Mark Semlek
H01
Why they voted this way
The speaker argues that without immunity, no one would be willing to serve as a board member because volunteers should not face liability risks.
Recruitment of physicians and dentists.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
2008 General Session Summary for HB0155 Bill No.: HB0155 Drafter: JHR LSO No.: 08LSO-0393 Effective Date: Enrolled Act No.: Chapter No.: Prime Sponsor: Representative Lubnau Catch Title: Recruitment of physicians and dentists. Subject: Creates a physician recruitment program as specified. Summary/Major Elements: This bill: Creates a physician recruitment program and account to be administered by the Department of Health (WDH); Authorizes the WDH to solicit applications from hospitals, private physicians and others seeking to recruit physicians, with priority given to need based on geographic area, then by need within the area; Authorizes 1 year grants for physician recruitment, allowing the recruiter to make firm offers with financial incentives to qualifying out-of-state physicians subject to written agreements; Provides financial incentives (recruitment costs up to $10,000; relocation costs up to $20,000; malpractice insurance premiums up to $10,000/year for 2 years; signing bonuses up to $30,000) for recruitment of physicians who sign 2 year agreements to serve specified populations within the community to which recruited; Requires repayment of grants with interest for failure to fulfill the terms of the written agreement; Repeals a local matching funds requirement for the physician and dentist loan repayment program; Requires rulemaking by the WDH. Comments: Creates/amends major program Creates a physician recruitment program. Note: Final action on this bill was not taken at the time this summary was prepared. Should changes be made to the bill upon final passage, an updated summary will be transmitted to all legislators.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 11:06 PM
H01
Why they voted this way
The speaker argues that without immunity, no one would be willing to serve as a board member because volunteers should not face liability risks.
Why they voted this way
The speaker explains that denying immunity to board members would result in an inability to find anyone willing to serve on the board.
Why they voted this way
The speaker recommends voting for the bill because it ensures board members can serve and are properly charged to achieve desired results.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports keeping the appropriation because there is a documented shortage of physicians in specific areas and specialties that requires funding to address.
S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes removing the funding because other states are competing heavily with more resources, making the $800,000 essential for recruitment.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues against removing the appropriation because maintaining a competitive funding level is necessary to successfully recruit doctors into the state.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to remove the new appropriation because sufficient funds already exist in the budget and a more orderly allocation process should be established first.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges support for the bill because it fixes a loan repayment program that could otherwise result in people using the program being charged with federal crimes.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
11 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
3 stored
Adopted, Corrected Standing Committee by H01
Adopted 2nd reading by NICHOLAS
Withdrawn 2nd reading by BEBOUT