Back to Wisconsin

SB375 • 2025

the use of speed safety camera systems and traffic control photographic systems in a first class city and providing a penalty

the use of speed safety camera systems and traffic control photographic systems in a first class city and providing a penalty

Did Not Pass

The latest official action shows that this bill did not move forward in that session.

Sponsor
Senators Tomczyk, Drake, L. Johnson, Carpenter, Habush Sinykin, Keyeski, Pfaff, Spreitzer and James, cosponsored by Representatives Novak, Haywood, Goodwin, Kirsch, Brooks, Duchow, Knodl, Miresse, Melotik, Tusler, Arney, Palmeri, Prado, Neylon, Udell, Sinicki and Phelps
Last action
2026-03-23
Official status
S - Transportation and Local Government
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

the use of speed safety camera systems and traffic control photographic systems in a first class city and providing a penalty

the use of speed safety camera systems and traffic control photographic systems in a first class city and providing a penalty Status: S - Transportation and Local Government

What This Bill Does

  • the use of speed safety camera systems and traffic control photographic systems in a first class city and providing a penalty Status: S - Transportation and Local Government

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-23 Sen.

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. 2026-01-09 Sen.

    Representative J. Jacobson added as a cosponsor

  3. 2025-11-03 Sen.

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. 2025-10-07 Sen.

    Representative Andraca added as a cosponsor

  5. 2025-10-07 Sen.

    Public hearing held

  6. 2025-07-21 Sen.

    Representatives Phelps and Sinicki withdrawn as cosponsors

  7. 2025-07-16 Sen.

    Introduced by Senators Tomczyk , Drake , L. Johnson , Carpenter , Habush Sinykin , Keyeski , Pfaff , Spreitzer and James ; cosponsored by Representatives Novak , Haywood , Goodwin , Kirsch , Brooks , Duchow , Knodl , Miresse , Melotik , Tusler , Arney , Palmeri , Prado , Neylon , Udell , Sinicki and Phelps

  8. 2025-07-16 Sen.

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government

Official Summary Text

the use of speed safety camera systems and traffic control photographic systems in a first class city and providing a penalty
Status: S - Transportation and Local Government

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Wisconsin Legislature: SB375: Bill Text

Skip navigation

Home

Documents

Senate

Assembly

Committees

Service Agencies

Docs

Options

Help

2025 Biennium

Statutes

Admin. Rules

Indices

Miscellaneous

Archives

Home

Bill, Rule, and Appointment Histories

Senators

Representatives

Committees

Text of Introduced Proposals

Amendment Text

Acts

Veto Messages

Enrolled Bills

Votes

Assembly and Senate Floor Calendars

Schedule of Committee Activities

Assembly and Senate Journals

Committee Records (ROCPs)

Legislative Rules

All Session-Related Documents

Subject Index to Acts

Subject Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Journals

Author Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Clearinghouse Rules

Miscellaneous Budget Documents

Executive Orders

Rulings of the Chair

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules

Opinions of the Attorney General

Town Law Forms

Law

Districts

Session

Drafting Files

Feeds

Preferences

Show tree

Hide tree

Feedback

Help

Home

Senate Home

Senators

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Civics Education

Human Resources
Assembly Home

Representatives

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Human Resources
Schedule

Joint

Senate

Assembly

Study
Legislative Audit Bureau

Legislative Council

Legislative Fiscal Bureau

Legislative Human Resources Office

Legislative Reference Bureau

Legislative Technology Services Bureau

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
SB375: Bill Text

Up

Up

2025 - 2026 LEGISLATURE
LRB-3709/1
EVM:wlj
2025 SENATE BILL 375
July 16, 2025 - Introduced by Senators
Tomczyk
,
Drake
,
L. Johnson
,
Carpenter
,
Habush Sinykin
,
Keyeski
,
Pfaff
,
Spreitzer
and
James
, cosponsored by Representatives
Novak
,
Haywood
,
Goodwin
,
Kirsch
,
Brooks
,
Duchow
,
Knodl
,
Miresse
,
Melotik
,
Tusler
,
Arney
,
Palmeri
,
Prado
,
Neylon
,
Udell
,
Sinicki
and
Phelps
. Referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government.
SB375,1,4
1
An Act

