Back to Wisconsin

AB73 • 2025

statutory recognition of specialized treatment court and commercial court dockets

statutory recognition of specialized treatment court and commercial court dockets

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Representatives Tusler, B. Jacobson, Brooks, Knodl, Murphy and O'Connor, cosponsored by Senators Jacque and Wimberger
Last action
2026-05-13
Official status
A - Veto Sustained
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

statutory recognition of specialized treatment court and commercial court dockets

statutory recognition of specialized treatment court and commercial court dockets Status: A - Veto Sustained

What This Bill Does

  • statutory recognition of specialized treatment court and commercial court dockets Status: A - Veto Sustained

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-13 Asm.

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  2. 2026-05-12 Asm.

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  3. 2025-08-11 Asm.

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 8-8-2025

  4. 2025-08-07 Asm.

    Presented to the Governor on 8-7-2025

  5. 2025-05-16 Asm.

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-16-2025

  6. 2025-05-15 Sen.

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Roys , L. Johnson , Keyeski , Spreitzer , Habush Sinykin , Dassler-Alfheim , Smith , Drake , Larson , Carpenter , Wirch and Hesselbein

  7. 2025-05-15 Sen.

    Read a second time

  8. 2025-05-15 Sen.

    Point of order that Senate Amendment 1 was not germane well taken

  9. 2025-05-15 Sen.

    Decision of the Chair stands as the judgment of the Senate, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  10. 2025-05-15 Sen.

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. 2025-05-15 Sen.

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  12. 2025-05-15 Sen.

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  13. 2025-05-15 Sen.

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. 2025-05-15 Asm.

    Received from Senate concurred in

  15. 2025-05-13 Sen.

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization , pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m) , Ayes 3, Noes 2

  16. 2025-05-13 Sen.

    Placed on calendar 5-15-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  17. 2025-05-08 Sen.

    Executive action taken

  18. 2025-05-08 Sen.

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety , Ayes 5, Noes 3

  19. 2025-05-08 Sen.

    Available for scheduling

  20. 2025-04-24 Sen.

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  21. 2025-04-23 Sen.

    Received from Assembly

  22. 2025-04-22 Asm.

    Read a second time

  23. 2025-04-22 Asm.

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. 2025-04-22 Asm.

    Rules suspended

  25. 2025-04-22 Asm.

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 42, Paired 2

  26. 2025-04-22 Asm.

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. 2025-04-17 Asm.

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2025 by Committee on Rules

  28. 2025-04-15 Asm.

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Prevention , Ayes 7, Noes 2

  29. 2025-04-15 Asm.

    Referred to committee on Rules

  30. 2025-04-03 Asm.

    Executive action taken

  31. 2025-04-01 Asm.

    Public hearing held

  32. 2025-04-01 Asm.

    Representative Dittrich added as a coauthor

  33. 2025-02-24 Asm.

    Introduced by Representatives Tusler , B. Jacobson , Brooks , Knodl , Murphy and O'Connor ; cosponsored by Senators Jacque and Wimberger

  34. 2025-02-24 Asm.

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Prevention

Official Summary Text

statutory recognition of specialized treatment court and commercial court dockets
Status: A - Veto Sustained

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Wisconsin Legislature: AB73: Text as Enrolled

Skip navigation

Home

Documents

Senate

Assembly

Committees

Service Agencies

Docs

Options

Help

2025 Biennium

Statutes

Admin. Rules

Indices

Miscellaneous

Archives

Home

Bill, Rule, and Appointment Histories

Senators

Representatives

Committees

Text of Introduced Proposals

Amendment Text

Acts

Veto Messages

Enrolled Bills

Votes

Assembly and Senate Floor Calendars

Schedule of Committee Activities

Assembly and Senate Journals

Committee Records (ROCPs)

