Read the full stored bill text
Wisconsin Legislature: SB497: Bill Text
Skip navigation
Home
Documents
Senate
Assembly
Committees
Service Agencies
Docs
Options
Help
2025 Biennium
Statutes
Admin. Rules
Indices
Miscellaneous
Archives
Home
Bill, Rule, and Appointment Histories
Senators
Representatives
Committees
Text of Introduced Proposals
Amendment Text
Acts
Veto Messages
Enrolled Bills
Votes
Assembly and Senate Floor Calendars
Schedule of Committee Activities
Assembly and Senate Journals
Committee Records (ROCPs)
Legislative Rules
All Session-Related Documents
Subject Index to Acts
Subject Index to Legislation
Subject Index to Journals
Author Index to Legislation
Subject Index to Clearinghouse Rules
Miscellaneous Budget Documents
Executive Orders
Rulings of the Chair
Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules
Opinions of the Attorney General
Town Law Forms
Law
Districts
Session
Drafting Files
Feeds
Preferences
Show tree
Hide tree
Feedback
Help
Home
Senate Home
Senators
Committees
Session
Chief Clerk
Sergeant at Arms
Civics Education
Human Resources
Assembly Home
Representatives
Committees
Session
Chief Clerk
Sergeant at Arms
Human Resources
Schedule
Joint
Senate
Assembly
Study
Legislative Audit Bureau
Legislative Council
Legislative Fiscal Bureau
Legislative Human Resources Office
Legislative Reference Bureau
Legislative Technology Services Bureau
Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
SB497: Bill Text
Up
Up
2025 - 2026 LEGISLATURE
LRB-4779/1
EVM:cdc
2025 SENATE BILL 497
October 2, 2025 - Introduced by Senators
Feyen
,
Nass
and
Wanggaard
, cosponsored by Representatives
Goeben
,
O'Connor
,
Doyle
,
B. Jacobson
,
Kreibich
,
Melotik
,
Mursau
,
Penterman
,
Spiros
and
Murphy
. Referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government.
SB497,1,8
1
An Act
to renumber and amend
32.05 (2) (b) and 84.30 (5r) (a);
to amend
2
32.05 (3) (e), 84.30 (5r) (title), 84.30 (5r) (c), 84.30 (5r) (d) and 84.30 (8);
to
3
repeal and recreate
84.30 (5r) (b);
to create
32.05 (2) (b) 2., 32.09 (6m),
4
84.30 (5r) (a) 1., 84.30 (5r) (a) 2., 84.30 (5r) (a) 3., 84.30 (5r) (a) 4., 84.30 (5r)
5
(bs), 84.30 (5r) (cm), 84.30 (7) (c) and 84.30 (8m) of the statutes;
relating to:
6
outdoor advertising signs that do not conform to local ordinances and that are
7
affected by certain transportation-related projects; compensation for takings
8
of signs, and appraisals upon which jurisdictional offers are based.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill revises the standards governing the treatment of outdoor advertising signs that do not conform to local ordinances (nonconforming signs) and that are affected by certain transportation-related public projects, prohibits the use of the “unit rule” in the condemnation of signs, and limits the use of certain appraisals as the basis for a jurisdictional offer.
Under current law, if a highway project of the Department of Transportation causes the realignment of a nonconforming sign, the realignment does not affect the sign’s nonconforming status under the ordinance. “Realignment” is defined as relocation on the same site. Also under current law, if DOT proposes the realignment of a sign in connection with a highway project, DOT must notify the municipality or county that adopted the ordinance to which the nonconforming sign does not conform of the sign’s proposed realignment. The municipality or county may then petition DOT to condemn the sign instead of realigning the sign, but must pay DOT for certain costs of condemnation if DOT succeeds in condemning the sign.
This bill expands the types of projects covered and replaces the realignment provision with a repositioning provision. Under this bill, if a state or local transportation project for which DOT has allocated state or federal funds (covered project) causes the removal or reduces the visibility of a nonconforming sign, the sign’s nonconforming status under the ordinance is not affected if the sign is repositioned within the political subdivision in a manner approved by the political subdivision. Repositioning under the bill means raising, lowering, rotating, or adjusting the sign or moving the sign to another location. In general, the bill requires that the characteristics of a nonconforming sign be the same after repositioning as before repositioning. If a sign is repositioned, the agency undertaking the covered project must pay to the sign owner the actual replacement costs incurred by the sign owner in repositioning the sign. The bill requires that replacement costs be determined by using the moving cost agreement for the relocation of outdoor advertising signs.
