Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2013Vetoed

HB0237

Unemployment insurance-worker misconduct.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Official summary

Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit> Bill No.: HB0237 Drafter: LGC LSO No.: 13LSO-0608 Effective Date: 7/1/2013 Enrolled Act No.: HEA0107 Chapter No.: Prime Sponsor: Representative Reeder Catch Title: Unemployment insurance-worker misconduct. Subject: Defining misconduct connected with work for purposes of the Wyoming employment security law. Summary/Major Elements: Under current law, an employee will not receive benefits and benefits will not be charged against an employees account for unemployment benefits if the employee is found to have been discharged from employment for misconduct in connection with his work. The term is not defined. The act defines the term misconduct in connection with work as an act of an employee which indicates a disregard of the employers interests or the commonly accepted duties, obligations and responsibilities of an employee. The term does not include ordinary negligence in isolated instances or good faith errors. COMMENTS: This bill was vetoed by the Governor. The veto message noted that as introduced the bill would have provided a definition of misconduct connected to work which would have established a clear line as to when an employee was entitled to unemployment insurance. However, the bill was amended and the clarity was lost. In the Governors view, the enacted bill could have been interpreted that in no case would a discharged employee be eligible for unemployment insurance.

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 7, 12:59 PM

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the concurrence because discussions with the bill's sponsor indicated that removing a specific sentence aligns with the Senate's intent to clarify the definition of misconduct.

Public statementFloor statement at 32:25 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker encourages an aye vote because they believe that isolated instances and good faith errors are already covered by existing law, making the amendment unnecessary.

Public statementFloor statement at 34:00 Watch the statement

Cale Case

R · S25

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that denying unemployment benefits except for gross misconduct undermines the safety net and contradicts a Wyoming Supreme Court ruling.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:43:15 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because its final sentence limits harsh interpretations of misconduct, such as firing someone for a minor accident like spilling water.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:45:49 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because restoring only one sentence while leaving out others could confuse courts about legislative intent and create more problems.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:46:54 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it would create a loophole allowing too many people to claim unemployment, which contradicts the bill's goal of rebalancing the system for employers.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:48:39 Watch the statement

Bill Landen

R · S27

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because it establishes clear definitions of misconduct, balancing employer interests with allowing benefits for ordinary negligence.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:50:20 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

5 roll calls

H Did Concur 54-4-2-0-02013-02-26 · House54 yes 4 no
S Passed 3rd Reading 17-12-1-0-02013-02-25 · Senate17 yes 12 no
S07 Recommended Do Pass 4-0-1-0-02013-02-19 · Senate4 yes 0 no
H Passed 3rd Reading 57-0-3-0-02013-02-06 · House57 yes 0 no
H10 Recommended Amend and Do Pass 6-3-0-0-02013-02-01 · House6 yes 3 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. Governor Vetoed HEA No. 0107Governor
  2. S President Signed HEA No. 0107Senate
  3. H Speaker Signed HEA No. 0107House
  4. Assigned Number HEA0107LSO
  5. H Did ConcurHouse
  6. H Received for ConcurrenceHouse
  7. S Passed 3rd ReadingSenate
  8. Amendment FailedSenate
  9. S Passed 2nd ReadingSenate
  10. S Amendments AdoptedSenate
  11. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  12. S Passed CoWSenate
  13. S Placed on General FileSenate
  14. S07 Recommended Do PassSenate
  15. S Introduced and Referred to S07Senate
  16. S Received for IntroductionSenate
  17. H Passed 3rd ReadingHouse
  18. Amendment AdoptedHouse
  19. H Passed 2nd ReadingHouse
  20. Amendment AdoptedHouse

Changes

Amendments

5 stored

HB0237H2001

Adopted 2nd reading by BROWN

HB0237H3001

Adopted 3rd reading by CONNOLLY

HB0237HS001

Adopted Standing Committee by H10

HB0237S2001

Adopted 2nd reading by SCOTT

HB0237S3001

Failed 3rd reading by CASE