Legislative Rules

All Session-Related Documents

Subject Index to Acts

Subject Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Journals

Author Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Clearinghouse Rules

Miscellaneous Budget Documents

Executive Orders

Rulings of the Chair

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules

Opinions of the Attorney General

Town Law Forms

Law

Districts

Session

Drafting Files

Feeds

Preferences

Show tree

Hide tree

Feedback

Help

Home

Senate Home

Senators

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Civics Education

Human Resources
Assembly Home

Representatives

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Human Resources
Schedule

Joint

Senate

Assembly

Study
Legislative Audit Bureau

Legislative Council

Legislative Fiscal Bureau

Legislative Human Resources Office

Legislative Reference Bureau

Legislative Technology Services Bureau

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Vetoed in Full
»
AB73: Text as Enrolled

Up

Up

Date of enactment:
2025 Assembly Bill 73

Date of publication*:
2025 WISCONSIN ACT
An Act

to create
chapter 798 of the statutes;
relating to:
statutory recognition of specialized treatment court and commercial court dockets.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
AB73,1
Section
1
.
Chapter 798 of the statutes is created to read:
CHAPTER 798
SPECIALTY COURTS
798.01 Legislative findings.
The legislature finds all of the following:
(1)
Specialized dockets for treatment courts and for commercial cases have existed in this state and across the country for a number of years in recognition of the fact that the interests of justice in general, and of litigants in particular, are substantially enhanced when judges and other court personnel commit to take specific training in the subject matter areas of a particular specialized docket and then apply that training and expertise to the unique issues before the court. The use of specialized dockets increases efficiencies and improve outcomes in the handling of these cases.
(2)
The commercial court docket has existed in this state for over 7 years as a pilot project in a number of counties and judicial districts and has been shown to reduce substantially the time it takes to obtain a decision and increase the level of satisfaction of the parties with the results in commercial disputes.
798.05 Treatment court dockets. (1)
Purpose; authority.
The purpose of this section is to statutorily recognize specialized dockets for treatment courts. Treatment courts are designed to operate within the framework of the existing state court system and specifically address underlying issues relating to criminal behavior. Treatment courts provide treatment while working with a multidisciplinary team to deploy a range of graduated rewards and sanctions with the goal of engaging participants in treatment long enough to successfully address any addiction or mental health issues and end the cycle of recidivism.
(2)
Definition.
In this section, “treatment court” includes all of the following:
(a) Adult drug treatment court.
(b) Juvenile drug treatment court.
(c) Operating while intoxicated treatment court.
(d) Mental health treatment court.
(e) Family dependency treatment court.
(f) Veterans treatment court.
(g) Hybrid treatment court.
(h) Tribal healing to wellness court.
798.15

Commercial court docket.

(1)

Purpose; authority.
The purpose of this section is to statutorily recognize a specialized docket for commercial cases in state circuit courts. The commercial court docket is designed to operate within the framework of the existing state court system with minimal impact on the balance of court operations. It is intended to leverage judicial expertise in commercial law and disputes with commercial litigants’ desire to tailor case management practices best suited for resolving substantial business disputes fairly and expeditiously.
(2)

Definitions.
In this section:
(a) “Business organization” includes a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, limited partnership, professional association, benefits corporation, service corporation, joint venture, bank, savings bank, savings and loan association, or business trust. A “business organization” excludes an individual, a family trust, or a political subdivision or governmental entity.
(b) “Consumer contract or transaction” means a consumer contract or transaction that is primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
(3)

