Back to Wisconsin

SB472 • 2025

required approvals of rezoning requests related to residential development, contents of and consistency of local ordinances with local comprehensive plans, certain tax incremental district project costs related to residential development, and tax incremental district lifespan extension

required approvals of rezoning requests related to residential development, contents of and consistency of local ordinances with local comprehensive plans, certain tax incremental district project costs related to residential development, and tax incremental district lifespan extension

Taxes
Did Not Pass

The latest official action shows that this bill did not move forward in that session.

Sponsor
Senator Jagler, cosponsored by Representatives Armstrong, Brooks, Dittrich, Knodl, Kreibich, Murphy, O'Connor, Piwowarczyk, Summerfield and Penterman
Last action
2026-03-23
Official status
S - Hold (Available for Scheduling)
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

required approvals of rezoning requests related to residential development, contents of and consistency of local ordinances with local comprehensive plans, certain tax incremental district project costs related to residential development, and tax incremental district lifespan extension

required approvals of rezoning requests related to residential development, contents of and consistency of local ordinances with local comprehensive plans, certain tax incremental district project costs related to residential development, and tax incremental district lifespan extension Status: S - Hold (Available for Scheduling)

What This Bill Does

  • required approvals of rezoning requests related to residential development, contents of and consistency of local ordinances with local comprehensive plans, certain tax incremental district project costs related to residential development, and tax incremental district lifespan extension Status: S - Hold (Available for Scheduling)

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-23 Sen.

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. 2026-03-19 Sen.

    Representative Emerson added as a cosponsor

  3. 2026-02-18 Sen.

    Senator Ratcliff added as a coauthor

  4. 2025-11-11 Sen.

    Executive action taken

  5. 2025-11-11 Sen.

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry , Ayes 5, Noes 0

  6. 2025-11-11 Sen.

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry , Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. 2025-11-11 Sen.

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry , Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. 2025-11-11 Sen.

    Available for scheduling

  9. 2025-10-30 Sen.

    Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Jagler

  10. 2025-10-28 Sen.

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. 2025-10-15 Sen.

    Public hearing held

  12. 2025-10-10 Sen.

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Jagler

  13. 2025-10-02 Sen.

    Introduced by Senator Jagler ; cosponsored by Representatives Armstrong , Brooks , Dittrich , Knodl , Kreibich , Murphy , O'Connor , Piwowarczyk , Summerfield and Penterman

  14. 2025-10-02 Sen.

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry

Official Summary Text

required approvals of rezoning requests related to residential development, contents of and consistency of local ordinances with local comprehensive plans, certain tax incremental district project costs related to residential development, and tax incremental district lifespan extension
Status: S - Hold (Available for Scheduling)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Wisconsin Legislature: SB472: Bill Text

Skip navigation

Home

Documents

Senate

Assembly

Committees

Service Agencies

Docs

Options

Help

2025 Biennium

Statutes

Admin. Rules

Indices

Miscellaneous

Archives

Home

Bill, Rule, and Appointment Histories

Senators

Representatives

Committees

Text of Introduced Proposals

Amendment Text

Acts

Veto Messages

Enrolled Bills

Votes

Assembly and Senate Floor Calendars

Schedule of Committee Activities

Assembly and Senate Journals

Committee Records (ROCPs)

Legislative Rules

All Session-Related Documents

Subject Index to Acts

Subject Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Journals

Author Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Clearinghouse Rules

Miscellaneous Budget Documents

Executive Orders

Rulings of the Chair

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules

Opinions of the Attorney General

Town Law Forms

Law

Districts

Session

Drafting Files

Feeds

Preferences

Show tree

Hide tree

Feedback

Help

Home

Senate Home

Senators

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Civics Education

Human Resources
Assembly Home

Representatives

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Human Resources
Schedule

Joint

Senate

Assembly

Study
Legislative Audit Bureau

Legislative Council

Legislative Fiscal Bureau

Legislative Human Resources Office

Legislative Reference Bureau

Legislative Technology Services Bureau

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
SB472: Bill Text

Up

Up

2025 - 2026 LEGISLATURE
LRB-4897/1
EVM:cdc&wlj
2025 SENATE BILL 472
October 2, 2025 - Introduced by Senator
Jagler
, cosponsored by Representatives
Armstrong
,
Brooks
,
Dittrich
,
Knodl
,
Kreibich
,
Murphy
,
O'Connor
,
Piwowarczyk
,
Summerfield
and
Penterman
. Referred to Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry.
SB472,1,11
1
An Act

to repeal
66.1001 (1) (am) and 66.1001 (3m);
to renumber and
2
amend
66.1001 (2) (h), 66.1001 (3), 66.10016 (3) and 66.10016 (4);
to amend

