Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2008Enacted

SF0005

Peace officers-probation and parole agents.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Official summary

2008 General Session Summary for SF0005 Bill No.: SF0005 Drafter: JHR LSO No.: 08LSO-0034 Effective Date: 7/1/2008 Enrolled Act No.: SEA0041 Chapter No.: Prime Sponsor: Senator Fecht Catch Title: Peace officers-probation and parole agents. Subject: Expands the definition of "peace officer" to include probation and parole officers and supervisors for purposes of the criminal offense of interference with a peace officer. Summary/Major Elements: Under current law, probation and parole officers and supervisors are not considered peace officers for purposes of the criminal offense of interference with a peace officer (including disarming a peace officer). This bill provides a definition of "peace officer" to include persons who are employed on a full-time basis by the Department of Corrections as probation and parole officers or supervisors for purposes of the criminal offense of interference with a peace officer (including disarming a peace officer).

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 8, 10:51 PM

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker explains that detention officers were removed from a specific reference in the bill because they are already covered under assault statutes elsewhere, and therefore requests support for concurrence.

Public statementFloor statement at 53:12 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that detention officers were omitted from the bill's protections despite facing similar risks as peace officers. They state this amendment closes a legal loophole where attacking a detention officer is currently treated less severely than attacking other covered personnel.

Public statementFloor statement at 36:40 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes it corrects an oversight by including people who are most likely to be placed in dangerous situations but were previously excluded.

Public statementFloor statement at 37:32 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because there is a specific situation in their district involving an asbestos-contaminated property that cannot be cleaned due to a lack of county authority.

Public statementFloor statement at 3:32 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

6 roll calls

S Did Concur 29-1-0-0-02008-03-05 · Senate29 yes 1 no
H Passed 3rd Reading 59-0-1-0-02008-03-04 · House59 yes 0 no
H01 Recommended Amend and Do Pass 9-0-0-0-02008-02-28 · House9 yes 0 no
S Passed 3rd Reading 29-1-0-0-02008-02-25 · Senate29 yes 1 no
S01 Recommended Do Pass 5-0-0-0-02008-02-15 · Senate5 yes 0 no
S Introduced and Referred to S01 30-0-0-0-02008-02-12 · Senate30 yes 0 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. Assigned Chapter Number - 103LSO
  2. Governor Signed SEA0041Governor
  3. H Speaker Signed SEA No. 0041House
  4. S President Signed SEA No. 0041Senate
  5. Assigned Number SEA0041LSO
  6. S Did ConcurSenate
  7. H Passed 3rd ReadingHouse
  8. H Passed 2nd ReadingHouse
  9. H Passed CoWHouse
  10. H Amendments AdoptedHouse
  11. Amendment AdoptedHouse
  12. H Placed on General FileHouse
  13. H01 Recommended Amend and Do PassHouse
  14. H Introduced and Referred to H01House
  15. H Received for IntroductionHouse
  16. S Passed 3rd ReadingSenate
  17. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  18. S Amendments AdoptedSenate
  19. S Passed 2nd ReadingSenate
  20. S Passed CoWSenate

Changes

Amendments

2 stored

SF0005HS001

Adopted Standing Committee by H01

SF0005S3001

Adopted 3rd reading by BEBOUT