Back to Wisconsin

SJR116 • 2025

prohibiting the governor from using the partial veto to create or increase any tax or fee (second consideration)

prohibiting the governor from using the partial veto to create or increase any tax or fee (second consideration)

Taxes
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Senators Kapenga, Bradley, Feyen, Hutton, Nass, Tomczyk and Wanggaard, cosponsored by Representatives Nedweski, Knodl, Kitchens, Sortwell, Allen, August, Behnke, Callahan, Dittrich, Donovan, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, Gustafson, B. Jacobson, Kreibich, Kurtz, Maxey, Moses, Murphy, Penterman, Steffen, Swearingen, Tucker, Tusler and Wichgers
Last action
2026-06-23
Official status
S - Enrolled
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

prohibiting the governor from using the partial veto to create or increase any tax or fee (second consideration)

prohibiting the governor from using the partial veto to create or increase any tax or fee (second consideration) Status: S - Enrolled

What This Bill Does

  • prohibiting the governor from using the partial veto to create or increase any tax or fee (second consideration) Status: S - Enrolled

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-06-23 Sen.

    Published 6-23-2026. Enrolled Joint Resolution 14

  2. 2026-03-30 Sen.

    Deposited in the office of the Secretary of State on 3-30-2026

  3. 2026-03-19 Sen.

    Report correctly enrolled

  4. 2026-03-17 Sen.

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  5. 2026-03-17 Sen.

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  6. 2026-03-16 Sen.

    Placed on calendar 3-17-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  7. 2026-02-23 Sen.

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 adopted

  8. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Haywood

  9. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Haywood

  10. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Read a second time

  11. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 offered by Representative Nedweski

  12. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 adopted

  13. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Rules suspended

  15. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 is not properly before the Assembly

  16. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Point of Order Not Well Taken

  17. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Decision of the Chair appealed

  18. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 54, Noes 41

  19. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 54, Noes 41

  20. 2026-02-19 Asm.

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. 2026-02-18 Asm.

    Referred to committee on Rules

  22. 2026-02-18 Asm.

    Made a special order of business at 11:01 AM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14

  23. 2026-01-22 Asm.

    Received from Senate

  24. 2026-01-21 Sen.

    Read a second time

  25. 2026-01-21 Sen.

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. 2026-01-21 Sen.

    Rules suspended to give joint resolution its third reading

  27. 2026-01-21 Sen.

    Read a third time and adopted, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  28. 2026-01-21 Sen.

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. 2026-01-16 Sen.

    Placed on calendar 1-21-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  30. 2026-01-09 Sen.

    Executive action taken

  31. 2026-01-09 Sen.

    Report adoption recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs , Ayes 3, Noes 2

  32. 2026-01-09 Sen.

    Available for scheduling

  33. 2026-01-07 Sen.

    Public hearing held

  34. 2025-12-30 Sen.

    Introduced by Senators Kapenga , Bradley , Feyen , Hutton , Nass , Tomczyk and Wanggaard ; cosponsored by Representatives Nedweski , Knodl , Kitchens , Sortwell , Allen , August , Behnke , Callahan , Dittrich , Donovan , Goeben , Green , Gundrum , Gustafson , B. Jacobson , Kreibich , Kurtz , Maxey , Moses , Murphy , Penterman , Steffen , Swearingen , Tucker , Tusler , Wichgers and Armstrong

  35. 2025-12-30 Sen.

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs

Official Summary Text

prohibiting the governor from using the partial veto to create or increase any tax or fee (second consideration)
Status: S - Enrolled

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Wisconsin Legislature: SJR116: Joint Resolution Text

Skip navigation

Home

Documents

Senate

Assembly

Committees

Service Agencies

Docs

Options

Help

2025 Biennium

Statutes

Admin. Rules

Indices

Miscellaneous

Archives

Home

Bill, Rule, and Appointment Histories

Senators

Representatives

Committees

Text of Introduced Proposals

Amendment Text

Acts

Veto Messages

Enrolled Bills

Votes

Assembly and Senate Floor Calendars

Schedule of Committee Activities

Assembly and Senate Journals

Committee Records (ROCPs)

Legislative Rules

All Session-Related Documents

Subject Index to Acts

Subject Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Journals

Author Index to Legislation

Subject Index to Clearinghouse Rules

Miscellaneous Budget Documents

Executive Orders

Rulings of the Chair

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules

Opinions of the Attorney General

Town Law Forms

Law

Districts

Session

Drafting Files

Feeds

Preferences

Show tree

Hide tree

Feedback

Help

Home

Senate Home

Senators

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Civics Education

Human Resources
Assembly Home

Representatives

Committees

Session

Chief Clerk

Sergeant at Arms

Human Resources
Schedule

Joint

Senate

Assembly

Study
Legislative Audit Bureau

Legislative Council

Legislative Fiscal Bureau

Legislative Human Resources Office

Legislative Reference Bureau

Legislative Technology Services Bureau

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
SJR116: Joint Resolution Text