3
59.69 (3) (a), 62.23 (3) (b), 66.1001 (2m) (title), 66.1001 (2m) (a), 66.1002 (2)
4
(intro.), 66.1105 (6) (g) 1. (intro.) and 66.1105 (6) (g) 3.;
to repeal and
5
recreate
66.1001 (3) (title);
to create
66.1001 (2) (h) 4., 66.1001 (3) (b),
6
66.1001 (3) (c), 66.10016 (3) (b), 66.10016 (4) (b), 66.10016 (5) and 66.1105 (2)
7
(cs) of the statutes;
relating to:
required approvals of rezoning requests
8
related to residential development, contents of and consistency of local
9
ordinances with local comprehensive plans, certain tax incremental district
10
project costs related to residential development, and tax incremental district
11
lifespan extension.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill provides for mandatory rezoning upon certain requests for rezoning related to residential development, requires certain information in comprehensive plans of political subdivisions, allows for a longer extension of the lifespan of a tax incremental district (TID) for housing stock improvement purposes, and provides a definition of “newly platted residential construction” for the purpose of defining certain costs that may be included as project costs for a TID.
Mandatory rezoning and comprehensive planning
This bill requires a political subdivision to grant a request for rezoning when a person submits a request for a change to a zoning classification of land that is required to proceed with a residential housing development and all of the following apply:
1. The proposed change is for an area identified in the political subdivision’s comprehensive plan as projected for residential land use.
2. The area is contiguous with existing development.
3. The proposed minimum and maximum net density of residences in the residential housing development are within the minimum and maximum net density for the area specified by the political subdivision in its comprehensive plan or the political subdivision has failed to comply with the requirement created in the bill to specify the minimum and maximum net density in the area.
4. Current housing supply in the political subdivision does not meet existing housing demand or forecasted housing demand within the next five years, as provided in the comprehensive plan.
The bill provides that a political subdivision may refuse to grant a request meeting these requirements if the political subdivision demonstrates that the denial is necessary either 1) to prevent a shortage in, or the overburdening of, public facilities located in the political subdivision or 2) to address a significant threat to public health or safety.
The bill provides an exception to this mandatory rezoning procedure upon the failure of certain attempts to develop properties within a political subdivision. Specifically, if a political subdivision requests proposals for certain residential development and no proposals are received, the mandatory rezoning procedure created in the bill does not apply in that political subdivision for one year after the last date on which responses to the request were to be accepted.
The bill also specifies that a person who enforces the requirements of the bill by a mandamus action may recover any court costs and reasonable attorney fees attributable to the failure to approve the request within 60 days.
Comprehensive planning
Under current law, unless certain conditions apply, certain ordinances enacted or amended by a political subdivision that affect land use must be consistent with that political subdivision’s comprehensive plan. The ordinances to which this requirement applies are official mapping, local subdivision regulation, and zoning ordinances. Also under current law, if a political subdivision enacts or amends any of these ordinances, the comprehensive plan must contain at least all of the required planning elements. The required planning elements include the following: housing; transportation; utilities and community facilities; agricultural, natural, and cultural resources; economic development; land use; and intergovernmental cooperation.
The bill requires political subdivisions to identify in their comprehensive plans the areas in which residential land use is projected and, for each of these areas, to specify the minimum and maximum net density of residences that will be authorized. These projections and authorized densities must be provided for five-year increments over 20 years. Political subdivisions must ensure that their comprehensive plans satisfy this requirement if, after the effective date of the bill, the political subdivision enacts or amends an official mapping ordinance, local subdivision ordinance, or zoning ordinance or adds lands by annexation or consolidation intended for residential development. In addition, if a person requests rezoning or the approval of a permit related to residential housing development, the political subdivision must amend its comprehensive plan within 180 days to satisfy the residential use and density specification requirement.
