Plain English Breakdown
The plain English breakdown is still being put together. The official documents below are already here.
Straight-ahead summaries built from the official bill text. We keep the source links front and center and leave the decision up to you.
HJ0003 • 2011
A JOINT RESOLUTION demanding Congress cease and desist from enacting mandates beyond the enumerated powers granted to the Congress by the United States Constitution; calling on Congress to amend the tenth amendment and the interstate commerce clause in article 1, section 8 of the United States Constitution so as to restrict the egregious encroachment on states' rights through federal legislation and federal court decisions; and demanding that the United States Supreme Court refrain from issuing decisions which impermissibly expand federal power or restrict individual rights.
The latest official action shows that this bill did not move forward in that session.
The plain English breakdown is still being put together. The official documents below are already here.
S Placed on General File; Did Not Consider in CoW
S03 Recommended Do Pass
S Introduced and Referred to S03
S Received for Introduction
H Passed 3rd Reading
H Passed 2nd Reading
H Passed CoW
H Placed on General File
H01 Recommended Do Pass
H Introduced and Referred to H01
H Received for Introduction
Bill Number Assigned
WORKING DRAFT 2011 STATE OF WYOMING 11LSO-0444 HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. HJ0003 Resolution to Congress and the United States Supreme Court . Sponsored by: Representative(s) Childers, Buchanan, Jaggi, Krone, McOmie and Shepperson and Senator(s) Case, Coe and Jennings A BILL for A JOINT RESOLUTION demanding Congress cease and desist from enacting mandates beyond the enumerated powers granted to the Congress by the United States Constitution; calling on Congress to amend the tenth amendment and the interstate commerce clause in article 1, section 8 of the United States Constitution so as to restrict the egregious encroachmen t on state s ' rights through federal legislation and federal court decisions ; and demanding that the United States Supreme Court refrain from issuing decisions which impermissibly expand federal power or restrict individual rights . WHEREAS, the tenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."; and WHEREAS, the tenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and WHEREAS, the scope of the power defined by the tenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and WHEREAS, the states, through enactment of federal legislation and federal court decisions, are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and WHEREAS, the tenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States assures that we, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the union of states, now have, and have always had, rights the federal government may not usurp; and WHEREAS, many powers assumed by the federal governm ent and federal mandates , and upheld by the federal courts , are directly in violation of the tenth amendment to the United States Constitution; and WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court and the lower federal courts have upheld federal laws as constitutional exercises of Congressional authority which egregiously encroach and unconstitutionally contract sta tes' rights in direct contradiction to the t enth amendment in such cases as Helvering v. Davis , 301 U.S. 619 (U.S. 1937) ; and WHEREAS, the interstate commerce clause in article 1, section 8 of the Constitution of the United States provides that Congress shall have the power: "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with Indian Tribes;" and WHEREAS, the interstate commerce clause is limited to the federal government regulating trade between the states and between the states and other nations, to help prevent conflicts between states over commercial activities and to prevent the erection of barriers to commerce between the states; and WHEREAS, the interstate commerce clause should not be used to provide Congress with authority to regulate matters that are primarily intrastate with only an insignificant or collateral effect upon interstate commerce; and WHEREAS, many federal laws are beyond the scope and intent of the interstate commerce clause to the Constitution of the United States ; and WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court and the lower federal courts have upheld federal laws as constitutional exercises of Congressional authority under the interstate commerce clause when those federal laws clearly exceeded the limited scope of the interstate co mmerce clause in such cases as Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942 ) and United States v. Carolene Products Co. , 304 U.S. 144 ( U.S. 1938 ); and WHEREAS, article 1, section 1 of the Constitution of the United States mandates that "[a]ll legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States…"; and WHEREAS, Congress has violated the provisions of article 1, section 1 of the Constitution of the United States by unlawfully delegating their legislative authority to enact laws to federal agencies; and WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court and the lower federal courts have upheld federal laws which unlawfully delegate Congress's authority to enact laws to federal agencies in violation of article 1, section 1 of the Constitution of the United States in such cases as Whitman v. American Trucking Assns. , Inc. , 531 U.S. 457 (2001) ; and WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court