Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because he believes the Senate made extensive changes to it.
Methamphetamine initiative.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
2005 General Session Summary for HB0308 Bill No.: HB0308 Drafter: JHR LSO No.: 05LSO-0260 Effective Date: 7/1/2005 Enrolled Act No.: HEA0136 Chapter No.: 245 Prime Sponsor: Representative Osborn Catch Title: Methamphetamine initiative. Subject: Authorizes programs to address problems associated with illegal use of methamphetamine and other controlled substances. Summary/Major Elements: This bill: Appropriates funds as follows: $2 million to the Department of Health for FY06 to increase access to treatment for persons addicted to methamphetamine (Meth) and other controlled substances, grants to be awarded by the Governor's Advisory Board on Substance Abuse and Violent Crime (GABSAVC), with a 25% local match requirement for local and regional grantees; $5 million to the Attorney General for FY06 for employment of law enforcement, prosecutors and public defenders to address offenses relating to the use, sale or manufacture of meth and other controlled substances, through grants awarded by the GABSAVC after review and recommendations by the Attorney General; $500 thousand to the Attorney General for competitive grants to cities and counties for probation services for juveniles sentenced by circuit or municipal courts for drug offenses; $500 thousand to DFS for training in the implementation of best practices to improve parenting skills as a one-time bonus payment; $1 million to the Department of Health for implementation of best practices prevention and intervention services for families receiving treatment services for meth and other controlled substances, grants to be awarded by the GABSAVC to public or private entities after review and recommendations by the Department; Requires the Department of Health: To prepare RFPs from private and public entities to increase treatment options for persons addicted to meth and other controlled substances and solicit bids from entities that will provide a 25% local match; Review grant proposals in consultation with the GABSAVC and submit recommendations by Oct. 30, 2005 to the Joint Appropriations and Labor Interim Committees. Comments: Report with recommendations required to JAC and Joint Labor, Health and Social Services Interim Committees by October 30, 2005 relating to proposals to increase treatment options for persons with meth and other controlled substance problems.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 8:17 PM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because he believes the Senate made extensive changes to it.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues against an exemption for recreational vehicles because it is more dangerous when a driver under the influence operates such a vehicle with passengers, and maintaining that exemption contradicts the goal of preventing drunk driving.
H22
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes a specific aspect of the legislation because he believes it would create an inequitable justice system based on economic status, religion, or race.
H13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports concurrence on the bill because she believes open container laws are difficult for law enforcement to enforce and place a heavy burden on them.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because methamphetamine is a severe problem that requires more funding to address effectively.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it funds proven programs that help parents educate their children, assist schools in preventing drug use, and target at-risk youth.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because feedback indicates the Triple P program makes a significant positive difference in local communities and deserves continued funding.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because this specific amendment targets funding more effectively than previous versions, focusing on education and parenting programs that can influence thousands of parents.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it directs funding toward alternative school students who are identified as a high-risk group based on statistical evidence.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
9 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
8 stored
Failed 2nd reading by MILLER
Adopted 2nd reading by MEULI
Adopted, Corrected 3rd reading by WASSERBURG
Adopted Committee of the Whole by OSBORN
Adopted Committee of the Whole by OSBORN
Adopted Standing Committee by H10
Adopted Standing Committee by H02
Adopted Standing Committee by SCOTT