Liz Gentile
H36
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it prioritizes victim rights and safety, particularly for minors involved in incest cases.
Incest-increase in penalties.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
2007 General Session Summary for HB0019 Bill No.: HB0019 Drafter: JHR LSO No.: 07LSO-0011 Effective Date: 7/1/2007 Enrolled Act No.: HEA0008 Chapter No.: 12 Prime Sponsor: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee Catch Title: Incest-increase in penalties. Subject: Increases the penalties for the crime of incest. Summary/Major Elements: Under current law, the penalties for the crime of incest are imprisonment for not more than 5 years, a fine of not more than $5,000.00, or both. This bill increases the penalties to imprisonment for not more than 15 years, a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 1:01 PM
H36
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it prioritizes victim rights and safety, particularly for minors involved in incest cases.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it introduces a new concept of mandatory minimums based on victim age, which raises potential constitutional questions and mathematical errors.
H13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because setting a mandatory minimum sentence for all incest cases ignores the wide range of behaviors involved and removes judicial discretion to review specific case details.
H56
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it could result in negative sentences when a juvenile charged as an adult victimizes someone older than themselves.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
4 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
2 stored
Failed 2nd reading by WARREN
Failed 3rd reading by GENTILE