Also under this bill, the agency that undertakes a covered project proposes the repositioning a nonconforming sign in connection with the project, that agency must notify the municipality or county that adopted the ordinance to which the sign does not conform of the sign’s proposed repositioning. The municipality or county may then petition the agency to condemn the sign instead of repositioning, but must pay the agency for certain costs of condemnation if the agency succeeds in condemning the sign.
This bill also prohibits the use of the “unit rule” in the condemnation of signs. In general, for properties owned by multiple parties, the “unit rule” limits the liability of a condemnor to the fair market value of the property taken, notwithstanding the potential loss in property value to the separate parties. This bill provides that, for signs, a condemnor must pay values for 1) the value of the sign and any lease related to the sign, 2) the loss in value to other signs of the owner caused by the removal of the sign, and 3) with regard to the owner of the real property on which the sign is located, the loss of the right to erect and maintain the sign. The bill specifically provides that these amounts are not limited to the fair market value of the property as an undivided whole.
This bill also prohibits a condemnor from using as an appraisal upon which a jurisdictional offer is based any appraisal in which the amount of the owner’s appraised loss is less than 85 percent or more than 115 percent of the amount of the owner’s loss provided in the jurisdictional offer.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SB497,1
1
Section
1
.
32.05 (2) (b) of the statutes is renumbered 32.05 (2) (b) 1. (intro.)
2
and amended to read:
SB497,2,4
3
32.05
(2)
(b) 1. (intro.) The condemnor shall provide the owner with
a
all of
4
the following:
SB497,2,5
5
a. A
full narrative appraisal upon which the jurisdictional offer is based
and a
.
SB497,2,7
6
b. A
copy of any other appraisal made under par. (a)
and at the same time
7
shall inform the owner of his or her
.
SB497,2,9
8
c. A notification of the
right to obtain an appraisal under
this paragraph
subd.
9
3
.
SB497,2,16
10
3.
The owner may obtain an appraisal by a qualified appraiser of all property
11
proposed to be acquired, and may submit the reasonable costs of the appraisal to
12
the condemnor for payment. The owner shall submit a full narrative appraisal to
13
the condemnor within 60 days after the owner receives the condemnor’s appraisal.
14
If the owner does not accept a negotiated offer under sub. (2a) or the jurisdictional
15
offer under sub. (3), the owner may use an appraisal prepared under this paragraph
16
in any subsequent appeal.
SB497,2
17
Section
2
.
32.05 (2) (b) 2. of the statutes is created to read:
SB497,3,2
18
32.05
(2)
(b) 2. An appraisal in which the amount of the owner’s appraised
19
loss is less than 85 percent or more than 115 percent of the amount of the owner’s
1
loss provided in the jurisdictional offer is not an appraisal upon which the
2
jurisdictional offer is based within the meaning of subd. 1. a.
SB497,3
3
Section
3
.
32.05 (3) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB497,3,10
4
32.05
(3)
(e) Stating that the appraisal or one of the appraisals of the property
5
on which condemnor’s offer is based is available for inspection at a specified place
6
by persons having an interest in the lands sought to be acquired.
An appraisal in
7
which the amount of the owner’s appraised loss is less than 85 percent or more than
8
115 percent of the amount of the owner’s loss provided in the jurisdictional offer is
9
not an appraisal upon which the jurisdictional offer is based within the meaning of
10
this paragraph.
SB497,4
11
Section
4
.
32.09 (6m) of the statutes is created to read:
SB497,3,14
12
32.09
(6m)
In the taking of a sign, as defined in s. 84.30 (2) (j), all of the
13
following apply, regardless of whether the sign is considered a legally permitted
14
sign or a nonconforming sign under s. 84.30:
SB497,3,17
15
(a) For a sign owned by someone other than the owner of the fee property, the
16
compensation paid by the condemnor is not limited to the compensation for the
17
undivided value of the property as a whole.
SB497,3,18
18
(b) The owners of the property interest taken shall be paid all of the following:
SB497,3,19
19
1. The value of the sign and any lease related to the sign.
SB497,3,20
20
2. Loss in value to other signs of the owner caused by the removal of the sign.
SB497,3,22
21
3. With regard to the owner of the real property on which the sign is located,
22
the loss of the right to erect and maintain the sign.
SB497,4,9
23
(c) Compensation required under par. (b) shall be paid to the person entitled
24
thereto. The just compensation payable under par. (b) 1. and 2. shall be paid
1
directly to the owner of such removed sign and the just compensation payable under
2
par. (b) 3. shall be paid directly to the owner of the real property on which the sign
3
is located. If the condemnor and the owner reach agreement on the amount of
4
compensation payable to such owner in respect to any removal or relocation, the
5
condemnor may pay such compensation to the owner and thereby require or
6
terminate the owner’s rights or interests by purchase. If the condemnor and the
7
owner do not reach agreement as to such amount of compensation, the condemnor
8
or owner may institute an action to have such compensation determined under s.
