Plain English Breakdown
The plain English breakdown is still being put together. The official documents below are already here.
Straight-ahead summaries built from the official bill text. We keep the source links front and center and leave the decision up to you.
HB0121 • 2014
AN ACT relating to civil and criminal procedure; specifying circumstances under which evidence of a prior sexual assault offense may be admitted in criminal and civil cases involving sexual assault; and providing for an effective date.
The latest official action shows that this bill did not move forward in that session.
The plain English breakdown is still being put together. The official documents below are already here.
These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.
Standing Committee • H01
Plain English: Filed Standing Committee by H01
H Did Not Consider in CoW
H Placed on General File
H01 Recommended Amend and Do Pass
H Introduced and Referred to H01
H Received for Introduction
Bill Number Assigned
WORKING DRAFT 2014 STATE OF WYOMING 14LSO-0040 HOUSE BILL NO. HB0121 Admissibility of evidence in sex offense cases. Sponsored by: Representative(s) Burkhart, Hutchings and Krone and Senator(s) Nutting A BILL for AN ACT relating to civil and criminal procedure; specifying circumstances under which evidence of a prior sexual assault offense may be admitted in criminal and civil cases involving sexual assault; and providing for an effective date. Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming : Section 1. W.S. 1 ‑ 12 ‑ 117 and 6 ‑ 2 ‑ 321 are created to read: 1 ‑ 12 ‑ 117. Evidence of similar acts in civil c ases concerning sexual assault . (a) In a civil case in which a claim for damages or other relief is predicated on a party's alleged commission of conduct constituting an offense of sexual assault as defined in W.S. 6 ‑ 2 ‑ 321 , evidence of that party's commission of another offense or offenses of sexual assault may be offered and conside r ed as provided in W.S. 6 ‑ 2 ‑ 321 . ( b ) This section shall not be construed to limit the admission or consideration of evidence under any other section or court rule. 6 ‑ 2 ‑ 321 . Evidence of similar crimes in sexual assault cases. (a) In a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of an offense of sexual assault, evidence of the defendant's commission of another offense or offenses of sexual assault may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant. (b) In a ny case in which a party intends to offer evidence under this section , the following procedure shall be used: ( i ) A written motion shall be made by the offering par ty to the court at least fifteen (15 ) days prior to the scheduled start of the trial stating that the party has an offer of proof of the relevancy of evidence of the prior sexual assault; (ii) The written motion shall be accompanied by affidavits in which the offer of proof is stated; (iii) If the court finds the offer of proof sufficient, the court shall order a hearing in chambers, and at the hearing allow the parties to be heard regarding the offer of proof and other pertinent evidence; (iv) At the conclusion of the hearing, if the court finds that the probative value of the evidence substantially outweighs the probability that its admission will create unfair prejudice, the evidence shall be admissible pursuant to this section. The court may make an order stating what evidence may be introduced by the party , which order may include the nature of the questions to be permitted. (c) In determining whether evidence of a prior sexual assault should be admitted under this section , the court shall consider: ( i ) The probative value of the prior sexual assault t o prove the material fact it is intended to prove; (ii) Whether the material fact is seriously disputed; (i i i) How clearly the prior sexual assault has been proven; (i v ) Whether other evidence is available; ( v ) Whether the evidence of th e prior sexual assault is unnecessarily cumulative; (v i ) The time that has e lapsed between the prior sexual assault and the current allegations; (vi i ) The simil arity between the prior sexual assault and the current allegations; ( viii ) The likelihood of unfair prejudice because of: (A) The reprehensible nature of the prior sexual assault; (B) The sympathetic nature of the prior victim; (C) The disparity in seriousness between the prior sexual assault and the current allegations; (D) The appearance that a prior sexual assault escaped punishment. ( i x ) Whether a limiting instruction would diminish the prejudicial effect of the evidence of the prior sexual assault ; (x ) Any other relevant factor. (d ) This section shall not be construed to limit the admission or consideration of evidence under any other section or court rule. (e ) As used in this section "offense of sexual assault" means: ( i ) Sexual assault as defined in W.S. 6 ‑ 2 ‑ 301(a)(v); (ii) An offense under a statute from another jurisdiction containing the same or similar elements as sexual assault as defined in W.S. 6 ‑ 2 ‑ 301(a)(v); or (iii) An attempt or conspiracy to engage in conduct described in paragraph ( i ) or (ii) of this subsection. Section 2. This act is effective July 1, 201 4 . (END) 1 HB0121