and the lower federal courts have impermissibly upheld laws and actions which violate an American citizen's right to bear arms as guaranteed by the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States in such cases as United States v. Miller , 307 U.S. 174 ( 1939) ; and WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court and the lower federal courts have upheld laws and actions which impermissibly impaired a private individual's obligations under a contract in direct violation of the contract clause of article 1 , section 10 of the Constitution of the United States in such cases as Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell , 290 U.S. 398 (1934) ; and WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court and the lower federal courts have upheld laws and actions which unc onstitutionally encroach on private property rights without due process and just compensation in violation of the fifth and fourteenth amendments to the Constitution of the United States in such cases as Kelo v. City of New London , 545 U.S. 469 ( 2005) and Penn Central Transport. Co. v. New York City , 438 U.S. 104 (1978) ; and WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court and the lower federal courts have upheld laws and actions which unconstitutionally seize private property without due process of law in violation of the fourth, fifth and fourteenth amendments to the Constitution of the United States in such cases as Bennis v. Michigan , 516 U.S. 442 ( 1996) ; and WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court and the lower federal courts have upheld laws and actions which unconstitutionally deny an individual equal protection of the laws based on that individual ' s race or ethnicity in violation of the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment in such cases as Grutter v. Bollinger , 539 U.S. 306 (2003) ; and WHEREAS, Congress may not commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states , and the United States Supreme Court and the lower federal courts may not simply turn a blind eye to the unconstitutional expansion of federal power and restriction of individual rights . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WYOMING : Section 1. That the Wyoming Congressional delegation and Congress take action to initiate the amendment process provided by article 5 of the Constitution of the United States to amend the tenth amendment and article 1, section 8 (the interstate commerce clause) of the Constitution of the United States. Section 2. That Congress amend the tenth amendment of the Constitution of the United States as follows, with proposed changes indicated in underscored text: The powers not expressly delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. This amendment shall be considered by all courts as a rule of interpretation and construction in any case involving an interpretation of any constitutional power claimed by the Congress. Section 3. That Congress amend the interstate commerce clause, article 1 , section 8 of the Constitution of the United States as follows, with proposed changes indicated in underscored text: To directly regulate Commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes , with no authority in Congress to regulate matters that are primarily intrastate with only an insignificant or collateral effect upon interstate commerce ; Section 4. That Congress shall specify that the amendments to the tenth amendment and the interstate commerce clause, article 1 , section 8 of the Constitution of the United States, as provided herein, shall be operative upon ratification by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states, provided that such ratification shall occur within seven years from the date of the submission of the amendments to the states by Congress. Section 5 . That this state calls on its costates for an expression of their sentiments on the need to amend the tenth amendment and article 1, section 8 of the Constitution of the United States and that the United States Supreme Court refrain from issuing decisions which impermissibly expand federal power or restrict individual rights; as provided in this resolution. Section 6. That the United States Supreme Court shall refrain from issuing decisions which impermissibly expand federal power or restrict individual rights, as provided herein, and that the Court shall seek to reverse prior decisions which impermissibly expanded federal power or restricted individual rights at the earliest possible opportunity. Section 7 . (a) That the Secretary of State of Wyoming transmit copies of this resolution: ( i ) To the President of the United States, to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives of the United States Congress and to the Wyoming Congressional Delegation, with a request tha t the Wyoming Congressional D elegation take all reasonable and necessary actions to initiate the amendment process to amend the Constitution of the United States consistent with the language proposed in this resolution and that this resolution be officially entered in the congressional record as a memorial to the Congress of the United States of America; (ii) To the clerk of the United States Supreme Court with instructions that the resolution shall be distributed to all justices currently serving on the United States Supreme Court; and (ii i ) To the S peaker of the H ouse of R epresentatives and P resident of the S enate, or their equivalent, and the G overnor of each of the other forty-nine states. (END) 1 HJ0003