David R Edwards

The lawmaker supports the bill because it tightens regulations by requiring inspections to occur during weight or safety checks and adds a probable cause standard for inspecting dyed fuel.

The lawmaker supports concurring with Senate amendments because they insert provisions for oversize and overweight vehicles, which he views as a positive change.

The lawmaker supports the bill because it will allow individuals who were previously restricted to access their homes or ranches via certain roads.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes the existing veterans museum in Casper is well-maintained, professionally curated under military auspices, and does not require additional funding to find a new location.

The lawmaker explains that driver services fees need to be raised because there is currently a $5 million shortfall per biennium and additional costs are expected from the federal Real ID mandate.

The speaker explains that the bill is necessary because National Guard physicians are not being replaced while they are deployed overseas for a war.

The lawmaker speaks in favor of the bill to address issues related to people detaching seat belts.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because he believes it is introduced too late in the session and should be worked on further during an interim period instead.

The lawmaker supports the bill because it allows individuals who qualify for handicap plates and own multiple vehicles to purchase two plates. He emphasizes that strict medical eligibility requirements prevent abuse.

The lawmaker opposes granting premium credits because it is a dangerous path given that the fund was nearly bankrupt in 1988, and urges further discussion before proceeding.

The lawmaker concludes that despite public reluctance to pay more, the deteriorating condition of the roads necessitates increased funding.

The lawmaker states they voted against the vehicle sales tax bill after being lobbied by dealers who prefer county treasurers to handle collection and due concerns from used car dealers.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because dealers have lobbied against it, and there are concerns regarding used car dealers and individuals purchasing vehicles out of state.

The lawmaker argues that fees must be increased because the current rates do not cover administration costs and overweight vehicles are damaging roads.

The lawmaker argues that fees have not been raised in 14 years and are now too low due to inflation, necessitating an increase to support Department of Transportation employees.