to amend
346.01 (2), 346.02 (12) and 346.43 (1) (b) 1.;
to create

2
346.375, 346.43 (5), 346.575 and 346.60 (6) of the statutes;
relating to:
the
3
use of speed safety camera systems and traffic control photographic systems in
4
a first class city and providing a penalty.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill allows law enforcement agencies in a first class city (presently only Milwaukee) to use a speed safety camera system (SSCS) to identify speed limit violations and a traffic control photographic system (TCPS) to identify certain traffic signal violations.
Under current law, law enforcement officers may not use any radar device combined with photographic identification of a vehicle to determine compliance with motor vehicle speed limits. Under this bill, a first class city may use an SSCS to determine compliance with speed limits. With exceptions, the vehicle owner is subject to a forfeiture for a speed limit violation detected by an SSCS. However, no traffic citation may be issued for a speed limit violation for which the SSCS indicated a speed of less than 15 miles per hour above the speed limit alleged to be violated. The owner is subject to the same forfeiture that would be applicable to the vehicle operator for the violation. The bill also imposes a number of administrative requirements on a municipality that uses an SSCS to determine compliance with speed limits. The authorization of the use of an SSCS to determine compliance with speed limits expires five years after an SSCS is implemented.
This bill also authorizes a first class city to use a TCPS to detect motor vehicles that fail to properly stop at red traffic signals at intersections. A TCPS is an electronic system that automatically produces photographs of motor vehicles traveling through an intersection. With exceptions, the vehicle owner is subject to a forfeiture for a traffic signal violation detected by a TCPS of not more than the amount provided for a traffic signal violation under current law, currently between $20 and $100. The authorization of the use of a TCPS to detect traffic signal violations expires five years after a TCPS is implemented.
Forfeitures collected under either of these authorizations must be appropriated for the costs of implementing and operating the system and after those costs have been paid may be used only for traffic enforcement, traffic safety programs, and traffic safety infrastructure.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SB375,1
1
Section
1
.
346.01 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB375,2,6
2
346.01
(2)
In this chapter, notwithstanding s. 340.01 (42), “owner” means,
3
with respect to a vehicle that is registered, or is required to be registered, by a lessee
4
of the vehicle under ch. 341, the lessee of the vehicle for purposes of vehicle owner
5
liability under ss. 346.175, 346.195, 346.205,
346.375,
346.452, 346.457, 346.465,
6
346.485, 346.505 (3),
346.575,
346.675, and 346.945.
SB375,2
7
Section

2
.
346.02 (12) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB375,3,4
8
346.02
(12)

Applicability to electric scooters and electric personal
9
assistive mobility devices.
An electric scooter and an electric personal assistive
10
mobility device shall be considered a vehicle for purposes of ss. 346.04 to 346.10,
11
346.12, 346.13, 346.15, 346.16, 346.18, 346.19, 346.20, 346.215 (3), 346.23 to
12
346.28, 346.31 to 346.35, 346.37
, 346.38
to 346.40, 346.44, 346.46, 346.47, 346.48,
13
346.50 to 346.55, 346.57, 346.59, 346.62, 346.65 (5m), 346.67 to 346.70, 346.78,
1
346.80, 346.87, 346.88, 346.90, 346.91, and 346.94 (4), (5), (9), and (10), except those
2
provisions which by their express terms apply only to motor vehicles or which by
3
their very nature would have no application to electric scooters or electric personal
4
assistive mobility devices.
SB375,3
5
Section

3
.
346.375 of the statutes is created to read:
SB375,3,11
6
346.375

Owner’s liability for certain violations related to traffic
7
control signals.