If a person requests rezoning for a residential housing development and the political subdivision has not complied with the residential use and density specification requirement, the bill provides that the land is either rezoned to the person’s requested zoning classification or that certain dimensional, physical, and location requirements requested by the person or the least restrictive dimensional, physical, and location requirements in the political subdivision’s zoning ordinance for any residential classification apply.
TIF generally
Under current law, cities and villages may use tax incremental financing (TIF) to encourage development in the city or village. In general, under TIF, a city or village pays for improvements in a TID and then collects tax moneys attributable to all taxing jurisdictions on the increased property value in the TID for a certain period of time to pay for the improvements. Ideally, after that period of time, the city or village will have been repaid for its initial investment and the property tax base in the TID will have permanently increased in value.
In general and in brief, a city or village makes use of TIF using the following procedure:
1. The city or village designates an area as a TID and creates a project plan laying out the expenditures that the city or village will make within the TID, and the designation and project plan are approved by representatives of the other taxing jurisdictions (joint review board).
2. The Department of Revenue establishes the “base value” of the TID. This value is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation.
3. Each year thereafter, the “value increment” of the property within the TID is determined by subtracting the base value from the current value of property within the TID. The portion of taxes collected on any positive value increment (the tax increment) is collected by the city or village for use solely for the project costs of the TID. Tax increments collected by the city or village include taxes that would have been collected by other taxing jurisdictions, such as counties or school districts, if the TID had not been created.
4. Tax increments are collected until the city or village has recovered all of its project costs or until the TID reaches its statutory termination date.
Extending the life of a TID for housing stock purposes
Currently, a city or village may extend the life of a TID for up to one year for housing stock improvement if all of the following occur:
1. The city or village pays off all of the TID’s project costs.
2. The city or village adopts a resolution stating that it intends to extend the life of the TID, the number of months it intends to do so, and how it intends to improve housing stock.
3. The city or village notifies DOR.
Current law requires the city or village to use 75 percent of the tax increments received during the period specified in the resolution to benefit affordable housing in the city or village and 25 percent to otherwise improve the city’s or village’s housing stock.
Under the bill, a TID’s life may be extended for up to two years for housing stock improvement. Also, under the bill, all tax increments for housing stock improvement must be expended to purchase goods or services from for-profit entities.
Expenditures for residential development
Under current law, the project costs of a TID must be enumerated in the TID’s project plan. These project costs are the expenditures that the city or village expects to make in carrying out the project plan. Current law limits the types of expenditures that may be included as project costs. For example, public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; and site preparation costs may be included. The costs of constructing administrative buildings, for example, may not.
Generally, under current law, project costs may, under certain circumstances, include expenditures for newly platted residential development. Currently, such expenditures may qualify as project costs only in TIDs for which a project plan was approved before September 30, 1995, or for mixed-use TIDs. With regard to a mixed-use TID, such expenditures qualify only if certain density or development quality standards are also satisfied.
The bill defines “newly platted residential development” as residential development on a parcel that has not previously been the site of permanent structures other than structures used solely for agricultural purposes.
Because this bill may increase or decrease, directly or indirectly, the cost of the development, construction, financing, purchasing, sale, ownership, or availability of housing in this state, the Department of Administration, as required by law, will prepare a report to be printed as an appendix to this bill.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SB472,1
1
Section