Scope.
(a) The commercial court procedures outlined in this section apply to judicial administrative districts that have established specialized dockets for commercial cases on the effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date], and to any commercial court docket established after the effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date], beginning on the date that docket is established. Courts with specialized dockets for commercial cases shall be referred to as the “commercial court.”
(b) 1. The chief justice of the supreme court, after considering the recommendation of the chief judge of the encompassing judicial administrative district, shall select the circuit court judges in the judicial administrative districts who will be assigned to the commercial court docket upon each judge’s agreement to so serve. The chief justice of the supreme court shall select at least all of the following to participate in the commercial court under this section:
a. No fewer than 4 circuit court judges within the 2nd judicial administrative district.
b. No fewer than 4 circuit court judges within the 3rd judicial administrative district.
c. No fewer than 4 circuit court judges within the 5th judicial administrative district.
d. No fewer than 4 circuit court judges within the 8th judicial administrative district.
e. No fewer than 4 circuit court judges within the 10th judicial administrative district.
f. No fewer than 4 circuit court judges within any judicial administrative district that adds a commercial court docket.
2. A judge who presides in a commercial court docket is not prohibited from working on any other assigned docket.
3. The chief justice of the supreme court may add additional judicial administrative districts to the commercial court docket upon the recommendation of the director of state courts.
(4)
Mandatory assignment of cases to the commercial court docket.
(a) Any case of a type described under par. (b) that is filed in a circuit court in which a commercial court docket has been established shall be assigned to the commercial court docket as provided under sub. (7).
(b) The commercial court shall have jurisdiction over all of the following types of cases:
1. Cases involving the governance or internal affairs of business organizations, including all of the following:
a. Claims between or among owners or constituents of a business organization.
b. Claims against officers, directors, or managers of a business organization.
c. Claims involving the indemnity of owners, officers, directors, or managers of a business organization.
d. Claims involving the interpretation of the rights and obligations under the law governing business organizations, such as chs. 178 to 181, 183, 185, 204, 214, 215, and 221 to 223, or any similar statute or law from another jurisdiction.
e. Claims involving the interpretation of the rights and obligations under any agreement governing a business organization, such as the articles of incorporation, bylaws, operating agreements, membership agreements, or partnership agreement of the business organization.
2. Cases involving tortious or statutorily prohibited business activity, unfair competition, or antitrust, including all of the following:
a. Claims under ch. 133.
b. Claims under s. 100.30 (5m) or (5r).
c. Claims under s. 134.01.
d. Claims of tortious interference with a business organization.
e. Claims involving restrictive covenants and agreements not to compete or solicit.
f. Claims involving confidentiality agreements.
3. Cases involving the sale, consolidation, or merger of a business organization or the conversion, share exchange, or sale of substantially all of the assets of a business organization.
4. Cases involving the issuance, sale, or transfer of securities, including claims for securities fraud under ch. 551, or any similar statute or law from another jurisdiction.
5. Cases involving intellectual property rights, including all of the following:
a. Claims to determine the use, ownership, or status of trademarks, trade secrets, or copyrights.
b. Claims under s. 134.90.
c. Claims involving any agreement relating to the licensing of any intellectual property right, including patent rights.
6. Cases involving the relationship between a franchisor and franchisee or similar distribution relationship, including all of the following:
a. Claims arising from ch. 135 or any similar statute or law from another jurisdiction.
b. Claims arising from s. 134.93 or any similar statute or law from another jurisdiction.
c. Claims arising from ch. 553 or any similar statute or law from another jurisdiction.
7. Cases involving claims or disputes under ch. 402, 403, 404, 405, or 409, or any similar statute or law from another jurisdiction, when the amount in controversy exceeds $100,000, exclusive of interest, costs, and attorney fees.

Down

Down

/2025/related/vetoedinfull/ab73

true

vetoedenrolledbills

/2025/related/vetoedinfull/ab73

vetoedenrolledbills/2025/REG/AB73

vetoedenrolledbills/2025/REG/AB73

section

true

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Vetoed in Full
»
AB73: Text as Enrolled

×

Details for

PDF view

Link
(Permanent link)

Bookmark this location

View toggle

Go to top of document

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Search in this agency

Search in this chapter group

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Cross references for section

Acts affecting this section

References to this

1970 Statutes Annotations

Appellate Court Citations

Administrative Code Index

Reference lines

Clear highlighting