Plain English Breakdown
The plain English breakdown is still being put together. The official documents below are already here.
Straight-ahead summaries built from the official bill text. We keep the source links front and center and leave the decision up to you.
SF0114 • 2011
AN ACT relating to school districts; providing for the enhanced teacher evaluation pilot program as specified; requiring reports; providing an appropriation; and providing for an effective date.
The latest official action shows that this bill did not move forward in that session.
The plain English breakdown is still being put together. The official documents below are already here.
These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.
Standing Committee • COE
Plain English: Adopted Standing Committee by COE
Standing Committee • NICHOLAS,P
Plain English: Adopted Standing Committee by NICHOLAS,P
S Failed CoW; Indef Postponed
Amendment Adopted
S Amendments Adopted
Amendment Adopted
S Placed on General File
S02 Recommended Amend and Do Pass
S Rereferred to S02
S Placed on General File
S04 Recommended Amend and Do Pass
S Introduced and Referred to S04
S Received for Introduction
Bill Number Assigned
WORKING DRAFT 2011 STATE OF WYOMING 11LSO-0312 SENATE FILE NO. SF0114 Teacher evaluations. Sponsored by: Senator(s) Peterson and Representative(s) Harshman A BILL for AN ACT relating to s chool districts; providing for the enhanced teacher e valuation pilot program as specified; requiring reports; providing an appropriation; and providing for an effective date. Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming : Section 1. (a) Two hundred ten thousand dollars ($ 21 0,000.00) is appropriated from the general fund to the department of education to be expended for the teacher enhanced evaluation pilot program established and authorized under this section. This appropriation shall be for the period beginning with the effective date of this act and ending Ju ne 30 , 2012. (b) The enhanced teacher evaluation pilot program is established under this section to implement an enhanced evaluation process for all teachers in each school district participating in the pilot program. (c) The state superintenden t of public instruction shall select four ( 4 ) qualified school districts as provided in subsection (d) of this section to participate in the pilot program as follows: (i) One ( 1 ) school district with an average daily membership (ADM) of more than four thousand (4,000) ; (ii) One ( 1) school district with an ADM of more than one thousand (1,000) and four thousand (4,000) or less ; (iii) One ( 1 ) school district with an ADM of more than five hundred (500) and one thousand (1,000) or less ; (iv) One ( 1 ) school district with an ADM of five hundred (500) or less. (d) In selecting school districts under subsection (c) of this section, the state superintendent shall determine if the school district is a qualified school district. In order to be a qualified school district under this subsection, the school district shall: (i) Have an organized and active parent organization with elected officers and which meets at least once per month during the school year ; (ii) Submit a plan of action to the state superintendent which shall include the following: (A) A proposed schedule of teacher evaluations to the state superintendent which at a minimum would provide one (1) evaluation per semester for each teacher in the district; (B) A statement detailing the proposed evaluation process which will be implemented by the district. The evaluation process shall at a minimum comply with the requirements of subsection (e) of this section ; (C) A statement detailing the method the district will use to implement the results of evaluations conducted under the pilot program including recommending increases in pay for teachers with positive evaluations and implementing termination proceedings if a teacher receives three (3) consecutive failed evaluations. (e) From the amount appropriated under subsection (a) of this section, the state superintendent shall award grants to the school districts selected under subsection (c) of this section. The grants shall be expended by the districts to implement an expanded teacher evaluation process which includes: (i) Using built-in classroom cameras to record at least one (1) class period, unannounced per semester for each teacher in the district; (ii) Evaluation of each recorded class by the school principal, the teacher who is being evaluated, an instructional facilitator or a teacher with at least ten (10) years of teaching experience and a parent of the school's parent organization selected by the organization . Each person evaluating a recorded class shall complete an evaluation review form which will be reviewed by the principal and the instructional facilitator or teacher with ten (10) years of experience to determine recommendations for improvement , set goals and timelines for improvement or make recommendation s for performance based pay increase; (iii) A parent selected to participate in evaluating a class shall attend the monthly meeting of the parent organization. The parent group shall report to the school board each month on the evaluations performed that month and the evaluations scheduled for the upcoming month. (f) Each district participating in the pilot program under this section shall report to the state superintendent not later than June 30 , 2012 on the effectiveness of the program. The report may include recommendations for continuing or expanding the pilot program. The state superintendent shall compile the reports submitted under this subsection and report the results to the joint education interim committee and the joint appropriations interim committee not later than December 1, 2012. Section 2. This act is effective July 1, 2011. (END) 1 SF0114