(1)
In this section, “traffic control photographic system” or
8
“system” means an electronic system consisting of a photographic, video, or
9
electronic camera and a vehicle sensor installed for use with an official traffic
10
control signal to automatically produce photographs or video or digital images,
11
stamped with the time and date, of vehicles moving through an intersection.
SB375,3,13
12
(2)
(a) Subject to sub. (6), a local authority may use a traffic control
13
photographic system to detect a motor vehicle doing any of the following:
SB375,3,16
14
1. When facing a traffic control signal at an intersection that exhibits a red
15
light, including a flashing red light, fully entering the intersection without
16
stopping.
SB375,3,20
17
2. When facing a traffic control signal at an intersection that exhibits a red
18
light, other than a flashing red light, after stopping at the intersection, proceeding
19
through the intersection before the traffic control signal exhibits a green light if the
20
vehicle is not making a right turn.
SB375,3,23
21
(b) Subject to sub. (5), the owner of a vehicle involved in a violation of par. (a)
22
or a local ordinance in conformity with par. (a) that is determined by a system shall
23
be liable for the violation as provided in this section.
SB375,4,7
24
(3)
If a traffic officer or other employee of the local authority prepares a
1
uniform traffic citation under s. 345.11 for a violation of this section, the traffic
2
officer or employee shall serve the owner of the vehicle with the citation, within 30
3
business days after the violation, by personal service or by mailing the citation by
4
1st class mail addressed to the owner’s last-known address. A traffic officer or
5
employee shall send with the citation a duplicate of the photograph, video, or digital
6
image, taken by the traffic control photographic system, of the vehicle involved in
7
the violation.
SB375,4,12
8
(4)
Any forfeiture collected under this section shall be deposited into a
9
separate segregated account from which moneys shall be used for the costs of
10
implementing and operating the system and after those costs have been paid shall
11
be administered by the collecting local authority and may be used only for purposes
12
of traffic enforcement, traffic safety programs, and traffic safety infrastructure.
SB375,4,14
13
(5)
(a) Except as provided in par. (b), it is not a defense to a violation of this
14
section that the owner was not in control of the vehicle at the time of the violation.
SB375,4,15
15
(b) All of the following are defenses to a violation of this section:
SB375,4,18
16
1. That a report that the vehicle was stolen was made by the owner to a law
17
enforcement agency before the violation occurred or within 7 business days after
18
the violation occurred.
SB375,5,2
19
2. That the vehicle is owned by a lessor of vehicles and is registered in the
20
name of the lessor, that at the time of the violation the vehicle was in the possession
21
of a lessee, and that the lessor provided a traffic officer or designated employee of
22
the local authority with the information required under s. 343.46 (3). In that case,
1
the lessee may be charged with a violation of s. 346.37 (1) (c) 1. or an ordinance in
2
conformity with s. 346.37 (1) (c) 1.
SB375,5,9
3
3. That the vehicle is owned by a dealer, as defined in s. 340.01 (11) (intro.),
4
but including the persons specified in s. 340.01 (11) (a) to (d), at the time of the
5
violation the vehicle was being operated by a person on a trial run, and the dealer
6
provided a traffic officer or designated employee of the local authority with the
7
name, address, and operator’s license number of the person operating the vehicle.
8
In that case, the person operating the vehicle may be charged with a violation of s.
9
346.37 (1) (c) 1. or an ordinance in conformity with s. 346.37 (1) (c) 1.
SB375,5,11
10
(6)
If a local authority uses a traffic control photographic system, the local
11
authority shall do all of the following:
SB375,5,15
12
(a) Place official traffic signs at or reasonably near the jurisdictional limits of
13
the local authority on all county trunk highways and state trunk highways under
14
the jurisdiction of the local authority informing motorists that intersections in the
15
local authority may be monitored by traffic control photographic systems.
SB375,5,19
16
(b) Ensure that any photograph or video or digital image produced by the
17
traffic control photographic system is taken from a direction to the rear of the
18
vehicles moving through an intersection and be focused on the rear registration
19
plate of such vehicles.
SB375,5,22
20
(c) Use traffic control photographic systems only at intersections that are
21
identified as having an annual accident rate of 1.0 or greater in studies performed
22
by the local authority in the 5 most recent years of high-frequency crash locations.
SB375,6,5
23
(7)
Nothing in this section prohibits the issuance of a citation to the operator
1
of a motor vehicle for a violation of s. 346.37 (1) (c) 1. or a local ordinance in
2
conformity with s. 346.37 (1) (c) 1., but a person may not be subject to a forfeiture for
3
a violation under this section and a violation of s. 346.37 (1) (c) 1. or a local
4
ordinance in conformity with s. 346.37 (1) (c) 1. arising from the same incident or
5
occurrence.
SB375,6,6
6
(8)
(a) This section applies only in a 1st class city.
SB375,6,9
7
(b) If a 1st class city uses traffic control photographic systems under this
8
section, systems may be used at no more than 5 intersections in an aldermanic
9
district.
SB375,6,11
10
(9)
Subsection (2) does not apply 5 years after the initial implementation of a
11
traffic control photographic system.
SB375,4
12
Section

4
.
346.43 (1) (b) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:
SB375,6,16
13
346.43
(1)
(b) 1. Except as provided in subd. 2. or 3. or sub. (4), any operator of
14
a vehicle violating ss. 346.37
to
, 346.38, or
346.39 may be required to forfeit not less
15
than $20 nor more than $40 for the first offense and not less than $50 nor more
16
than $100 for the 2nd or subsequent conviction within a year.
SB375,5
17
Section

5
.
346.43 (5) of the statutes is created to read:
SB375,7,2
18
346.43
(5)
A vehicle owner found liable under s. 346.375 is subject to a
19
forfeiture of the same amount that may be imposed on a vehicle operator for the
20
corresponding violation of s. 346.37 (1) (c) 1. including, if applicable, the doubling of
21
the forfeiture as provided in sub. (1) (b) 3. For purposes of this subsection a person’s
22
prior violation of s. 346.37 (1) (c) 1. may be counted as a prior violation of s. 346.375.
23
Imposition of liability under s. 346.375 shall not result in suspension or revocation
1
of a person’s operating privilege under s. 343.30 or 343.31, nor shall it result in
2
demerit points being recorded on a person’s driving record under s. 343.32 (2) (a).
SB375,6
3
Section
6
.
346.575 of the statutes is created to read:
SB375,7,8
4
346.575

Owner’s liability for speed restriction violations detected by
5
a speed safety camera system.

