Garry C Piiparinen

The lawmaker supports the amendment because laws should provide equal protection to everyone without carving out exceptions based on occupation.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because constituents have requested non-support, arguing it is more than just a simple cleanup of unused statutes.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because, while acknowledging it would be more efficient for the board, they believe maintaining public transparency and avoiding the perception of secrecy is a higher priority than convenience.

The lawmaker opposes the bill due to concerns about adding this expense on top of other financial challenges facing Wyoming's future.

The lawmaker opposes making this a legislative issue, preferring that schools and colleges handle hazing at the local level.

The lawmaker opposes the bill due to its high cost of $4 million to $5 million for additional attorneys and a new agency, citing struggles with state finances.

The lawmaker opposes the bill simply because it creates another task force.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because Highway 59 is already known as the energy highway, which represents local pride, and attention should instead focus on safety improvements for workers.