

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Search in this agency

Search in this chapter group

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Cross references for section

Acts affecting this section

References to this

1970 Statutes Annotations

Appellate Court Citations

Administrative Code Index

Reference lines

Clear highlighting