Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2014Enacted

HB0169

Medicaid waiver programs-case management system.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Official summary

Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit> Bill No.: HB0169 Drafter: LGC LSO No.: 14LSO-0419 Effective Date: 7/1/2014 Enrolled Act No.: HEA0058 Chapter No.: CH0045 Prime Sponsor: Representative Davison Catch Title: Medicaid waiver programs-case management system. Subject: Medicaid waiver programs. Summary/Major Elements: In 2013, the legislature passed Medicaid reform which required the department of health to provide for a case management system for the developmental disability waiver program that is free of conflicts of interest. This bill amends the conflict of interest requirement to ensure that the requirement will not be administered to affect any client case manager relationship existing and continuously maintained on or before July 1, 2014. The bill directs the department to apply for waivers or permissions to allow exceptions to federal conflict free case management definitions for rural areas.

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 7, 6:18 AM

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports the bill because it allows for a gradual transition to new case management standards and permits exceptions in areas with few providers.

Public statementFloor statement at 32:05 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it ensures trained case managers remain in their jobs and do not leave the state.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:13:45 Watch the statement

Lee Filer

D · H12

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to prevent losing federal funding for case management and to ensure clients retain their familiar case managers who work with families.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:14:06 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes Division 2 because setting a future date for grandfathering creates a perverse incentive to sign up just before that deadline, which contradicts best practices.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:18:57 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports keeping the July 1st date to provide a clear model for case managers and providers, arguing that changing it would disrupt their planning.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:20:09 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it provides clarity and allows existing case managers time for preparation and planning regarding their relationships.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:21:44 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker states her son is in the program and would lose his current case manager if the bill does not pass, as state rules currently prevent a provider from also acting as a case manager.

Public statementFloor statement at 57:30 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill, stating that federal CMS directives require a conflict-free system to prevent fraud where providers direct people to services they profit from.

Public statementFloor statement at 58:14 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment, arguing that in Wyoming's small community where everyone is related, having someone involved with a program makes it work better.

Public statementFloor statement at 59:43 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

6 roll calls

H Did Concur 55-4-1-0-02014-03-05 · House55 yes 4 no
S Passed 3rd Reading 26-4-0-0-02014-03-05 · Senate26 yes 4 no
S10 Recommended Do Pass 4-1-0-0-02014-02-28 · Senate4 yes 1 no
H Passed 3rd Reading 56-3-1-0-02014-02-24 · House56 yes 3 no
H10 Recommended Do Pass 6-3-0-0-02014-02-20 · House6 yes 3 no
H Introduced and Referred to H10 51-8-1-0-02014-02-14 · House51 yes 8 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. Assigned Chapter NumberLSO
  2. Governor Signed HEA0058Governor
  3. S President Signed HEA No. 0058Senate
  4. H Speaker Signed HEA No. 0058House
  5. Assigned Number HEA0058LSO
  6. H Did ConcurHouse
  7. H Received for ConcurrenceHouse
  8. S Passed 3rd ReadingSenate
  9. Amendment FailedSenate
  10. Amendment FailedSenate
  11. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  12. S Passed 2nd ReadingSenate
  13. S Passed CoWSenate
  14. S Amendments AdoptedSenate
  15. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  16. S Placed on General FileSenate
  17. S10 Recommended Do PassSenate
  18. S Introduced and Referred to S10Senate
  19. S Received for IntroductionSenate
  20. H Passed 3rd ReadingHouse

Changes

Amendments

11 stored

HB0169H2001

Filed 2nd reading by FILER

HB0169H2001.01

Adopted, Corrected 2nd reading by FILER

HB0169H2001.02

Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by FILER

HB0169H2002

Withdrawn 2nd reading by DAVISON

HB0169H3001

Adopted 3rd reading by DAVISON

HB0169H3002

Filed 3rd reading by FILER

HB0169S3001

Filed 3rd reading by ROTHFUSS

HB0169S3001.01

Adopted 3rd reading by ROTHFUSS

HB0169S3001.02

Failed 3rd reading by ROTHFUSS

HB0169S3002

Failed 3rd reading by ROTHFUSS

HB0169SW001

Adopted Committee of the Whole by PETERSON