Up

Up

2025 - 2026 LEGISLATURE
LRB-5785/1
MPG:cdc
2025 SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 116
December 30, 2025 - Introduced by Senators
Kapenga
,
Bradley
,
Feyen
,
Hutton
,
Nass
,
Tomczyk
and
Wanggaard
, cosponsored by Representatives
Nedweski
,
Knodl
,
Kitchens
,
Sortwell
,
Allen
,
August
,
Behnke
,
Callahan
,
Dittrich
,
Donovan
,
Goeben
,
Green
,
Gundrum
,
Gustafson
,
B. Jacobson
,
Kreibich
,
Kurtz
,
Maxey
,
Moses
,
Murphy
,
Penterman
,
Steffen
,
Swearingen
,
Tucker
,
Tusler
and
Wichgers
. Referred to Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs.
SJR116,1,3
1
To amend
section 10 (1) (c) of article V of the constitution;
relating to:
prohibiting
2
the governor from using the partial veto to create or increase any tax or fee
3
(second consideration).
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau

EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL

This proposed constitutional amendment, to be given second consideration by the 2025 legislature for submittal to the voters in November 2026, was first considered by the 2023 legislature in 2023 Assembly Joint Resolution 112, which became 2023 Enrolled Joint Resolution 16.
This constitutional amendment provides that the governor, in exercising his or her partial veto power over an appropriation bill, may not create or increase or authorize the creation or increase of any tax or fee.

Currently, in exercising the partial veto power, the governor is limited only in that he or she may not create a new word by rejecting individual letters in the words of the enrolled bill and may not create a new sentence by combining parts of two or more sentences of the enrolled bill. In
Bartlett v. Ever
s, 2020 WI 68, the Wisconsin Supreme Court further restricted the governor’s partial veto power, but there was no agreement by the court on the reasons for the new restrictions. The new restriction on the governor’s partial veto power contained in the amendment is in addition to the current restrictions in the constitution.

PROCEDURE FOR SECOND CONSIDERATION

When a proposed constitutional amendment is before the legislature on second consideration, any change in the text approved by the preceding legislature causes the proposed constitutional amendment to revert to first consideration status so that second consideration approval would have to be given by the next legislature before the proposal may be submitted to the people for ratification [see joint rule 57 (2)].

If the legislature approves a proposed constitutional amendment on second consideration, it must also set the date for submitting the proposed constitutional amendment to the people for ratification and must determine the question or questions to appear on the ballot.
SJR116,2,5
1
Whereas, the 2023 legislature in regular session considered a proposed
2
amendment to the constitution in 2023 Assembly Joint Resolution 112, which
3
became 2023 Enrolled Joint Resolution 16, and agreed to it by a majority of the
4
members elected to each of the two houses, which proposed amendment reads as
5
follows:
SJR116,1
Section
1
.
Section 10 (1) (c) of article V of the constitution is amended to read:
[Article V] Section 10 (1) (c) In approving an appropriation bill in part, the governor may not create a new word by rejecting individual letters in the words of the enrolled bill,
and
may not create a new sentence by combining parts of 2 or more sentences of the enrolled bill
, and may not create or increase or authorize the creation or increase of any tax or fee
.
SJR116,3,2
6
Now, therefore, be it resolved by the
senate
, the
assembly
concurring,
7
That
the foregoing proposed amendment to the constitution is agreed to by the
8
2025 legislature; and, be it further
9

Resolved, That
the foregoing proposed amendment to the constitution be
10
submitted to a vote of the people at the election to be held on the first Tuesday of
11
November 2026; and, be it further
1

Resolved, That
the questions concerning ratification of the foregoing
2
proposed amendment to the constitution be stated on the ballot as follows:
SJR116,3,6
3
Question

1
:
“
Partial veto.
Shall section 10 (1) (c) of article V of the
4
constitution be amended to prohibit the governor, in exercising his or her partial
5
veto authority, from creating or increasing or authorizing the creation or increase of
6
any tax or fee?”
SJR116,3,7
7
(end)

Down

Down

/2025/related/proposals/sjr116

true

proposaltext

/2025/related/proposals/sjr116

proposaltext/2025/REG/SJR116

proposaltext/2025/REG/SJR116

section

true

Menu
»
2025
»
Related Documents
»
Proposal Text
»
SJR116: Joint Resolution Text

×

Details for

PDF view

Link
(Permanent link)

Bookmark this location

View toggle

Go to top of document

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Search in this agency

Search in this chapter group

Search in this chapter

Search in this section

Cross references for section

Acts affecting this section

References to this

1970 Statutes Annotations

Appellate Court Citations

Administrative Code Index

Reference lines

Clear highlighting