(1)
In this section, “speed safety camera system”
6
or “system” means an electronic device that uses automated equipment to detect a
7
vehicle’s speed and that is designed to obtain a clear visual image of a vehicle’s rear
8
license plate.
SB375,7,14
9
(2)
Notwithstanding s. 349.02 (3) (b) and subject to sub. (6), a local authority
10
may use a speed safety camera system to determine compliance with a speed
11
restriction established under s. 346.57 or 349.11 on highways under its jurisdiction.
12
Subject to sub. (5) (b), the owner of a vehicle involved in a violation of s. 346.57 or a
13
local ordinance in conformity with s. 346.57 that is determined by a system shall be
14
liable for the violation as provided in this section.
SB375,8,2
15
(3)
If a traffic officer or other employee of the local authority reviews and
16
prepares a uniform traffic citation under s. 345.11 for a violation of this section, the
17
officer or employee shall serve the owner of the vehicle with the citation by mailing
18
the citation by 1st class mail addressed to the owner’s last-known address within 30
19
business days after the violation. A traffic officer or employee shall send with the
20
citation a duplicate of a visual image, taken by the speed safety camera system, of
21
the rear license plate of the vehicle involved in the violation, the system’s location,
22
and the date and time when the violation occurred. No traffic citation may be
23
issued for a violation under this section for which the system indicated a speed of
1
less than 15 miles per hour above the speed restriction established under s. 346.57
2
or 349.11.
SB375,8,7
3
(4)
Any forfeiture collected under this section shall be deposited into a
4
separate segregated account from which moneys shall be used for the costs of
5
implementing the system and after those costs have been paid shall be
6
administered by the collecting local authority and may be used only for purposes of
7
traffic enforcement, traffic safety programs, and traffic safety infrastructure.
SB375,8,9
8
(5)
(a) Except as provided in par. (b), it is not a defense to a violation of this
9
section that the owner was not operating the vehicle at the time of the violation.
SB375,8,10
10
(b) All of the following are defenses to a violation of this section:
SB375,8,13
11
1. That a report that the vehicle was stolen was made by the owner to a law
12
enforcement agency before the violation occurred or within 7 business days after
13
the violation occurred.
SB375,8,18
14
2. That the owner of the vehicle provided a traffic officer or employee of the
15
local authority with the name and address of the person operating the vehicle at the
16
time of the violation and the person so named admits operating the vehicle at the
17
time of the violation. In that case, the person operating the vehicle may be charged
18
with a violation of s. 346.57 or a local ordinance in conformity with s. 346.57.
SB375,9,2
19
3. That the vehicle is owned by a lessor of vehicles and is registered in the
20
name of the lessor, that at the time of the violation the vehicle was in the possession
21
of a lessee, and that the lessor provided a traffic officer or employee of the local
22
authority with the information required under s. 343.46 (3). In that case, the lessee
1
may be charged with a violation of s. 346.57 or a local ordinance in conformity with
2
s. 346.57.
SB375,9,9
3
4. That the vehicle is owned by a dealer, as defined in s. 340.01 (11) (intro.),
4
but including the persons specified in s. 340.01 (11) (a) to (d), that at the time of the
5
violation the vehicle was being operated by a person on a trial run, and that the
6
dealer provided a traffic officer or employee of the local authority with the name,
7
address, and operator’s license number of the person operating the vehicle. In that
8
case, the person operating the vehicle may be charged with a violation of s. 346.57
9
or a local ordinance in conformity with s. 346.57.
SB375,9,11
10
(6)
(a) If a local authority uses a speed safety camera system, the local
11
authority shall do all of the following:
SB375,9,17
12
1. Clearly identify the presence of a system by signs stating “Photo Enforced,”
13
along with the posted speed limit. The signs shall conform to the manual on the
14
uniform system of traffic control devices adopted by the department under s. 84.02
15
(4) (e), shall be visible to traffic traveling on the highway from the direction of travel
16
for which the system is used, and shall be posted at all locations the local authority
17
determines are necessary to provide adequate notice of the presence of a system.

Down

Down

/2025/related/proposals/sb375

true

proposaltext

/2025/related/proposals/sb375

proposaltext/2025/REG/SB375

proposaltext/2025/REG/SB375

section

true

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
SB375: Bill Text

×

Details for

PDF view

Link
(Permanent link)

Bookmark this location

View toggle

Go to top of document

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Search in this agency

Search in this chapter group

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Cross references for section

Acts affecting this section

References to this

1970 Statutes Annotations

Appellate Court Citations

Administrative Code Index

Reference lines

Clear highlighting