9
32.05.
SB497,4,16
10
(d) If the condemnor and the owner do not reach agreement as to such amount
11
of compensation, the condemnor and one or more owners may institute an action to
12
have such compensation determined under s. 32.05. Notwithstanding the language
13
included in s. 32.05, separate appeals may be filed and maintained under that
14
section in relation to the compensation payable under par. (b). A successful owner
15
litigant under this subsection shall be entitled to recover litigation expenses
16
provided that the owner satisfies the requirements of s. 32.28 (3).
SB497,5
17
Section
5
.
84.30 (5r) (title) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB497,4,19
18
84.30
(5r)
(title)
Signs nonconforming under local ordinances that are
19
realigned because of state
affected by certain
highway projects.
SB497,6
20
Section
6
.
84.30 (5r) (a) of the statutes is renumbered 84.30 (5r) (a) (intro.)
21
and amended to read:
SB497,4,23
22
84.30
(5r)
(a) (intro.) In this subsection
, “realignment” means relocation on
23
the same site.
:
SB497,7
24
Section
7
.
84.30 (5r) (a) 1. of the statutes is created to read:
SB497,5,3
1
84.30
(5r)
(a) 1. “Covered project” means a highway project undertaken by the
2
department or a political subdivision for which the department has allocated state
3
or federal funds.
SB497,8
4
Section
8
.
84.30 (5r) (a) 2. of the statutes is created to read:
SB497,5,7
5
84.30
(5r)
(a) 2. “Lead agency” means the department, for a highway project
6
undertaken by the department, or the political subdivision, for a highway project
7
undertaken by a political subdivision.
SB497,9
8
Section
9
.
84.30 (5r) (a) 3. of the statutes is created to read:
SB497,5,9
9
84.30
(5r)
(a) 3. “Political subdivision” means a city, village, town, or county.
SB497,10
10
Section
10
.
84.30 (5r) (a) 4. of the statutes is created to read:
SB497,5,12
11
84.30
(5r)
(a) 4. “Reposition” means to raise, lower, rotate, or adjust or to move
12
to another location.
SB497,11
13
Section
11
.
84.30 (5r) (b) of the statutes is repealed and recreated to read:
SB497,5,18
14
84.30
(5r)
(b) If a sign does not conform to an ordinance of a political
15
subdivision and a covered project causes the removal of the sign or reduces the
16
visibility of the sign, the sign’s nonconforming status under the ordinance is not
17
affected if the sign is repositioned in the political subdivision in any manner
18
approved by the political subdivision.
SB497,12
19
Section
12
.
84.30 (5r) (bs) of the statutes is created to read:
SB497,5,21
20
84.30
(5r)
(bs) All of the following apply to a sign that is repositioned under
21
this subsection:
SB497,5,23
22
1. The size of the sign face and the number of sign faces on the sign after
23
repositioning shall be the same as on the sign before repositioning.
SB497,6,4
1
2. a. The height of the sign after repositioning may be different than the
2
height of the sign before repositioning, but only to the extent necessary to provide
3
substantially the same view of the sign from the roadway from which motorists are
4
intended to view the sign as it existed before the covered project.
SB497,6,8
5
b. If the height of a sign is increased due to a covered project and the impact of
6
the covered project on the sign terminates upon the completion of the covered
7
project, a political subdivision may require a sign owner to reduce the height of a
8
sign to its original height after the covered project is completed.
SB497,6,11
9
c. This section does not prohibit a political subdivision from requiring that a
10
repositioned sign comply with an ordinance that establishes a maximum height of
11
the sign.
SB497,6,14
12
3. Except as provided in subds. 1. and 2., the characteristics of the sign after
13
repositioning shall be the same as the characteristics of the sign before
14
repositioning.
Down
Down
/2025/related/proposals/sb497
true
proposaltext
/2025/related/proposals/sb497
proposaltext/2025/REG/SB497
proposaltext/2025/REG/SB497
section
true
Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
SB497: Bill Text
×
Details for
PDF view
Link
(Permanent link)
Bookmark this location
View toggle
Go to top of document
Search in this chapter
Search in this section
Search in this agency
Search in this chapter group
Search in this chapter
Search in this section
Cross references for section
Acts affecting this section
References to this
1970 Statutes Annotations
Appellate Court Citations
Administrative Code Index
Reference lines
Clear highlighting