1
.
59.69 (3) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB472,2,16
2
59.69
(3)
(a) The county zoning agency may direct the preparation of a county
3
development plan or parts of the plan for the physical development of the
4
unincorporated territory within the county and areas within incorporated
5
jurisdictions whose governing bodies by resolution agree to having their areas
6
included in the county’s development plan. The plan may be adopted in whole or in
7
part and may be amended by the board and endorsed by the governing bodies of
8
incorporated jurisdictions included in the plan. The county development plan, in
9
whole or in part, in its original form or as amended, is hereafter referred to as the
10
development plan. To the extent that the development plan applies to
11
unincorporated areas of a county with the population described in s. 60.23 (34), it
12
applies only to those unincorporated areas that are subject to county zoning.
13
Beginning on January 1, 2010,
or, if the county is exempt under s. 66.1001 (3m), the
14
date under s. 66.1001 (3m) (b),
if the county engages in any program or action
15
described in s. 66.1001 (3), the development plan shall contain at least all of the
16
elements specified in s. 66.1001 (2).
SB472,2
17
Section

2
.
62.23 (3) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB472,3,16
18
62.23
(3)
(b) The commission may adopt the master plan as a whole by a
19
single resolution, or, as the work of making the whole master plan progresses, may
20
from time to time by resolution adopt a part or parts of a master plan. Beginning on
1
January 1, 2010,
or, if the city is exempt under s. 66.1001 (3m), the date under s.
2
66.1001 (3m) (b),
if the city engages in any program or action described in s. 66.1001
3
(3), the master plan shall contain at least all of the elements specified in s. 66.1001
4
(2). The adoption of the plan or any part, amendment, or addition, shall be by
5
resolution carried by the affirmative votes of not less than a majority of all the
6
members of the city plan commission. The resolution shall refer expressly to the
7
elements under s. 66.1001 and other matters intended by the commission to form
8
the whole or any part of the plan, and the action taken shall be recorded on the
9
adopted plan or part of the plan by the identifying signature of the secretary of the
10
commission, and a copy of the plan or part of the plan shall be certified to the
11
common council, and also to the commanding officer, or the officer’s designee, of any
12
military base or installation, with at least 200 assigned military personnel or that
13
contains at least 2,000 acres, that is located in or near the city. The purpose and
14
effect of the adoption and certifying of the master plan or part of the plan shall be
15
solely to aid the city plan commission and the council in the performance of their
16
duties.
SB472,3
17
Section

3
.
66.1001 (1) (am) of the statutes is repealed.
SB472,4
18
Section

4
.
66.1001 (2) (h) of the statutes is renumbered 66.1001 (2) (h)
19
(intro.) and amended to read:
SB472,4,3
20
66.1001
(2)
(h)
Land-use element.
(intro.) A compilation of objectives,
21
policies, goals, maps
,
and programs to guide the future development and
22
redevelopment of public and private property.
In this paragraph, determinations of
23
the net density of lands shall exclude only those portions of the lands that are
24
wetlands, that are included in a 100-year floodplain, or that are owned by the
1
federal government, a local governmental unit, as defined in s. 20.931 (1) (a), or a
2
state agency, as defined in s. 20.931 (1) (c), and are not intended for redevelopment.

3
The element shall
contain

do all of the following:
SB472,4,7
4
1. Contain
a listing of the amount, type, intensity
,
and net density of existing
5
uses of land in the local governmental unit, such as agricultural, residential,
6
commercial, industrial
,
and other public and private uses.
The element shall
7
analyze
SB472,4,10
8
2. Analyze
trends in the supply, demand
,
and price of land, opportunities for
9
redevelopment
,
and existing and potential land-use conflicts.
The element shall
10
contain
SB472,4,15
11
3. Contain
projections, based on the background information specified in par.
12
(a), for 20 years, in 5-year increments, of future residential, agricultural,
13
commercial
,
and industrial land uses including the assumptions of net densities or
14
other spatial assumptions upon which the projections are based.
The element shall
15
also include
SB472,4,22
16
5. Include
a series of maps that shows current land uses and future land uses
17
that indicate productive agricultural soils, natural limitations for building site
18
development, floodplains, wetlands and other environmentally sensitive lands, the
19
boundaries of areas to which services of public utilities and community facilities, as
20
those terms are used in par. (d), will be provided in the future, consistent with the
21
timetable described in par. (d), and the general location of future land uses by net
22
density or other classifications.
SB472,5
23
Section

5
.
66.1001 (2) (h) 4. of the statutes is created to read:

Down

Down

/2025/related/proposals/sb472

true

proposaltext

/2025/related/proposals/sb472

proposaltext/2025/REG/SB472

proposaltext/2025/REG/SB472

section

true

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
SB472: Bill Text

×

Details for

PDF view

Link
(Permanent link)

Bookmark this location

View toggle

Go to top of document

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Search in this agency

Search in this chapter group

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Cross references for section

Acts affecting this section

References to this

1970 Statutes Annotations

Appellate Court Citations

Administrative Code Index

Reference lines

Clear highlighting